Techy's Car Reviews | Lancy Delta

  • Thread starter Techy
  • 44 comments
  • 6,531 views
6,776
United States
Florida
gtamann123
Techy's Car Reviews​

Hello, and welcome to my Car Reviews! Before we begin indulging on the world of GT5 by usage of words, I must debrief some important stuff.

Firstly, do not take my reviews too seriously. As like all reviews in the world, they only provide an idea of how well a product is. Plus, they are completely based on the person's opinions. If you would like to really see a car's abilities, get your rear off the computer/phone & boot up GT5.

Secondly, the updates. I predict I'll get at least 3 reviews in a week. Maybe more, maybe less. But don't cry your eyeballs out if it is less. I have no guarantee that I will update the Reviews daily, nor weekly. All I can really imply is to be patient, and wait for the next review to come surfing in.

Finally, I am able to take in some criticism, but please let it be constructive. Requests are also accepted. I'll gladly test cars tuned from tuning groups, and so forth. If not I'll pick one out, whether it is from a tuning body or not.

Now that has been said, let's rock and roll!!!

And Enjoy! :cheers:







[P] = Premium | = Standard
Super GT Series
Consists of any and all Super GTs that is present in GT5, including GT300s & GT500s.

Toyota Castrol TOM's SUPRA '97 [P] - GT500
Toyota YellowHat YMS Supra '05 [P] - GT500


Fiction LM Race Cars
Consists of all fiction LM race cars.

Nissan Fairlady Z Concept LM Race Car
Honda S2000 LM Race Car


Historic Automobiles
Consists of any vehicles before the 70s.

Jaguar XJ13 Race Car '66 [P]



Tuners
Consists of vehicles that has been tuned by a major tuning group/company.

Spoon (Honda) S2000 Race Car #95 '00


Alfa Romeo
Alfa Romeo 8C Competizione '08 [P]


Specialty Tuners
Consists of vehicles that has been tuned by a tuning group on the lovely GTP.


Lancia
Lancia HF Integrale Evoluzione I '91 [P]

 
Last edited:
Toyota Castrol TOM's SUPRA '97 [P] - GT500
The #36 car that dethroned the GT-R!

Nicknamed by myself: Surfin' Bird!

scaled.php



Route X Speed Testing
0-60 mph: 3.419 seconds
0-100 mph: 6.907 seconds
0-1/4 mile: 11.320 seconds
0-1 mile: 27.980 seconds
Top Speed: 187.3 mph
Max. G Force: 0.88 G​


Before I start, you may ask why I chose this to be my first car to review. Because Race Car!!


All I can say is this: This car is utter car porn. Who cannot resist its lustrous beauty? And it is based off of the Mark IV Supra! I have no reluctance to say that the livery promotes the car's luxury. Gladly designed by TOM's, a factory-supported racing team, it depicts that it can ride the waves like it was a living human surfer! If only GT5 had a Photomode location where water will just blast onto the car while it's speeding at +100 mph. It will just slice through the water like it was a buttered knife! Perhaps even surf over it! Let's face it: If it can ride the waves, it can ride the cold, damp pavement. Is such a thing even possible? Damn right!

The interior also plus the appearance as well. It is sleek and intricate, never cluttered of knobs and buttons. All there is the dashboard and your hands clutched tightly onto the steering wheel. The funny thing is the windshield isn't small at all. At least not as tiny as the GT by Citroen's. Even the windshield wiper is too cute to neglect. The downside is how dark it is. I have not driven this car in pure darkness so I'm sure the dashboard lights up, but during the day it's nothing but pitch black (it is actually the color of the material). But I think it can be remedied with EV.


She gallops with 2.1L 4-cylinder 4T-GTE with a turbo (the same engine family used for Toyota's WRC & Group B cars), and 1150kg of weight. For me I thought the car was ran with a V8, but only 4 cylinders? Well, butter my biscuits! But how well does it run on the track day? That's right: Super GT Seasonal, Nur GP/F. Let's roll!!



To conclude: Simply marvelous! But that is typical for a Race car, eh?

Starting Grid
  1. Nissan Xanavi Nismo GT-R
  2. Nissan YellowHat GT-R
  3. Nissan Calsonic Impul GT-R
  4. Lexus DENSO DUNLOP SARD SC430
  5. Lexus Petrona's Tom's SC430
  6. Nissan Woodone Advan Clarion GT-R
  7. Honda Raybrig NSX
  8. Honda Arta NSX
  9. Honda Takata Dome NSX
  10. Toyota YellowHat Supra
  11. Lexus Bandai Direzza SC430
  12. Me
All premiums.​

On the 1st lap, I overtook 3 cars. On the 2nd lap I overtook 4 cars. On the 3rd lap I overtook 1 car. And on the 4th & 5th laps I overtook the pole car. But not once did it ever failed on me. Announcer, Incoming! I'm just kidding. Or am I?

In Castrol until the end of Mercedes-Arena, it maintained excellent posture. Admittedly I went wide on these turns, but the car still managed to neighbor the apex. Observing closely I regulated 50-65 mph of cornering speed, but the liftoffs was tremendous! At RTL the car broke ~130 mph no-sweat. Then the sweeping Ford-Kurve closed in, so I braked just a little around 80 mph for the first turn and a sweet 50-60 mph on the turn itself. Once again, as determined as a kitten playing with yarn. The straight after pushed the Surfin' bird to ~140 mph, before braking in just a couple of meters outside of Dunlop-Kehre. Diving inside was of course smooth.

Then there's the infamous Schumacher-S, destined for someone to flat it out consistently. Too bad for me, I smashed down to 90 mph but landed in the sand several times. Though the liftoff launched the thing off afterwards. The two turns Kumbo- & Bit-Kurves: Gloriously finished. But my honing ceased when I landed in the sand following Bit-Kurve. But I brought myself to life seconds later. The kink was easily negotiable, and squeezed out +140 mph before braking lightly into Veedol. And finally, the Coca-Cola-Kurve. And it was indeed like a shaken and opened bubbly soda!

Rinse and repeat (gotta make sure I use soap, too!). And let me tell you that the rivals even begged to let me pass. Oh, the superiority.

The fabulous thing about this car is its braking. Even a slight tap will reduce its speed down drastically. And that facet was powerfully exhibited. Then there is the liftoffs. Unfortunately I do not have Route X yet, but I can tell this Surfin' Bird accelerates like a bird taking off (pun?)! It's quite quick yet concise. Finally the car's cornering. Oh, how truly magnificent it demonstrates this! It is hands-down balanced. Not too much understeer nor oversteer. It is also a bit forgiving than most Super GTs, and does not need to be driven in the hands of a smooth, concentrated driver. I think its drivetrain -- an FR -- contributed in its abilities, as the weight up front weighed down more grip on the front tires when braking or turning. Its torque is also perfect. It is notable to still gather wheelspin however.

Now for the advanced stuff. Close your eyes, kids! Anyways, weight transfer is little of notice. It isn't as extreme as a drugged Monster Truck, but as leveled and relaxing like a house on wheels. The 1150kg weight played a vital role in its performance here today. It was enough to place adhesion to the tires, and enough to suspend body rolls. Power/Weight ratio is a clean 0.4461, HP at 513 (includes Oil change), and torque almost 500 ft-lb. Compared to the YellowHat Supra -- which is a more modern concept of the GT500 Supra: It generates less HP, but has less weight. Surprisingly both are very close in P/W ratio. But the YellowHat will boast since it has a 60 kg advantage. Even under this improvement this car never ceases to amaze me.

It's engine & exhaust notes is what this car is easily distinguishable for. It may sound like a hair dryer -- as all other GT5 cars hideously retain, but it can be quite... lyrical. It's deep, and damp. It tries to uproar when expected, but drops down in shame. It explodes with remarks to its enemies, with straight-cut gears and turbos.
I dunno... It's tough to describe the sound. All I can say, is that it releases aggression, but emits joy as well. Such a combo is unique. And its beckoning is forever secured in its rightful throne.


It can be purchased in the NCD for 900k smackaroonies or won in the Extreme Hall, B-Spec Super GT.



Final Scores
Appearance: Definite car porn. Just wrapped over racing stuff. Or more specifically, surfing gear. 10/10
Power: 2.1L. 4-cylinder. Turbocharged. Yet it can go to speeds up to 160 mph, maybe more. Accel. is also top-notch, esp. in liftoffs. But I have feelings that it can go a bit faster (don't touch the Turbo Kits!). 9/10
Ability: Corners amazingly well. Well centered, no mishaps. Considerate on a course of driving styles. 10/10
Worth: Highly recommended! Although it is no different than the other Super GTs that overloads the car list. 8/10
Merry-Go-Round (Fun): Quite joyful to drive, but its grippy nature is not always a factor. 9/10
Ease: It is a very controlled car, so it won't bite at all! 10/10
Record Player (Sound): It's quite unique, actually. But it is not a roaring as a yelping tiger, though. 8.5/10

Total: 64.5/70


To Conclude: Super GTs are always entertaining to drive & spectate. The Castrol Supra is no different. It turns well, it blasts with efficiency, and can be in the hands of a forgiving soul. I have no doubt that this is a must in everyone's virtual driveway!


Pictures released later!
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the responses, guys! :cheers:


Toyota YellowHat YMS Supra '05 [P] - GT500
The last hurrah to run the Supra...


When I first saw this car's name, I thought it would actually have a Yellow Hat glued on the rooftop :lol: Anyways, this car isn't as drastic from the '97 version I reviewed. However, they are several changes to be aerodynamically lighter. Like there is a canopy added, wheel arches extended, diffuser pushed back some (is there even one?), spoiler flattened, rims changed, and more. If I had to choose which is better: The '97, or the '05. Arguably, I'd choose the Castrol. The '97 model just looks a bit more sleek. Even the wrapping AKA livery is dominant here. However the yellow finish is acceptable, and dat Stick figure (Genki) that populates the car is adowable!

The interior's pretty strange, honestly. I mean, I preferred it to be a lot better if the dashboard was situated behind the wheel, not on it. Even it is brighter. It is kind however to include a last lap time. The design is very simple. You can see a vent near the driver, but that's pretty much it. Not being cluttered is one thing, but at least have some stuff that actually make the interior look attractive. Heck, maybe add in some knobs or something! What's worse is the bars that blocks the windshield. Safety: A. View of the road: D. You can still see what's Out There, just the bars limits what I can see simultaneously. At least the wipers is still teeny and cute.. In comparison to the '97 version, this car actually loses. But not by too much. Although I simply loved the '97's interior. In addition, once you rev up the engine it is utterly quiet in the cockpit.


The car benefits in being a bit lighter than the Castrol: 60kg. Torque also is a bit lower, which plus in control. But the hugest change is the engine: A 3UZ-FE V8. You may expect the V8 to perform outrageously better, but the HP figure tells a different story: +473, or 485 (w/ oil change). While this isn't the first time the GT500 Supra had a complete engine change, the performance may or may not be retained. The only way to find out: Nur (I'm on this track again because for comparison to Castrol Supra), Super GT Seasonal. Yeaay Yaaaahhh!!

Starting Grid
  1. Xanavi Nismo GT-R
  2. Nissan YellowHat GT-R
  3. Nissan Calsonic Impul GT-R
  4. Lexus Denso Dunlop Sard SC430
  5. Lexus Petrona's Tom's SC430
  6. Nissan Woodone GT-R
  7. Honda Raybrig NSX
  8. Honda Arta NSX
  9. Honda Takata Dome NSX
  10. Copy of Myself
  11. Lexus Bandai Direzza SC430
  12. Me

And off we go!!

On the first lap, I overtake my first opponent, The Bandai SC430. Drafting made such a thing possible.

scaled.php

Oh, hello twin brother! How nice to see you in this fine race! May I take your position? What!? Why not?? Y'know what, you're not my bro! You're too competitive! I'll take away your place as a punishment!

scaled.php

The corners afterwards was concise and fortuitous. It feels almost like the Castrol, but on some turns like Mercedes-Arena, it maintains a bit higher speed.

Following after Schumacher-S, an NSX closes in. Once again, drafting FTW.

scaled.php

The slow sweepers Bit- and Kumbo-Kurves was also noticeably quicker. But not to a huge extent. Although if I must, it has a slightly slower liftoff than the '97. But that is understandable as it does have lower torque.

Here comes another NSX. Whom is now sent to the grave!

scaled.php

Veedol was zappy, Coca-Cola was destructive. And now overheads, a straight. Beforehand I caught eye of 3 other AI in one jumbled battle, and I came in to crash the party.

What's up, guys?

scaled.php

'Nother down.

scaled.php

The hairpin on that pic was very fierce. But the YellowHat handled it very nicely. Its form always levels to the road, and speeds up without thinking.

Now the story on this pic:! I pulled up right behind the Calsonic after the last turn and we just glued together, until I notice that I'm going faster than Supra's ultimate rival, the GT-R!

scaled.php

He did take action and late braked, but still my own integrity was on the masses, and so did the car!

Ooo, look! The Yellow Hats gladly betrayed on the Supra and secretly made a paint job for the GT-R. How shameful..

scaled.php

Suddenly, right after Hatzenbects, the rear tires landed in the grass instead of the rumble strip, and immediately lost control. Quick swerves did not help, and instead skid through the opposite grass, knocking over the distance markers. And at the same time, the betray-ist passing. I clenched my teeth, and tried to squirm right out of the grass. Moments later, I managed and caught right onto the coward's rear bumper on Castrol-S.

scaled.php


scaled.php

A lap later, a Xanavi appeared in my fiery eyes. It is time to pay!!

He was no match for my dastardly movements, and so I made intentional contact on his rear bumper. How is that for unscrupulous inaction?

scaled.php

Then time slows down. All there is now is me, and this GT-R.

Tick..
Tock..
Tick..
Tock..
Tick..
Tock..
Tick..

And... Whammo! Piece of crap clang right onto me on this straight, but it was straightforward that I would be victorious!

scaled.php


Win!

scaled.php


All I can say is that was a marvelous race! Just as marvelous as the Castrol's! But they were some things that the YellowHat subtly succeeded in.

Firstly, forgiveness. Surfin' Bird was very forgiving, but Yellow Hat forgave just a bit more. Believe me, there was some turns I accidentally miss my braking point. But a flick on the wheel and stepping fingers onto the brakes just flipped the car aside. And then there was the mishap in the race today. While it is instinctive on what to do in a tight situation, the car was actually the one that assisted on my extrication the most.

Secondly, facilitation. In fact, the YellowHat was easier to drive than the Castrol. Though not by a long shot. The factors that contributed was its lowered torque, however it greatly impacted how quick it can be in liftoffs. Then there's the statement in GT5's description of its rear being stiffer. That could explain how sharp the car moves. And the weight. Obviously this reduction posed many pros and cons, and one of them is its cornering ability, improving even more. It is noticeable in slow sectors like Castrol-S, or Dunlop-Kehre.

Finally, power. From '97 to '05, the engine was moved up to a V8. Further information tells it is 4.3L, and is sequentially fuel-injected, sharing 4 values per cylinder. However such a improvement isn't too drastic. It still retains the top speed the '97 had on Nur: +160mph. Unfortunately, I can't tell about the accel., since I don't have Route X. Its gearbox isn't too different, either. More or less a bit longer setup.


It's engine & exhaust notes is actually a bit worse than the '97. Admittedly I liked the personifying shrieks on the '97, and YellowHat Supra exhibits something a bit interlacing. The V8 absolutely implemented that gruesome noise V8s always has, but something about it feels awfully cold. It's almost like it yelps, instead of roaring but failing. It also sounds a bit more muffled.



It can be bought for 900,000 Credits in the NCD.


Final Scores
Appearance: Still car porn, but it lost its virtue when the surfing gear was replaced with Yellow Hats. Though it still looks amazing! 10/10
Power: From a small 4-cylinder to a king-size V8, I say it's a nice improvement. Although the performance in the race today isn't too intensive. 8.5/10
Ability: Corners pleasantly. No faults, no redundancies. However it is a bit sharper but lost some liftoff speed. 10/10
Worth: It's just a more modern idea of the Supra during its term in Super GT. However it is nice to keep a model for its final year in Super GT racing. 9/10
Merry-Go-Round: Quite joyful to drive in. Though it is no different than its other classmates. 9/10
Ease: Make sure you give it a hat! 10/10
Record Player: It's muffled, and sounds a bit cold. Although the V8 boosted the overall sounds. 7/10

Total: 63.5/70

To Conclude: Certainly, it is basically the same as the '97 version. But they are some modest changes that are worth discovering. Little to none is lost in this model, so its memories still encloses in the bucket seats. Just make sure you gift it lots of Yellow Hats!​
 
“If you built the fastest racing car on land,



one that throws aside all rules and regulations,



what would that car look like, how would it perform,



and how would it feel to drive?”

- Kazunori Yamauchi





Wait for it...


Drum roll, please!


Here it comes!



Gran Turismo Red Bull X2010 [P] - S. Vettel Livery


Review Removed!
 
Last edited:
Nissan Fairlady Z Concept LM Race Car - Fiction LM

scaled.php


This car doesn't look half-bad. It sports the renown white/blue/red tricolor livery with Exxon Mobile, and is an excellent combo for the Fairlady. It has very little sponsors, so it is mostly clean of ads and such. The only things that populate the car is its representative symbols like the Z, its car number "75", and so on. And if you look hard enough, there is a small memorabilia on the car sides that shows who drove the car. Doesn't really make sense, since this is a fictitious car.. Or am I forgetting something?

The design is quite attractive. The rear wheel arches are extruded out to cohere air fluency. At the front, you'll see a super-sized vent. They are many more, but most of them are common in body kitting. The car is made entirely in carbon fiber, and has extensions implemented to add downforce. Like tampered spoilers, moldings, etc. It's such a simple idea, yet so lovely to admire. The rims themselves are even simple!

The interior is of course, black; a way to compliment cockpit usage. The windshield is pretty small, but you could still look through it well enough. The steering wheel blocks most of the viewing angles, sadly.

Under the hood, the engine is a VQ35 (V6) 3.5 L DOHC engine with turbochargers, producing 597 HP. It is an FR. Torque goes up to 600 ft-lb, and weighs only 1120 kg. That means it has a P/W ratio of 0.533. Of course, the numbers will vary on maintenance and mileage (my car is clocked at 1080 mi). But looking closely at the listed stats, I say it'll perform marvelously. 1120 kg is a fair amount, and 597 HP made the entire car sound a bit more scrumptious. But there is the FR drivetrain. Weight will usually transfer more to the front, since the engine bay is placed at the front. But the car has a high torque in a low RPM range -- 5000 -- while the redline is at around 7200. This makes liftoffs a bit more effective, but at the cost of wheelspin. Since the front will obtain more adhesion than the rear in a course of scenarios, grip will probably get lost at the rear a bit quicker. The only way to find out is to take a Tour into Le Mans!

scaled.php
scaled.php

scaled.php
scaled.php

scaled.php


After 3 laps, its mobility was just as I expected. It was balanced, and certainly sound as a falling feather. But that was the optimism in race cars, eh? But, there is a couple of things I would like to mention.

First, the car's weight transfer. I was indeed correct about the grip going more onto the front than the back, but there still wasn't any major grip loss in the rear. While the changes in grip is barely noticeable, it is safe to say that the car does not suffer too badly in its FR layout. In liftoffs however, the rear tires does gather wheelspin and makes it a tad difficult to manipulate velocity. Another thing is the tires sometimes cannot handle complex loads too well. For instance at the Porsche Curves, it gradually collected understeer and nearly wiped out at the end of the series of turns.

Second, the car's acceleration & braking. On Mulsanne, I pushed the car to around 190 mph, which is pretty high for a V6. And how it got there was impressive, also. The gear ratios all played a fine tune to effectively increase speed at the quickest way possible. Not one felt too long nor short. The car's brakes was ventilation discs, so I think that contributed the most in its braking. At extremes, the speedometer clocked down very quickly, usable as a quick recover from overshooting turns. Light braking was just as powerful!


Other than that, nothing was wrong with the car. Little to no faults was spotted, and I think it will have a lot of potential if ran for serious Endurance races. The quickest time I got was around 3:50. Pretty slow, but I was having a joy careening with this thing!


The engine & exhaust sounds was sadly, a hair dryer. Nothing felt unique, except for that buildup when you shift up (ohh, a rhyme!).


Final Scores
Appearance: Very attractive. It can woe down many people, even if it is a racing machine. 10/10
Power: I really like how a turbo V6 was able to exhale almost 600 HP, and exhibited that ridiculously cool on track day. The 1120kg of weight made things even more flavoring :dopey: 10/10
Ability: Very, very centered. It can lose its consistency from time to time, but failures can be forgotten easily. 10/10
Worth: Going for 1 million bucks, it might as well vary if you are willing to either A) Wait for it to show in the UCD/OCD. Or B) Gold B-Spec 1000km Suzuka. Although the car isn't 100% worth its tangibility. 9/10
Merry-Go-Round: It can be lots of fun if taken to serious races. Otherwise, it is actually peaceful to drive in. Eventually, the grip will masquerade as a bad mark. 9/10
Ease: I don't think it'll eat you :sly: 10/10
Record Player: Meh. I don't really like it. 5/10
Total Score: 63/70

To Conclude: Another wonderful car to drive. From the small experiences today, I can tell it'll have a mass of potential if it was chosen as an Enduro car. It has pretty much everything of what a full-fledged race car needs to have!


Images by Technicolors
 
Another great review! I'll be looking for the Fairlady LM in the UCD. It always looked like a nice car to drive, but now I know for sure it's a good car.

~Turtle
turtle.gif
 
Don't forget that ladies love shoes. Get that Fairlady LM some new shoes in GT Auto. It looked good before but with new rims it's an even better looker. Nice review. It's one of my fav fictitious cars as I loved the old IMSA 300zx's in this livery.
 
Spoon (Honda) S2000 Race Car #95 '00 - Tuner

6864847295_0576eb24a7.jpg


This car has a successful racing history. GT5 describes that it entered the 1999 9hr Tsukuba, and won 1st in class & 2nd overall. Then it entered the 2000 24hr Nurburgring and won 1st in class, 32nd overall. It also entered in the Super Taikyu series, and categorized as Class 4. This automatically implies that this is very prominent in stamina and balance. Even its appearance emphasizes its true power!

Spoon always tuned Honda's very finely, making sure it succeeds in performance and comfort. One of their main targets is the S2000. This model was developed as a racing vehicle, hence its entrance in major race events.

Spoonlogo.png

Spoon Sport's logo.

Spoon also makes sure the car appears very pleasantly, as well as recurring its true self. Under the spotlights, this model is amazingly designed. There isn't any body kits, moldings, splitters, diffusers, etc. that hinders its base form. Not even a grand spoiler! Although there is a teeny little light fixture placed on the roof. The car sports a sky blue & bright yellow bi-color. It contains Spoon themselves, Polyphony Digital's sponsor, and other sponsors near the front wheel arch. For me I love the yellow & blue. It really brightens the car aside from the aggressive colors that litters race cars today. The model is probably based off the AP1.

Its interior is pleasing. The windshield is of a boxy shape, and has a great view of the road. The rear view itself is huge! It surprised me when I looked back :crazy:

Also a note: I did change the rims, so the rims you'll see is not the original set!

It's specs is not terrible at all, but it is mainly low numbers. On the other hand this car was never meant to be tuned to the max. It has around 330 HP, 170 ft-lb of torque, and weighs a small 1050kg. It specs no displacement. The engine itself is most likely the same as the AP1's: A DOHC-VTEC 4-cylinder inline. And we all can tell how the power of VTEC will boast this car's ability :sly: The test course shall be Nordschleife!


6864847405_109908bd64.jpg
6864847525_0f55f56376_z.jpg
6864847137_dab4a000e0.jpg
6864846993_426006b57f_z.jpg
6864846811_9ab0c03a48.jpg
6864846481_50b84e890f.jpg
6864844957_aeccb3f941.jpg
6864845813_de969a50a6.jpg




I didn't really think it would be necessary to default the car's tires to RH. So instead I equipped SM tires for the testing.


The S2000 executes corners marvelously! It had a mixture of understeer and oversteer on a variety of turns, but each one can be done in a quick fashion. The odd thing was its redline. It extended all the way to 18000 RPM, while its redline is actually at 11000-12000 RPM.

One of its aspects in the car's style is its liftoff. For the power of VTEC, it was able to push itself to 90 mph a couple seconds after a sharp turn. What contributed also is its gearbox. the gears are close together, and links the speed before and after. However it had problems climbing hills. Another is its braking power. The distance covered to brake is minimal, either braking lightly or extreme.

Since the car is an FR (unlike the AP1, which has an FMR), it lacks in maximum front end grip. However it does not mean you can take turns head-on. But at times it will be necessary to slow down extensively to tackle a slow section. On the other hand, the engine bay will provide extra adhesion to the tires when braking. The car also distributes a bit of rotation to the rear, so it will kick a wee bit after a turn.

In weight transfer, it moves the most in sharp turns. It notably transfers a lot to the outside tires, leaving the inside a small amount of adhesion. This movement will disable its maximum possible momentum, because it does not distribute evenly. Luckily, this doesn't break too much on its overall handling.

For its suspension, it absorbs hefty amounts of shock. So if you ever jump over a ramp or something, it'll probably land safe-and-sound. This goes for rumble strips.

The car has little to no wheelspin, both from its torque value & its drivetrain.

On Nordschleife's longest straight, I was able to push the car to 153 mph, before bouncing off its rev. I also noticed its gears is a bit too short on some sectors, so some tranny tuning could be done to effectively reach its proper momentum.

Its engine and exhaust notes isn't too impressive. It is very muffled, and lacks in gruesome noise. Although it does rumble and growls like an enraged dog.

Final Scores
Appearance: Simply adorable! :P 10/10
Power: It isn't super duper quick, but it is enough to satisfy anyone 9/10
Worth: It is priced at 125k Credits, so it isn't bad. I'd say it is worth it 10/10
Ability: Executes its motions fancily. Although it does have under- and over-steer combos 9/10
Merry-Go-Round: It drives very peacefully, almost like the Carrazota. It is top in "Cars to take on a Sunday Drive" for me 10/10
Ease: It isn't too hoarse 10/10
Record Player: The most unimpressive feature 3/10

Total Score: 61/70

To Conclude: It is a quintessential vehicle. It was built for pure racing, but it still has that cruising S2000s contain. I'd imagine driving it on Sundays if I ever obtain this car in real life :D
 
Nice review. Now you need to test the S2000 LM Touring Car. I have one you can test. :D
 
Your Record Player ratings are quite over the place. If a Castrol Tom's Supra warrants an 8.5 then I'm not quite sure how a Spoon S2k Race Car manages a 3. Just my opinion though.

And plus, for the most part, you seem to be giving everything a max 10/10, implying that it's flawless essentially. And for all I know when I drove the S2k Race Car, it wasn't the most fun thing I'd ever driven.
 
:sly:

Great job once again Techy. 18,000 RPM !?!? People at car magazines call the Ferrari 458's 9,000 RPM redline in stratospheric. 18,000 RPM is just crazy.

~Turtle
turtle.gif

That is just what the GUI implied. The real redline is at 12000 max.


Your Record Player ratings are quite over the place. If a Castrol Tom's Supra warrants an 8.5 then I'm not quite sure how a Spoon S2k Race Car manages a 3. Just my opinion though.

And plus, for the most part, you seem to be giving everything a max 10/10, implying that it's flawless essentially. And for all I know when I drove the S2k Race Car, it wasn't the most fun thing I'd ever driven.

Maybe I have been rushing through the scoring. To be honest, I don't really want to judge cars by quantitative value. Perhaps I'll just pull them off and let the reader decide.
 
To be honest, I don't really want to judge cars by quantitative value.

Indeed. It can be moderately hard to decide on correct values, I know that much. Splitting it into various categories might well make it easier.

Oh, and anything non-racer coming up soon? :sly:
 
Indeed. It can be moderately hard to decide on correct values, I know that much. Splitting it into various categories might well make it easier.

Oh, and anything non-racer coming up soon? :sly:

I'll probably go back and edit out some scores. But what you see now is what I truly feel about the car. I also never liked placing a car down below a 5. It was tough for deciding on the S2K's Record Player.


And yes, I am. I'm currently deciding though.

Nice review. Now you need to test the S2000 LM Touring Car. I have one you can test. :D

Sure! And I already have one, but thank you though. Or is it from a tuning group?
 
Honda S2000 LM Race Car - Fiction LM

6878478109_6c9ebf23b0.jpg





You have probably seen this car from GT4:

Honda_S2000_LM_Race_Car_01_p02.sized.jpg


Now it has reincarnated in GT5, just like many of the standard cars that was ported into this massive game.

Created by what we know and love Polyphony Digital, this car is based on the S2000, before it ceased production in 2009. This model is completely race-modified, with a boisterous VTEC 2.0L 4-inline as its power-plant. The car supports a rollcage, and has a reinforced skeleton. It is meant as a serious racing machine, similar to the real-life S2000 Race Car I reviewed recently.

Aesthetically, the car appears promising. At the front presents a spot for quad yellow lights -- most likely for lighting assists in the pitch night driving -- and canopies. The headlights is also tinted yellow. You can also see molds done on the sides, like the classic protruding mold on the rear wheel arches. Then at the rear has more molds, and a large diffuser bay right below the car. Plus the distinct layout of the spoiler, almost like the layout of the Mazda 787B's, where the spoiler is aligned with the car itself. But what the car suffers is the texture quality. Some parts of the sponsors is pixelated, and cannot be distinguished easily. But that doesn't ruin its decals completely. There is also the well-known incorrect car numbers on the sides and bonnet: The sides exists a #30, but on the hood exists a #33. This was even present on GT4.

For this car, there is multiple colors available. However the one I will test will be a bit cliche :sly:

The windshield in the interior is a protuberant type, while it is cut off by the massive blindfolds glued on the top. The rear view is gigantic, however.

The LM's specs include 330 HP (w/ oil change), 180 ft-lb of torque, and 1050 kg. And come to think of it, it is almost the exact same numbers as of the S2000 Race Car :crazy: The test course is once again Nordschleife, in RH tires (I forgot to change the tires the 1st time).








6878478029_4a9997fc7b_z.jpg
6878477935_28c9f6cb64_z.jpg
6878477791_03cece5336.jpg
6878477655_40d505b1b9.jpg


6878477853_3182165ca7_z.jpg


6878477597_1f97f510c5_z.jpg







Performance-wise, there isn't much that this car gloats in. The car has fine poise. It also doesn't take too much effort to drive quickly in. Just throw in some hot-lapping knowledge and you got yourself a homing device.

Its impressive checkpoints is liftoff speed. Thanks to the notorious VTEC, it can jolt off almost any turn, without deteriorating its handling. The 1050 kg weight also contributes highly in its ability, similar to the S2000 RC (Race Car). But this model is able to manipulate discrepancies in transfer a bit more, since its skeleton is reinforced. This advantage led the car to increasing its speeds just a tad more, and smoothness.

Watching closely at its gearbox, it is relatively close to the S2000 RC's tranny. But the gear ratios grind a meaningful tune, and can reach its velocities effectively. At the longest straight, I pushed the car to around 165 mph -- 12 mph more than the S2000 RC's. Though the final gear didn't bounce off just yet, so you could squeeze just a little more out of it.

The front tires tend to loose quite a bit of grip in slow sections, but that is understandable for an FR.

The only bad thing about this particular car is that... it fells dull. It executes turns beautifully, but how it does it feels strangely monotonous.

Finally, the car sound. It's adequate. VTEC just kicked in dis ride, so it isn't too terribly hateful.


Final Scores
Released later.
 
Last edited:
I have found the S2000 LM to be uncompetitive with other race cars in the same PP level. It drives well but it can't keep up with GT300 machines equally tuned.

The engine revs to the moon but never feels strong.

In my opinion it would be a better car with a turbo making some torque.

I am a great fan of the S2000 in all it's form but this one sits in my garage undriven.
 
I have found the S2000 LM to be uncompetitive with other race cars in the same PP level. It drives well but it can't keep up with GT300 machines equally tuned.

The engine revs to the moon but never feels strong.

In my opinion it would be a better car with a turbo making some torque.

I am a great fan of the S2000 in all it's form but this one sits in my garage undriven.

I beg to differ. My 314BHP, 516PP S2000 LM will keep up with and beat cars with over 600PP. And it's also faster than the turbocharged RKM tune.
 
The S2000 LM is a fantastic little car. The power delivery is incredibly linear so you can just wind it up to the moon and worry little about wheel spin. It's also very good at playing the momentum game during cornering (IE fast in, fast out) which can be very rewarding on rhythmic circuits like the Nordschliefe or Suzuka. I wouldn't match it to a street circuit with lots of hairpins as it doesn't have very much torque to pull from low speed corners. In that situation it will get obliterated by GT300 cars which emphasize low end torque and mid range power.

The S2000LM is high on my list for 'wish it was premium' for the reasons above as well as the noise. I think it sounds rather good. There is definitely a proper 'snortiness' to it's vtec engine. Hondas never sound beautiful in a romantic sense; there is little melody. They always sound a bit industrial. There is an underlying form to that 'busy' sound, though, that is quite moving. I miss my old b16a Civic.

Of all the standard cars, the S2k LM and Peugeot 905B are probably my favorites, and for largely similar reasons.
 
No, I'm sorry, but engine sounds 'atrocious'? What sort of hearing do you have? :lol:

It's brilliant! Who could not like the sound of a VTEC engine revving to 12000 - in pretty much any view? I mean, there are better sounds in the game but there's not much wrong with this one, right? ...Right?
 
No, I'm sorry, but engine sounds 'atrocious'? What sort of hearing do you have? :lol:

It's brilliant! Who could not like the sound of a VTEC engine revving to 12000 - in pretty much any view? I mean, there are better sounds in the game but there's not much wrong with this one, right? ...Right?

Maybe it sounds a bit melodic, but at my ears it doesn't sound too well :P But expect that sentence to be rewritten.


My next car to review will be 100% a sports car, and a looker at that :sly:

The S2000 LM is a fantastic little car. The power delivery is incredibly linear so you can just wind it up to the moon and worry little about wheel spin. It's also very good at playing the momentum game during cornering (IE fast in, fast out) which can be very rewarding on rhythmic circuits like the Nordschliefe or Suzuka. I wouldn't match it to a street circuit with lots of hairpins as it doesn't have very much torque to pull from low speed corners. In that situation it will get obliterated by GT300 cars which emphasize low end torque and mid range power.

The S2000LM is high on my list for 'wish it was premium' for the reasons above as well as the noise. I think it sounds rather good. There is definitely a proper 'snortiness' to it's vtec engine. Hondas never sound beautiful in a romantic sense; there is little melody. They always sound a bit industrial. There is an underlying form to that 'busy' sound, though, that is quite moving. I miss my old b16a Civic.

Of all the standard cars, the S2k LM and Peugeot 905B are probably my favorites, and for largely similar reasons.

Your post gave me an idea to my reviews 👍
 
Alfa Romeo 8C Competizione '08 [P] - Sports Car
Competizione --> Competition

6889076315_25572fb540_z.jpg



Route X Speed Testing
0-60 mph: 4.058 seconds
0-100 mph: 8.844 seconds
0-1/4 mile: 12.338 seconds
0-1 mile: 30.285 seconds
Top Speed: 194.6 mph
Max. G Force: 0.85 G​


This began its life as a concept car in the 2003 Frankfurt Motor Show, and unleashed awe to the entire crowd. The car was a collaboration between Maserati & Alfa Romeo. It was then released as a production model in 2007, but was limited to only 500 copies. Only a year did the entire production was licked dry by private consumers.

The car was inspired by Alfa's lustrous past. The car's name lies two codes. Code "8C" tells about the story of 8 cylinder plants designed by Vittorio Jano, as a way to meet the needs of buyers and radiate competition. The first car that was fitted with an 8C is the 1923 Alfa Romeo P1, which was also Alfa's first GP vehicle. However the car was highly unsuccessful, and so it was replaced by the P2. The 1924 Alfa P2 then led the company to great heights when it won the inaugural Automobile World Championship in 1925. It was driven by the hands of Antonio Ascari, who also broke the speed record on Monza at 98 mph. Only 2 of the 6 cars exist to this day, both which are in a automobile museum. The P2 was so successful, the company finally incorporated a laurel wreath in their logo.

Alfa-Romeo-P2_3.jpg


Afterwards, it instantly boomed the way towards 8 cylinder engines. The plant was reliable, and roars like a tornado. One of the most famous cars to incorporate the engine was the Alfa Romeo 8C.

The Alfa 8C was designed by no other than Vittorio Jano, whom also created his first straight-8 layout. Although it branched into different versions, it all shared similar features (I would cover them, but you can Google them right?).

The 8 cylinder fantasia also convinced renown drivers to hone their skills in 8C automobiles, in the most prestigious circuits in the world.

One iconic GP vehicle was the 8C 2900. It glistened hugely in its victories in the Mille Miglia & 24hr Le Mans, and proved ground for a long period of time with its reliability and sheer power.

There was also the Alfa 158/159 Alfetta (Little Alfa), one of the most successful racing cars. It dominated the first two seasons of the F1 Championship when it was categorized as an F1 in 1947, and was purely legendary in its time.

Alfa Romeo then decided to withdraw from motorsports and view in the eyes of consumers. It led to several commercial models, like the Guilietta and the 1900. There was also the Tipo 33 which used 8 cylinder engines, and also had an extremely rare "Stradale" (road-going) version.

All of this history was relived on the 8C Competizione. Quite amazing, honestly. Now the other code: Competizione. This referred to the 6C 2500 Competizione driven by Fangio and Zanardi in the 1950 Mille Milgia race. That's pretty much it :P



What the 8C Competizione gets done right is its styling. It looks very formal, and jam-packs on what Alfas lived as both tradition and in motorsports. One of the things Alfa and Maserati tries to accomplish is decent aerodynamic efficiency. They attempt to make the air "wrap around the object", and direct the air to its departure quickly like rapid water. But they also must focus if the car is appealing to the driver. Fortunately, it turned out great!

The car's poise is very masculine, and expertly sculpted. The head and taillights glisten like diamonds, the vent conceals two homing missiles, the bonnet shaped like barchettas. Each feature is innovative, and is very original. It is a virtue that it has no generic moldings or aggressive body kits (exception of GT5's aero kits). Thank you, Wolgang Egger.

The interior proves no different. It is luxurious, and combines racing and comfort styles. The dash, seats, and console is all carbon fiber. There is even a metal plaque that states its genuineness as one of the 500 units produced.

The 8C's heart is the most important aspect. It pumps 4.7L inside the iconic 8 cylinder, 90-V engine, generating roughly 500 HP. It also includes 380 ft-lb of torque, weighs 1585 kg, and has a transaxle semi-auto 6 speed tranny. The skeleton is made of steel and carbon to optimize weight transfer, and comes with 5 driving presets: Manual-Normal; Manual-Sport; Auto-Normal; Auto-Sport; and Ice. Unfortunately they do not exist in GT5. Alfa Romeo also wanted the best natural sound from the engine and exhaust, so they tuned it countless times.

6889076445_f67d64655a_z.jpg


The Competizione handles fantastic! While it isn't a race-car type of handling, it corners very distinctly. However the car demands a patient driver. It will not respond properly if it was driven like a rally car, nor recover the way the driver wants it to recover. So it is commonplace for the car to fishtail.

6889076379_6a343db056_z.jpg


Alfa Romeo pointed out weight transfer quite clearly on this model. They desired the car to move like a gliding bird, not move like a worm. And their promise is well kept. There are still compromises, unfortunately. For one thing, it swings like a swing-set if you steer sharply. Control is also another key point. Since this car is an FR, torque will become a hassle. And it is.

6889076253_3c270f1eb1_z.jpg


Patience is once again an emphasis on this model. The car will tense up if the driver acts too much force. In addition, it contracts a lot of understeer, and it is tough to snap the hypnosis. The car isn't too forgiving, either. If you ever miss the slightest inputs, the car would struggle to retain its shape. It will be evidenced that the front will burn through or a likely fishtail to occur.

6889076153_be8fee5cd5_z.jpg


Braking into chicanes, slow sectors, etc. is another thing to carefully note. The car takes some time to rocket down to necessary speeds, but the distance covered isn't all too bad. Diving into Rettifilo for instance marks a bit of distance to actually reduce down to negotiable degrees.

6889076057_b6c46b5cbe_z.jpg


The 6-speed gearbox is finely prepared, although it isn't explosive. As soon as you shift up or down, it falls to a point where it will just deteriorate its potential. In the case of cruising or calm driving though, it is nicely produced.

6889076001_5bcbbe6560_z.jpg


The funny thing about this vehicle is how all of its handling characteristics come together. It amuses the driver, whether it spins out or smooths through anything it undergoes. Plus, it gets the job done. Look at its acceleration. It isn't the speed of light, like most modern cars tries to implicate. Instead, it gradually builds its speeds. Sometimes it does feel like it can go a lot faster, but as a personal opinion, it would lose its purpose all-together. Liftoffs isn't too impressive, but surely it kicks.

6889075909_77e449980b_z.jpg


As mentioned before, Alfa wanted to tune the engine & exhaust system to boast its natural sounds as roaring as possible. And certainly they did accomplished that goal. From a first-time drive, you can already tell it is a V8. And as it revs, it becomes more and more aggressive. It pretty much growls to expectations, and doesn't feel one bit choppy.

6889075785_67ef24a7a1_z.jpg


Nevertheless, this is purely a romantic and formal vehicle. Not anyone can handle this beauty, but you do not have to be a pro driver to handle this masterpiece, nor even witness its love and compassion. It is a folded present of Alfa Romeo's motorsport success, and is true to you and theirs.


"This... is 14 feet of art..."
- Jeremy Clarkson



History courtesy of Google
 
Last edited:
Beauitfully written and said Techy. I love the review.

You gave it a basic history report and worked all the way to the review. Well done. :)👍
 
Beauitfully written and said Techy. I love the review.

You gave it a basic history report and worked all the way to the review. Well done. :)👍

Arigatou. I'll attempt to do the same on other real-life automobiles I review as well 👍
 
Note: I have Route X now so I'll be testing out the other vehicles for their acceleration and speeds.
 
Back