====>>CLIFFNOTES OFFERED AT BOTTOM<<====
I've got to be honest. I have avoided making a thread about this, mostly because I greatly enjoy GT5 and I'm tired of people knocking it. I would hate to join the crowd. However, I find this more of a rant about the 'those guys' that make up the large segment of open lobby races, not really against GT.
Something that REALLY burns my arse is the way you cannot FIND a 200hp race. You can't find a 300hp race. You cant find a 400hp race. Why? Because every single host is so freaking afraid that their car might get outdone. So... what do you see? You see 324.563 hp. (I exaggerate for effect) They do this almost always because they want to have their car at the VERY PEAK of the hp cap. Heaven forbid if they have a 374hp car, that they make a 400hp race. They have to cap it at 375 (or even 374), and often label it a 350hp race. Heck, run down the open lobby and see for yourself. I've even gotten to the point that on half of them, I can pick out the car that the host is using, just by the HP cap.
Sure, there are some valid times I see this occuring. If the race was named "x2010 only race" and had the hp cap at 1557, clearly the host is trying to establish a one-make race. Thats fine. And the title can reflect the specific taste the race is after. I can also see a 400hp limit getting knocked up to 401 because someone really wants to use their favorite car and they cant tune it below the 401. (Though, personally I would love trying to take a favorite car in a 500hp class even if 99 hp behind. The loss wouldnt hurt so much, and the win would be infinitely more gratifying.)
Unfortunately, this makes up a very small segment of these 'oddly chosen' hp or weight limitations. Sure enough, the host is almost always sitting on the peak hp for the limitation, and right on the weight minimum.
Are we really that insecure about our tuning or our racing ability that we have to ensure that NOONE can have better power-to-weight than us?
I will say that it wont stop me from joining. Sometimes I can dominate the host, and toss a wrench in their plans, and sometimes I walk away with my arse in my hands, tail between legs.
Frankly, I dont give a darn if I lose. Im not advocating some sort of sissy 'its how you play the game' mentality. If I lost, then I realize I am doing something wrong. Either I bought and built a car that cannot stand up to other people in the segment, or my driving in general is inferior and needs improvement, or maybe my experience with the specific vehicle I was driving isn't up to par yet.
If I always dominated power-to-weight, then it would great reduce my ability to get better, AND it would lose a lot of playability. I find myself having a lot more fun laughing with a group of drivers as I trail a half-lap behind in a clean, well matched race... rather than leading in a group of grief filled hotheads.
I dont know, I dont think that the answer lays in any change by PD. I suppose its something that can only be found in establishing your own racing circles with people that enjoy more than winning. The people that want to win the clubman cup with the x2010 can form there own and all argue over hp caps being set to their cars.
I'm sure I'm not the only one that gets a chuckle over the 'host-setting-limitations-to-their-car' races as they peruse the open lobby looking for one to join. But honestly, are they really enjoying themselves. It puzzles me that these individuals make up the majority.
I suppose I'm lucky to have found this community, that values hearty, clean racing.
================>>CLIFFNOTES<<================
It makes me chuckle to see the majority of open lobby races have odd hp values (such as 559hp) rather than setting the room up for 600hp cap. Hosts must be very insecure to set limitations so that their car is at the top of the power-to-weight ratio.
I've got to be honest. I have avoided making a thread about this, mostly because I greatly enjoy GT5 and I'm tired of people knocking it. I would hate to join the crowd. However, I find this more of a rant about the 'those guys' that make up the large segment of open lobby races, not really against GT.
Something that REALLY burns my arse is the way you cannot FIND a 200hp race. You can't find a 300hp race. You cant find a 400hp race. Why? Because every single host is so freaking afraid that their car might get outdone. So... what do you see? You see 324.563 hp. (I exaggerate for effect) They do this almost always because they want to have their car at the VERY PEAK of the hp cap. Heaven forbid if they have a 374hp car, that they make a 400hp race. They have to cap it at 375 (or even 374), and often label it a 350hp race. Heck, run down the open lobby and see for yourself. I've even gotten to the point that on half of them, I can pick out the car that the host is using, just by the HP cap.
Sure, there are some valid times I see this occuring. If the race was named "x2010 only race" and had the hp cap at 1557, clearly the host is trying to establish a one-make race. Thats fine. And the title can reflect the specific taste the race is after. I can also see a 400hp limit getting knocked up to 401 because someone really wants to use their favorite car and they cant tune it below the 401. (Though, personally I would love trying to take a favorite car in a 500hp class even if 99 hp behind. The loss wouldnt hurt so much, and the win would be infinitely more gratifying.)
Unfortunately, this makes up a very small segment of these 'oddly chosen' hp or weight limitations. Sure enough, the host is almost always sitting on the peak hp for the limitation, and right on the weight minimum.
Are we really that insecure about our tuning or our racing ability that we have to ensure that NOONE can have better power-to-weight than us?
I will say that it wont stop me from joining. Sometimes I can dominate the host, and toss a wrench in their plans, and sometimes I walk away with my arse in my hands, tail between legs.
Frankly, I dont give a darn if I lose. Im not advocating some sort of sissy 'its how you play the game' mentality. If I lost, then I realize I am doing something wrong. Either I bought and built a car that cannot stand up to other people in the segment, or my driving in general is inferior and needs improvement, or maybe my experience with the specific vehicle I was driving isn't up to par yet.
If I always dominated power-to-weight, then it would great reduce my ability to get better, AND it would lose a lot of playability. I find myself having a lot more fun laughing with a group of drivers as I trail a half-lap behind in a clean, well matched race... rather than leading in a group of grief filled hotheads.
I dont know, I dont think that the answer lays in any change by PD. I suppose its something that can only be found in establishing your own racing circles with people that enjoy more than winning. The people that want to win the clubman cup with the x2010 can form there own and all argue over hp caps being set to their cars.
I'm sure I'm not the only one that gets a chuckle over the 'host-setting-limitations-to-their-car' races as they peruse the open lobby looking for one to join. But honestly, are they really enjoying themselves. It puzzles me that these individuals make up the majority.
I suppose I'm lucky to have found this community, that values hearty, clean racing.
================>>CLIFFNOTES<<================
It makes me chuckle to see the majority of open lobby races have odd hp values (such as 559hp) rather than setting the room up for 600hp cap. Hosts must be very insecure to set limitations so that their car is at the top of the power-to-weight ratio.