- 4,558

- Australia
Hi there.
I really don't know what it possesing me to do this, but why is the
(or : boggled: ) emoticon not just ":s" instead?
We have
(or : ) ),
(or : ( ),
(or : p ), and
(or : D ), so following the same protocol of using ":" as sets of eyes (instead of the "=" variety) and the symbol after it representing the mouth, wouldn't it make more sense, as the
icon has a "s" shaped mouth anyway? Lower case would be used to fit in with the
(or : p).
On the same token,
could be ":\" and
could be "
".
Wouldn't this streemline the emoticon system and rid the site of stray ":s"s , ":\"s and "
"s?
I'm really sorry I opened this thread.....again, I have no idea why I felt compelled to write in. :s ....er - I mean
-
.
I really don't know what it possesing me to do this, but why is the
We have
On the same token,
Wouldn't this streemline the emoticon system and rid the site of stray ":s"s , ":\"s and "
I'm really sorry I opened this thread.....again, I have no idea why I felt compelled to write in. :s ....er - I mean
Last edited: