The (un)offical guide to GTP Q&A!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
202
United States
Wisconsin
Messages
JJSCHMITTY
In order to properly answer a question, you must first classify it.

Catagories

1. Rational

These questions are quite frankly, questions. Answer them completly and quickly.

2. Nonsencical

These are questions that normally go in the following pattern.

Question: How do I put the Suzuki Escudo wing on my Sambabus?

Proper Reply: How do I buy a flaming hippopotamous?

3. Grammerically Ignorant

These questions are generally classified as this type if they are illegible. Example:

Question:wat iz ur psn snd me frnd rqust i gotz x1

Proper Reply: Hey, (insert other GTPers' name here), know what language this guy is speaking? I can't understand him.

4. Repeat Questionare

These questions are for people who don't know what the words "search button" mean. Answer the questions with long, overly complex and detailed answers that do absolutly nowhere near the desired thing.

Example:

Question: How do I break in a car?

Proper Reply: As you know, it's very hard to break in a car. First you must do the 4 hours of Nurbugring in it, then you have to paint the car pink, then you have to make part of it fall off, and then you have to do the 24 hours of Le Mans with it, and win, without stopping.



I hope this thread helped you in your quest of answering questions.
 
Uh... What? And it's Grammatically.
 
Don't we have this thread already?

Many don't read that one either!:lol:
 
And what is the point of this thread? Where is the classification for pointless threads like this one?
 
Pretty pointless im sure there is a stcky for the q&a section.
 
And what is the point of this thread? Where is the classification for pointless threads like this one?

It goes under the flaming hippopotamus subsection of the Nonsensical main section.
 
It goes under the flaming hippopotamus subsection of the Nonsensical main section.

B-but I wanted to put a Suzuki Escudo wing on my Samba Bus! ;-;
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back