Somebody's pissed about how their research turned out....

  • Thread starter Thread starter skip0110
  • 16 comments
  • 500 views
skip0110

skip0110

Messages
5,178
United States
Worcester, MA
Messages
skip0110
Stumbled upon this by accident....it seems this undergrad is rather irate about the results he got.....
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~kovar/hall.html
(warning, strong language inside, dont let your mom see it, she will wash your mouth with soap)
 
Off Topic- Parliaments suck, I hate the filter too!
 
that is the only thing I like about parliaments is the filter. . . you can bite down on it without it getting siggy. . . the cigarette suckinnates though. . .
 
"I Still wouldn't have any chicks, but at least I'd be rolling in Cash" Haha.
 
at 3 packs for 11.something and 1 pack for 5.09, this is the best deal in mass. therefore i smoke them anyway. and the menthols arent that bad.
 
Originally posted by skip0110
at 3 packs for 11.something and 1 pack for 5.09, this is the best deal in mass. therefore i smoke them anyway. and the menthols arent that bad.
Click to expand...
Do you feel gay walking up to the register an asking for a pack of Parliaments??? :lol:
 
:lol: i couldn't care less, i have actually bought those "capris" once and a while, just because i though they looked cool. "faggot cigarettes" i call them.
 
Real Men Smoke:

pall_mall.jpg


Yeah, that's a man.
 
DAMN, I should have done my ITM100 essay like this. My research topic had absolutely no info on it either. In the end, I spent a good 12 hours coming up with purely bull**** inferences when I could have just insulted the prof for giving me such a ****ty topic. Hell, I could have also gone to the prof and asked to borrow about 15 grand since that's how much it would have cost me to gain access to about 1/2 of the info I was looking for (Business research papers)
 
Damn! how much are Marbs and Newports there? There only like 5 something here in NY and I thought that was expensive. They get cheaper the more south you go though.
 
yup
I get Camels for 2.86 a pack : )
 
How bout I send you some $$ and you send me some smokes :lol:
 
Originally posted by Squid
How bout I send you some $$ and you send me some smokes :lol:
Click to expand...
no probs :lol:
 
one thing I can say: This guy has no idea what science is really about. When you test something, you're not trying to get a specific result, more like trying to see what the results would be (of course, I could be missing a completely sarchastic side to this; I never was good at picking up blatant parodical nonsense in comparison to shear stupidity in the face of common errors). Anyway, here's another observation about his work; the line in his scatter plot is TOTALLY OFF! I mean, look at it! if anything that is not an exponential decrease (if it is, then I'd say that around 400 degrees Kelvin, the material being tested will have no friction at all). To tell the truth, I don't know why this is funny; I'd like to find out who the heck that guy is and smack the beJesus out of him...
 
Originally posted by Jpec07
one thing I can say: This guy has no idea what science is really about. When you test something, you're not trying to get a specific result, more like trying to see what the results would be (of course, I could be missing a completely sarchastic side to this; I never was good at picking up blatant parodical nonsense in comparison to shear stupidity in the face of common errors). Anyway, here's another observation about his work; the line in his scatter plot is TOTALLY OFF! I mean, look at it! if anything that is not an exponential decrease (if it is, then I'd say that around 400 degrees Kelvin, the material being tested will have no friction at all). To tell the truth, I don't know why this is funny; I'd like to find out who the heck that guy is and smack the beJesus out of him...
Click to expand...
:p I think you did take it way too seriously. He's trying to verify an existing result, and his ****ty equipment gave him equally ****ty results. Read the paper, he said that the best-fit line was a joke. And he's measuring electrical resistance, not friction.
 
Originally posted by Jpec07
one thing I can say: This guy has no idea what science is really about. When you test something, you're not trying to get a specific result, more like trying to see what the results would be (of course, I could be missing a completely sarchastic side to this; I never was good at picking up blatant parodical nonsense in comparison to shear stupidity in the face of common errors). Anyway, here's another observation about his work; the line in his scatter plot is TOTALLY OFF! I mean, look at it! if anything that is not an exponential decrease (if it is, then I'd say that around 400 degrees Kelvin, the material being tested will have no friction at all). To tell the truth, I don't know why this is funny; I'd like to find out who the heck that guy is and smack the beJesus out of him...
Click to expand...

and to further back up his line

I drew an exponential through my noise. I believe the apparent legitimacy is enhanced by the fact that I used a complicated computer program to make the fit.
Click to expand...
 
Can't resist a Virgina Slim.
 
Back