RM vs all aero parts? (poll added)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greisen
  • 5 comments
  • 680 views

Which is fastest? RM and fully tuned or all aeroparts and fully tuned?

  • RM and fully tuned

    Votes: 23 85.2%

  • All aeroparts and fully tuned

    Votes: 2 7.4%

  • Pretty much the same

    Votes: 2 7.4%
  • Total voters
    27
Greisen

Greisen

Messages
480
Denmark
Denmark
Messages
Greisen
hey dudes, wondered about this today when i bought the tvr tuscan speed 6 to RM it. What do you think would be fastes? Fully tuned with all aero parts or RM and fully tuned?

Obviously the RM should be faster. But with how much? And would it be the money worth to RM it instead of putting everything on if you were progressing at low levels? (value for money)
 
RM is far faster than non RM.

-More downforce (2-5 times)
-Less weight
-Higher base grip multiplier(? - speculation)

As far if it's worth it, it depends. It's not hard winning races in A-Spec. I like to get them over with as quickly as possible though (I race online) so I would always buy RM. To be honest, they are pretty cheap. Do a seasonal or two and you should more than enough.
 
They are "race modified" so it would be contradictory if the street mod versions were faster.

I agree with the above post as to why. Base grip multiplier?
 
stormbringer
I agree with the above post as to why. Base grip multiplier?
Click to expand...

The theory is that each car has a hidden stat that determines some portion of its grip. You can kind of see it sometime when comparing similar cars. You pretty much always get the same skidpad g as long as tires and downforce are the same, yet some cars can corner faster than others.

I think GT3 had one of the clearest examples, the Viper GTS-R if I'm not mistaken could corner a bit faster than the C5R and other cars.
 
Rm has the same aero as the full aero kit and is much lighter.
 
Back