I fail to see your point.
Are you bitching simply because the Air is successful despite all odds and the Sony was not? Because it would be pretty ballsy to complain about the Air for things the Sony already did wrong (and continues to do wrong with the TZ series).
Its not me that was bitching, this was coming strait from Sony when the macbook air came out... all the journalists turned to Vaio for their response after the air was announced to see what Sony had planned to 1up them...
Sony replied that they had done a thinner laptop years before and that the air was by no means innovative, especially with regard to it being the 'thinnest laptop' Sony also said that their thin laptop didn't make any waves at all in the market and they found that consumers were not willing to pay stupidly more just because it was thin, it proved to Sony that this was an unsuccessful market bracket and not viable to bother with..
As a result Vaio wont be making some thinner come back...Vaio are now going the opposite direction with laptops that are so bloody huge they are hardly considered portable! I guess thats where they wana go!
Sony still maintain that Apple is being silly going into such a nice market with the air, whats wrong with a macbook pro? The price vs performance vs thinness just doesn't add up... i.e. Sony think the air will flop.
Now what they say and what happens is a totally different story.. the air does have a wow factor but for people who really need some computing power they can see that its not offering a lot for such a high price.
But then people don't want it. Besides, you can't single out the Macbook Air for being competitive with other superportable laptops.
People do want it! The macbook pro is still selling fine and so are other superportable laptops which are slighty thicker. Not everyone will see the point of the air, actually the first reception from the media was quite poor, they didn't see who would buy the air at such a steep price but they are selling so..
Being competitive its not simply saying, look we have made something thinner... they think its a competitive move and fair enough but people also what value for money and good specs. Its selling but by no means dominating.
It you look at their advert its all about the amazing fits in an envelope thing... it seems thats all they are pushing with it...its thin its thin! is that to cover up the fact its basically nothing more innovative than just that feature?
Some people what more than just thin!!!!
Thats the first raging stereotype that came into mind...
Robin