Boz Mon clearly said in the original post that he wants all season tires.
I'm aware of what he said in his original post. I wanted him to be aware of an alternative approach. It's up to him whether or not it a) makes sense or b) suits his budget.
Not everyone wants to swap tires twice a year, or wants to have an extra set sitting in their garage.
I swap 'em twice a weekend if it's an autocross weekend.

It takes me 7-8 minutes a wheel/tire and my car has those infernal lug bolts that you have to line up rather than the easy stud/nut system most cars use.
It's not for everyone, I agree. But since MOST high performance cars (Porsches, Corvettes, BMWs, etc.) these days are delivered to the customer with OE summer tires, it is NOT at all uncommon for owners living in the snow belt to have a winter set in the garage. Some of you guys are acting like it's an abberation or something... LOTS of people do this.
Also I think while outright grip is a good indicator of the sport performance of a tire, the way in which it breaks away is far more important in day to day street driving. Slip angles are your friend if you plan to push the limits on the street.
I agree that breakaway or "11/10ths" performance is crucial in a performance tire. In this aspect, I would still say summer tires are usually superior to all season tires.
Let me put that a different way: If I compare all the 'Max' or 'Ultra High' summer tires I've driven against All Season 'Ultra High' or 'High' performance tires, the summer tires generally deliver not only better performance, but more predicatable, easier to use behavior as well.
I agree somewhat. The RE040 does have excellent and foolproof grip whether dry or wet. I also agree that you can get over 20,000 miles on a set while driving hard. I have a close friend who scored 4 free 225/45-18 RE040s from 350Zs at his Honda/Mazda/Nissan dealership. I can't argue the noise you qoute because these tires that were on 18" 350Zs were very problematic, excessively loud, and wore a feathery pattern. Bridgestone has since solved the problem. Anyway, my buddy put those tires on his Maz 3--he has some 18" wheels--and now has just over 20,000 miles and is in need of a new set.
I'm no 350Z guru, but it was my understanding that the feathering issue on the Z was a front suspension geometry issue, not a Bridgestone problem.
my350z.com 350Z FAQ thread
:
Q: Has the tire feathering been fixed?
A: There is no definite answer. Tire feathering can occur on any vehicle with improper toe settings. It is more likely to occur on sports cars. Early 350z years (2003, 2004) had more cases of tire feathering, possibly due to bad alignment specs, slight changes in suspension. In general one should not expect the same long tire life as on normal cars, and one needs to keep an eye on tire wear and possibly re-align or rotate tires when signs of irregular wear can be observed. When lowering the vehicle a lot, one may need to purchase adjustable control arms to be able to bring alignment back within spec. This however is not needed or useful on the stock 350z suspension or the NISMO S Tune suspension.
Given that Nissan hasn't said anything about geometry changes to the Z suspension, maybe Bridgestone "patched" Nissan's "bug" by updating their tire?
THe funny thing is that the treadwear on those tires is 140. That's pitiful. The tire is an Ultra High Performance Summer, two classes below the Kuhmo MX tires I drove on, which had a treadwear of 220, and that's supported by quite a few reviews on tirerack with hard driving styles and 10,000+ miles on them. They offer more grip in the dry and wet and are generally much more inexpensive than the Bridgestones. A 215/45-17 MX is $99, whereas the RE040 is $152. A 235/40-18 MX is $133, and the Bridgestone is $230.
Treadwear ratings only have comparative value when comparing tires made by the same manufactuer. In other words, a Bridgestone 140 is different from a Michelin 140 which is different from a Kumho 140.
Tire size is the same way. Manufactuers measure width in different ways. I have a set of Kumho V700 Victorracers in 225 that are quite a bit wider than my Pilot Sport PS2 225 width street tires. In fact, the Kumhos may even be wider than my PS2 *255*s.
Anyways, I had a set of Kumho MXs on my E36 M3 and they lasted me the same 20,000 as my RE040As. So if anything, Kumho is somewhat optimistic with it's 220 rating. However, the MX is a ludicrously good deal for a performance tire and the #1 exception to the rule I stated earlier.
Which tire I recommend all depends on your budget. I've been very partial to Bridgestone RE040s / RE050s and Michelin Pilot Sport PS2s lately. But a Kumho MX offers up almost as much performance for half the price.
They also make some pretty good bang for the buck R comps.
M