Suzuki Kizashi aiming for 200M/H at Bonneville.

  • Thread starter Thread starter GT_Prologue5
  • 42 comments
  • 4,806 views

Do you think it can hit 200M/H?

  • Yes.

    Votes: 14 63.6%
  • No.

    Votes: 8 36.4%

  • Total voters
    22
  • Poll closed .
Suzuki's U.K. lineup is probably better than what we've got over here. The only notable car we've gotten in the past 10 years from them are the SX4 and the Grand Vitara. Everything else was either rebadged Chevys, rebadged Daewoos, or both.
 
I'm glad we never got a Daewoo-badged Suzuki here... would have hurt their rep so badly they would have folded.

Suzuki makes excellent small cars. Emphasis on small. The Swift has less rear seat space than just about everything else and the Alto is basically a tin can with four seats. Even the Jimny is ludicrously tiny... great off-roader... just as long as you don't have to carry camping gear!

But emphasis on excellent. There's nothing quite like the Jimny off-road, the Swift's dynamics can still be held in high regard against newcomers like the Mazda2 and Fiesta and the Alto is just silly fun for something so small... and it gets a kajillion miles per gallon, too.
 
Yep, the UK Suzuki lineup looks very sad, at least from what I've read in TopGear.

This was bad enough, but to answer to "What's a rhetorical question"? And to answer it wrongly? Jebus.

Suzuki's cars are all pretty good examples of cars in that segment. I just had no idea they did a car in the Mondeo/6 segment because we don't get it.
 

Suzuki's cars are all pretty good examples of cars in that segment. I just had no idea they did a car in the Mondeo/6 segment because we don't get it.

That's a shame actually, because from what I've read in reviews, the Kizashi is actually a brilliant car. It comes with a 131kw 2.4L petrol 4cyl, a manual transmission as standard (how many mid-sized sedans can boast that even as an option?) and the chassis and handling are actually supposed to be really good. Plus I think it actually looks pretty good.
Edit: Oh, and it does indeed come with AWD as an option, but sadly not in Australia. The AWD can be disengaged to save fuel (supposedly).
 
That thing is gonna need serious aero and lightening work to bust 203 with only 500hp. The ZR1 has 650+, and can do "only" 211.

Yet the F40 managed 201 with 'only' 471bhp.
 
That's a shame actually, because from what I've read in reviews, the Kizashi is actually a brilliant car. It comes with a 131kw 2.4L petrol 4cyl, a manual transmission as standard (how many mid-sized sedans can boast that even as an option?).
Almost all of them, actually. They usually just don't come with a manual for V6 cars, which doesn't apply to the Kizashi because it doesn't have one.
 
This was bad enough, but to answer to "What's a rhetorical question"? And to answer it wrongly? Jebus.

Oh...*winces hardly* that post makes me look like an idiot.
 
Almost all of them, actually. They usually just don't come with a manual for V6 cars, which doesn't apply to the Kizashi because it doesn't have one.

Crap, you're right, when did this happen?!:lol:
 
Isn't there an AWD version of the Kizashi? I wonder if their top speed runner is FWD or AWD. I'd love to see 500hp is a FWD family car.:lol:
OT, but we are there in the TL world. 479whp/470ftlb & shooting for 500 by end of the year. :)
 
Oh yeah, it broke 200. Hit 203.720M/H, and beat the class record by 1.4M/H.
Congrats to Suzuki!
 
Here's the video of the 203mph run.

 
Back