Porsche Chop.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Super-Supra
  • 26 comments
  • 907 views

Super-Supra

(Banned)
Messages
4,111
291003-COMP10.jpg


Comments please.
 
it's pretty good, but the wheels. blue wheels on a porsche looks odd. check you PMS supra:D
 
Well then the photographer sucks ass (yes, sucks ass) if he can't capture a photo without a bunch of ****ty blur.

I can't tell how good it is because you added the horrible blur.
 
Too much blur.. If you can't chop and have to hide your mistakes in blur, I'd suggest you concentrate on something else. Otherwise get rid of the blur.
 
Originally posted by teazR
Too much blur.. If you can't chop and have to hide your mistakes in blur, I'd suggest you concentrate on something else. Otherwise get rid of the blur.


Who said he cant chop? And the only way he would improve if he is still learning is to practice, not quit. Go smoke some dog turd or something.
 
Ok I guess i did put some wrong words there..
I meant if you don't have the patience to chop it properly don't hide it in blur.
 
Try using Wind next time for the background, it has a better effect. Do Wind from left and depending on how fast, you determine the power.
 
Too much blur...and the big banner with your name on it takes up a ****load of space...but apart from that, it looks good.
 
Spend more time on your next "chop" please. This looks like it was done in 5-10 minutes tops.
 
Doesn't appeal to me at all. All I see done to this Porshe is the blue on the rims and the blur effect.
 
Well, maybe I could get a better look at your work if you didn't cover up all your mistakes by sticking on a tacky motion blur..:rolleyes:
 
It's good. Just way too blurry. It's obvious that it's not moving though. Should've put some motion blur in the wheels more. Looks good all around.
 
Here's a tip;
In real photography, you don't get 100% blurryness in a picture (well, if you're any kind of a photographer). So, when you blurr the whole picture to simulate motion it looks bad. Next time, try either blurring just the car, or just the background, because when you blurr both it looks horrible.
 
I ruined my RX-8 desktop by putting a blurred version of it at the bottom... Don't use motion blur.
 
i didn't really think it was all that bad....
 
hey mister e can u post a pic of your wallpaper i wana see it please thanks
 
Originally posted by Ryan
Well, maybe I could get a better look at your work if you didn't cover up all your mistakes by sticking on a tacky motion blur..:rolleyes:

Almost exactly my words.
 
blurryness is created by two things, DOF (Depth of Field) and exposure time. When you are taking pictures of moving cars, you have to decrease the exposure time so that you dont get blur (exposure time is how long the shutter is open exposing light to the film, if an object is moving fast, you get blur because it was in more than 1 spot while the shutter was open). To slow an exposure setting will get you "motion blur" which looks absolutely nothing like the blur you have, you just like gausian blurred the whole thing....... Other than the aweful blur its pretty nice tho... just thought I'd give u some pointers...



(btw, dof is what makes the things in the background of a picture blurry and the things in front crisp, you can change the depth of field and field of view so that objects close to the camera are blurred the further away they become, which obviously doesnt apply in this situation)
 
Wow! I think everyone has pretty much said what I was going to say, excluding the people that liked it.
 
Back