Toyota Auris - the new Corolla

  • Thread starter Thread starter nitro_2005
  • 57 comments
  • 2,785 views
Messages
1,914
http://www.autoexpress.co.uk/news/motoringpreviews/203699/toyota_auris.html

Quote from Auto Express

There’s never been any question that the Toyota Corolla is anything but a huge global success. The world’s best-selling model has set standards for profitability and popularity that are the envy of every other manufacturer on the planet.

Practical, reliable and affordable, it helped to define the family market – so why is Toyota about to change everything for the new Auris? On the face of it, ditching the famous Corolla name is marketing madness. But fortune favours the brave, and the firm claims its new family car is so radically different, only a fresh badge would do.

Designed in Europe, there have been some pretty daring words bandied about prior to the launch of the newcomer. Sporty is perhaps the most obvious. But is the Auris really good enough to take on rivals such as the VW Golf and Vauxhall Astra? And can the newcomer match the impressive Honda Civic, which was not only designed and engineered in Europe, but is built in Britain, too? Auto Express was first behind the wheel of the Toyota to find out
.
Early impressions are mixed. The Auris is only 50mm taller and 65mm wider than the current Corolla, and as such looks quite compact when compared to the Ford Focus. However, the fresh styling certainly has character, while a sportier suspension system is also promised, as is a new range of powerplants which will ultimately be crowned with a near-250bhp turbocharged T Sport version*.

For the time being, though, our drive is limited to five engines, including 1.4 and 1.6-litre petrol units, plus a 2.0 and two 2.2 diesels. Jump behind the wheel, and the first thing you notice is how roomy the car is inside. It’s not only the extra head and legroom which stand out. The huge expanse of black plastic between the dashboard and windscreen makes the hatch feel bigger than it actually is, an effect created by the low-slanting A-pillar.

In fact, the designers extended the A-pillar so far forward that they have had to include an extra quarterlight window for better visibility. From the outside, the additional glass blends in well with the car’s profile. But from the front seat, it looks rather awkward.

Dominating the cabin is a silver-coloured ‘flying buttress’ centre console, which appears to be floating on the dashboard. It protrudes into the interior, and puts the gearstick, handbrake and switches all within easy reach. Unfortunately, we did notice some glare off the console’s shiny plastic surfaces. On top-spec models, dual-zone air-conditioning, a panoramic roof and paddleshifters will enhance the driving experience. Across the range, the seats are firm and supportive, and even the door handles have been specially coordinated to complement the console design.

The all-new chassis and suspension set-up makes the Auris a promising driver’s car. And just to keep owners on their toes, Toyota has fitted an ‘Eco’ light inside the speedo, which mea-sures your throttle input and glows green to reward efficient driving.

In contrast to the Corolla, the Auris’ chassis is a revelation. As well as better body control, its wider track and re-vamped suspension mean it devours corners effortlessly. Overall, the car feels very grown up, and there’s greater re-finement. On demanding roads, the Auris instantly proves more composed than its predecessor. And on the test track, it is easier to pick a quick line through corners, thanks to the neutral chassis and sharp turn-in. The steering itself is well weighted and responsive, and the rack is quicker than the old Corolla’s.

Crucially, the car’s braking is also much improved. That’s because the Toy-ota gets rear discs in addition to the vented front units, which deliver stron-ger, better balanced stopping power.
Ultimately, the Auris offers a whole lot more than the car which it replaces. It’s a Corolla that has ditched the med-iocrity, toned up its muscles, become much more athletic and taken a course in style and aesthetics. It will land in UK showrooms by next February. Rivals, you have been warned.

* I have inside info from my dad, who works at Toyota, about the Auris T-Sport. He told me these 3 facts:

Power - 285hp!
Drivetrain - 4WD!
0-60mph - UNDER 6 SECONDS!
 
You have relations with people in high places.
correction: my dad has relations with people in high places. He works as a sales manager for Toyota, and that's what he was told about the Auris T-Sport. It's designed to compete with the new Civic Type-R, and looking at the stats, it's gonna trounce it! Don't get me wrong, the new Type-R is great, but this new Auris T-Sport is gonna be mind-blowing!

Also, I've got another bit of sneaky news: Lexus will be putting the LF-A concept car into production as.....THE NEW SUPRA! It's coming in 2008, apparently, along with 12 new cars from Toyota, all of which I have no idea about, except one. All I know about that is it will be a replacement for both the Celica and MR2, so we both imagine it will be something like a mid-engined sports coupe.

Also, I can confirm that the Auris will be the only new car from Toyota in 2007 to date. It will be launched at the ICC in Birmingham in January, and then my dad is going to a media day at the Ascari Race Resort to DRIVE THE WHOLE RANGE! AND HE'S GIVING PASSENGER RIDES!
 
if its boring and bland like the last one I doubt the big power will sway people TBH. It needs to be the complete package. And the toyota badge has now nearly lost all the respect that the celica and supra had gained for it.
 
* I have inside info from my dad, who works at Toyota, about the Auris T-Sport. He told me these 3 facts:

Power - 285hp!
Drivetrain - 4WD!
0-60mph - UNDER 6 SECONDS!

Instead of Auris, Can we in the U.S. get that under the name Sprinter Trueno? or just Trueno?

:)
 
Instead of Auris, Can we in the U.S. get that under the name Sprinter Trueno? or just Trueno?

:)

No thanks; i'd rather a revival be a zippy dirt-cheap FR drivetrain.

Auris is pretty cool sounding, though.
 
Yeah, I think it'd be a good idea to bring a Trueno name here. But it should be a small, light Miata/Solstice/Sky competitor.

EDIT: Omnis agrees somewhat.:D
 
Woot! Performance Toyota's that are in the econobox area. I just hope the US gets the fast model. AWD WRX competitor is what I smell, and Toyota needs it.

All around disc brakes they are saying on the new model... thats something refreshing for compact cars as well. No more ugly rear drums.

What engine are they using for that turbocharged setup? Somewhat curious.

Guys, you do realize the Trueno/Levin name was used for 3 generations AFTER the AE86, on the AE92, AE101, and AE111? All of which were FWD, 4A powered cars. So I would be all for having the Levin name plate on this. Seems more Levin than Trueno... Trueno's always had sharper looks I felt.
 
Guys, you do realize the Trueno/Levin name was used for 3 generations AFTER the AE86, on the AE92, AE101, and AE111? All of which were FWD, 4A powered cars. So I would be all for having the Levin name plate on this. Seems more Levin than Trueno... Trueno's always had sharper looks I felt.

Of course. They aren't famous, though. Many people like old school impalas, yet, the current one is nothing to rave about, for example.
 
* I have inside info from my dad, who works at Toyota, about the Auris T-Sport. He told me these 3 facts:

Power - 285hp!
Drivetrain - 4WD!
0-60mph - UNDER 6 SECONDS!

Wow, a Toyota rival to the Evo and WRX STi. Bring it to the U.S. with a cool name like "Corolla GT-Four" or "Corolla All-Trac Turbo," price it comfortably under $30k and Toyota will need to use cargo planes instead of ships to keep up with demand!
 
Of course. They aren't famous, though. Many people like old school impalas, yet, the current one is nothing to rave about, for example.

Quite true, though I love the look of the AE111 and plan to import one when I get the funds.

Its just I dislike people thinking one model is what the car is. Same thing happens with the MR2 Turbo when compared to the MR-S, and people around here think Skyline instantly means GT-R... its quite annoying.

Auris XRS-T maybe. Or Levin XRS/Trueno XRS? Maybe GT-Four name as well, but those were typically from WRC models, so would be missing that link.

Still, if this car gets state side, it will be on my list of cars to get ;)
 
Woot! Performance Toyota's that are in the econobox area. I just hope the US gets the fast model. AWD WRX competitor is what I smell, and Toyota needs it.

All around disc brakes they are saying on the new model... thats something refreshing for compact cars as well. No more ugly rear drums.

What engine are they using for that turbocharged setup? Somewhat curious.

Guys, you do realize the Trueno/Levin name was used for 3 generations AFTER the AE86, on the AE92, AE101, and AE111? All of which were FWD, 4A powered cars. So I would be all for having the Levin name plate on this. Seems more Levin than Trueno... Trueno's always had sharper looks I felt.

alot of compacts in europe have had all round disc brakes for ages. I wouldnt buy a car that didnt have it TBH.
 
Thats my sentiments as well. But my Corolla does have rear drums, though its just my daily and does not see much intense braking.

Of course, part of the problem with people here is they don't know the difference. Brakes are brakes to them, from what I can tell.

Most of our sub compacts don't even have an option for rear discs, such as the Yaris and such. Well, from all the looking around I did I couldn't find the option.
 
Toyota? Sport? Fast?

...I'd hope they aren't joking, as I'm pretty much on my last thread with the company. Confidence has been slowly lost, and the competition has caught up rather quickly. Lets just hope Toyota is smart enough to keep the computers OUT this time...
 
Toyota? Sport? Fast?

...I'd hope they aren't joking, as I'm pretty much on my last thread with the company. Confidence has been slowly lost, and the competition has caught up rather quickly. Lets just hope Toyota is smart enough to keep the computers OUT this time...

Agreed, those specs are looking very nice but I hope they aren't bluffing, they really need to spice up their line-up...And I don't like the idea of the name change to be honest.

Although the Corolla may be a boring car, it's name is well known, especially for the '89-'92 model which a normal driver couldn't possibly destroy.

And about the 285 bhp thing, I think your dad is bluffing, or whatever it is. The T-sport would be most likely be the 175 2.2 D4-D model, just like the previous Corolla. Although, if it was true, then tumbs up for Toyota, took them since '99-'01 to make something fast again...

I don't like the looks either. The two little grills (?) under the headlights are just taken from the recent Opel models and the headlights just don't fit with them...
 
worth.gif



*edit*
Just saw the link. Very impressive review and stats, looks ugly as hell though.
 
Ultrashot
And about the 285 bhp thing, I think your dad is bluffing, or whatever it is. The T-sport would be most likely be the 175 2.2 D4-D model, just like the previous Corolla. Although, if it was true, then tumbs up for Toyota, took them since '99-'01 to make something fast again...

Umm, for your information, the T-sport model used a 190 HP 1.8L petrol engine known as the 2ZZ-GE. This is the same engine in the Lotus Elise 111R, Celica GT-S/T-sport, Matrix and Corolla XRS in the US, and a supercharged variant used in the supercharged Elise and Corolla Compressor.

Not some diesel... unless you guys got completely screwed on everything.
 
Lets just hope Toyota is smart enough to keep the computers OUT this time...

They're not. They thoroughly do not understand what makes a car fun to drive. Every Toyota since 1998 is proof of that. The MR2 is a bit of an exception (a little bit), but considering that it's been cancelled....

I'm confident that the power estimate is off by 100HP, although I don't doubt the all-wheel-drive. And is this how Toyota's going to design & name all their cars? Everything begins with the Yaris?

Yaris...Auris...what's next? A mid-size sedan named Ferris?
 
...Thats what Toyota does best; Ugly, bland cars for young girls and people over 50.
 
I'd say, bring back the Yaris RS Turbo with AWD and a big turbo in it :lol:






:grumpy:


Oh and thanks for the correction Azuremen 👍
 
Yeah, that car is pretty damn hideous. It looks like all the modern designers dropped out of fashion school or something; it's like they've never been into cars their entire lives.
 
i agree personally, the Auris isn't the best looking car in the world. To me it just looks like a cross between the current corrola and the new yaris. Also, here's something for you: the designers of the Auris designed the interior FIRST and then designed the body around it. I think they were trying to get as much space inside as an Avensis estate.

Yeh, it's stupid, isn't it....Toyota designers = :dunce: :dunce: :dunce:
 
...Thats what Toyota does best; Ugly, bland cars for young girls and people over 50.

I actually don't mind the styling. But I am a weird person so yeah.

I do have to agree that Toyota needs to do something about their image. I love all their pre 99 cars, and only really car about the MR-S and Celica GT-S following that. More crazy crap like back in the early 90s and late 80s, with turbos galore, AWD, and MR layouts. Please Toyota, please?

But if this is true about turboed AWD power, then I think this car will pick up a following regardless of what it looked like. And I still think it looks alot better than current hatchback competition, like the Calibur, Euro Civic Hatch thing, and the offerings from Kia/Hyundai. Compared to a car thats easy to draw an analogy to, the MPS3, I think it doesn't look at good, but I also have yet to see this Auris thing is person.

So only then do I decide. Cause I have seen cars that look good in pictures, but in person its just "bleh."
 
toyotas current hot hatch is already over priced even though it doesnt even look the part, and doesnt drive it either. I bet this new one will cost way too much for a toyota hatch
 
...The current Corolla is anything but spectacular by comparison to many of today's small cars here in the US, so IMO, almost anything is an improvement. But Toyota will have to work hard to convince many people that their cars hold a better "value" in performance against the Germans, "feel" in comparison to Honda, and it may even have "cool" issues against the Cobalt or G5.
 
Well, the Corolla image is tarnished in the US. Severely, with the last real performance variant being back in the early 90's, in the US at least. The AE92 Coupe GT-S.

Then we got bland 4 doors, except for the XRS, but its 165 HP or so was below par for its class and really didn't seem impressive. Not quite as bad as the previous Civic Si (EP-3) and its lack of anything remarkable, but still bad.

So the Corolla name is now connected with old people and such. Of course, if Toyota had released the AE101 and AE111 performance coupes in the US, its image might be a bit different - but its much too late for that now. And the Corolla S model almost made things worse, with its attempt at looking sporty without any real upgrade - drum brakes in the back still and the same basic engine.

This is why I can see the name change, because if they want to remake the Corolla into something sporty, they need a new name to get around the current stigma. My thoughts regarding that now that I have put a bit more thought into.

In order for this new performance model to do well, if it even exists, it must have a realistic price. Or more likely, undercut some of the competition. At 250 HP, it has more power than the WRX, but it will need to establish itself, so it should be priced right around the same as a WRX. Of course, it should then carry along a similarly sporty sporty feel with the buckets, more aggressive suspension, and so on. Toyota can do this, as they use to do it before. The main competition I see coming up, if its in this turboed AWD guise, is the WRX, MPS3, the SRT-4, the Cobalt SS, and some others I can't think of no doubt. The Civic Si does not have the power to compete well with these models on paper, and that will affect people looking to buy. Of course, the Si is supported more intensely by its cult following I feel these days more than anything. Similar sentiments regarding the GTi, though its German back ground gives it more prestige, it also takes away some elements, such as long term reliability, which works against them.
 
Back