Nissan Scraps Le Mans Program, Kills Oddball GT-R LM

  • Thread starter Jayson619
  • 19 comments
  • 1,285 views

The GT-R LM Nismo is the WORST car ever by Nissan


  • Total voters
    45
259
Singapore
Singapore
Jayson619
Noah Joseph@Autoblog
The weird, front-engine LMP1 racecar is dead.

After a poor initial showing this past season, Nissan has announced that it won't be returning to the LMP1 class next year with the innovative, flawed GT-R LM Nismo.

The Japanese automaker hit the endurance racing grid last season trying to exploit a loophole in the regulations with a radical front-engine/front-drive layout, while its rivals put everything in the back. The idea was that it would allow better aerodynamics, with more downforce over the driven wheels and cleaner airflow at the rear. Unfortunately the gamble didn't pay off: Nissan fielded three cars at Le Mans alone (but not at the other seven races in the championship), and none of them made it to the finish line.

Some manufacturers might have chalked it up to teething problems, but Nissan immediately put the entire program under review. After some delay, it announced it would enter the prototype in the series after all – but now it has apparently had a change of heart. According to the statement below, Nissan is withdrawing the forward-thinking prototype from the entire 2016 FIA World Endurance Championship. Nissan UK spokesman Andy Bothwell confirmed that the withdrawal includes Le Mans as well: "The GT-R LM NISMO will not compete in the Le Mans 24 Hours," Bothwell wrote to Autoblog via email. "However, Nissan's commitment to its motorsport programmes on a global level remains as strong as ever."

The manufacturer will continue competing in other categories, including LMP2 where it powers a large portion of the grid, and the new LMP3 class for which it recently revealed a new engine design. The manufacturer does not compete in the GTE category at Le Mans or its associated series. However its GT-R GT3 continues to compete in the Blancpain Endurance Series, winning the championship in 2013 and one race this past season.

The cancellation of Nissan's LMP1 program will be bad news for the FIA and ACO. The series organizers typically welcome with open arms the arrival of new manufacturers, especially at the front of the grid, and will invariably be disappointed with one's departure. But it will hardly be any sweat off of the backs of Audi, Porsche, or Toyota, which were never really challenged by Nissan's entry, and won't likely be affected one way or another by its departure.

http://www.autoblog.com/2015/12/22/nissan-gtrlm-nismo-racing-news-official/

Not surprised really. I really find the car an outright disaster from the start with their FF layout and low power output. I struggled virtually with the car in the 24-minutes of Le Mans on GT6 and out of one win I lost the rest since then. I guess that win was by luck and I'll never use that car again...ever.

RIP GT-R LM Nismo. Your lack of power and FF drivetrain just bought you and early ticket to your grave.

06C305C5-FC26-430B-A1CA-E301ADDBB895.jpg
 
The car may loses and folds. But one thing for sure, it does bring the good old experimental days.

I have more respect on that rather than just another generic MR car. Im also surprised they didnt go back to have a contract with the Deltawing instead.
 
Shame really. It was a very interesting concept, particularly the way it exploited some of the holes in the regulations which, over the years, have been tailored to suit the mid engine RWD cars.

To be honest, I feel like they never really gave themselves a chance. Not enough testing, rolled up to Le Mans without a working ERS system, and the car performed accordingly. Then hey didn't compete in the rest of the series or give themselves a chance to prove the concept.

Perhaps there is a good reason why nobody has made a FWD LMP1 car in the past...
 
The plan for the Nissan LMP1 was for the gasoline engine to run the front tires and the hybrid system to run the rear tires under certain instances, mainly on corner exit acceleration. They never got the hybrid system working so we never got to see it's true potential.
You're right, my bad. I figured that was what you were referring to but couldn't help to be the first to point that out.
 
That's what I just said...

Yep, missed that post. Even if the recovery systems were working though, it's still a full time FWD drive with intermittent electric drive to the rear wheels vs. the other cars which are full time RWD, part time FWD
 
Yep, missed that post. Even if the recovery systems were working though, it's still a full time FWD drive with intermittent electric drive to the rear wheels vs. the other cars which are full time RWD, part time FWD
Also what I just said. :lol: The hybrid system was designed to help with corner exit acceleration, which honestly is really only where it would need it. Accelerating down the straightaway is fine with FWD and a properly set up FWD car has no issues on corner entry.
 
I think that there was something in the rules that said RWD cars couldn't deploy ERS under a certain speed but it said nothing about FWD.
 
Also what I just said. :lol: The hybrid system was designed to help with corner exit acceleration, which honestly is really only where it would need it. Accelerating down the straightaway is fine with FWD and a properly set up FWD car has no issues on corner entry.

I know, I was agreeing with you haha
 
Back