THE MONZTER MAZDA 277.60 Mph

  • Thread starter Thread starter JDM-NiSMO-R34
  • 9 comments
  • 918 views
Messages
1
OMG...The Beast has finaly came through the track...this MAZDA R-X7 SPirit R type A (FD) '02, tested with everything its got...just equip everything and you'll see.... the most out of it...:crazy:

GEAR RATIOS...

1. 3.076
2. 2.099
3. 1.550
4. 1.196
5. 0.949
6. 0.808

final. 2.500
TEST IT ON THE TEST COURSE WITH NOS!!!
 
I'm asking a few of our 300mph club members to give this a test. I suspect, your record may not be all that you think it may.

Good luck
 
I just gave it a shot in the same car with my own ratios, all the horse power mods, 100 nitrous and made 449.56km/h which converted equals 279.36mph

Easy to do, can supply picture if needed.
 
I got 285.36mph first time out on the test track with it after tuning the car blindly (actually, it was the second run on the track, as I messed up a gear change first time round and quit out, hehe). I do have a little more experience than most when it comes to high speed tuning for Gran Turismo though... 👍
 
I got 285.36mph first time out on the test track with it after tuning the car blindly (actually, it was the second run on the track, as I messed up a gear change first time round and quit out, hehe). I do have a little more experience than most when it comes to high speed tuning for Gran Turismo though... 👍

Nice job getting the Rx-7 to go that fast... This really sounds like the "Real Driving Simulator" now... :mad:🤬:banghead:
 
There's a lot more to it than that, guys...

DE

Well I just quickly tuned the car to see if I could make 277mph as others were doubting it. I wasn't going for records.
 
That is impossible. How did you go that fast?

just equip everything and you'll see.... the most out of it...:crazy:

GEAR RATIOS...

1. 3.076
2. 2.099
3. 1.550
4. 1.196
5. 0.949
6. 0.808

final. 2.500
TEST IT ON THE TEST COURSE WITH NOS!!!

No Mazda can go that fast. What kind of Mazda? 787B? :confused:

MAZDA R-X7 SPirit R type A (FD) '02

So, really, your post had absolutely no point, having been entirely addressed in the original post...
 
Back