Toyota Solves the World's Fuel Crisis

  • Thread starter Thread starter Joey D
  • 35 comments
  • 1,836 views
You know these engine on off vehicles are a load of rubbish...

You use far more petrol to start your engine than you would leaving it idle for a couple of mins and if its going to do this everytime you slow down for traffic or stop at a light its going to ruin your MPG consumption, its just a PR ploy.

Robin

So where can I get these numbers?
 
Have you ever tried carrying even half a load of groceries three kilometers? Even one kilometer?
Just today I carried home 35 dollars of groceries, from a store about a km away. Im not saying people should be lugging home everything on their backs, but driving a km to pick something up just seems like w waste of fuel.

And yes, i do carry heavy things over distances as my university is about a 35-40 minute walk away and i often carry heavy text books over that. Sometimes twice a day.
 
I mean do we honestly need a major corporation to come out and say "If you drive less you'll burn less fuel"?

It is quite funny a car company (doing well) is saying this. I think it'd be even funnier if a domestic car company said it. On the serious side I mean... that is kinda of an obvious statement. :dunce:
 
Odd that Toyota would say to "drive less" when they're selling fewer cars these days. But, I digress...

Whats been my solution for a while?

Make gas more expensive and people will drive less. For the most part, its been working. As we hover around $4.00 people are making better choices about where they're going, what they're driving, and which way they're going to get there. Can't argue with their logic.
 
Public transportation works when there are lots of routes, good timing, and it runs efficiently. The paradox is that large cities have more stops, more streets, and unless there are more "express" routes, a bus or train can take much longer than going by car. People tend to wait until the last moment, and time is one thing everyone values above all else. Cars help us get to short distances faster, period.

A town like Gainesville (population 100,000) ran their bus system very efficiently and conveniently. I used it to get to school, since I'd spend 10 minutes getting to school/work and 20 minutes wasting gas looking for a parking space, and still walk half a mile to my class or workplace. Meanwhile, I could take the bus for free 99% of the time, and walk a little less in comparison, and save headache of parking. No, the seats aren't comfortable; yes, at 5pm, the bus could be packed with 50 people...And on rare occasions, it ran late or was "full". But you couldn't beat the price and lack of wear-and-tear.

Public transportation works only if planned to a tee; some places are naturally suited to public transportation, but sometimes suburban planning makes travel by foot or bike to shopping centers difficult or much more time-consuming.

Yes, walking and biking will cost you less money, but it will cost time. But gas has to get very expensive (add 1.50/gallon, in my case) for a new car purchase (plus savings in tag, insurance, maintenance) to outweigh the cost of fuel and a fuel economy increase. And that's by switching to a car that gets twice the fuel economy of my car.
 
Public transportation works when there are lots of routes, good timing, and it runs efficiently. The paradox is that large cities have more stops, more streets, and unless there are more "express" routes, a bus or train can take much longer than going by car. People tend to wait until the last moment, and time is one thing everyone values above all else. Cars help us get to short distances faster, period.

A town like Gainesville (population 100,000) ran their bus system very efficiently and conveniently. I used it to get to school, since I'd spend 10 minutes getting to school/work and 20 minutes wasting gas looking for a parking space, and still walk half a mile to my class or workplace. Meanwhile, I could take the bus for free 99% of the time, and walk a little less in comparison, and save headache of parking. No, the seats aren't comfortable; yes, at 5pm, the bus could be packed with 50 people...And on rare occasions, it ran late or was "full". But you couldn't beat the price and lack of wear-and-tear.

Public transportation works only if planned to a tee; some places are naturally suited to public transportation, but sometimes suburban planning makes travel by foot or bike to shopping centers difficult or much more time-consuming.

Yes, walking and biking will cost you less money, but it will cost time. But gas has to get very expensive (add 1.50/gallon, in my case) for a new car purchase (plus savings in tag, insurance, maintenance) to outweigh the cost of fuel and a fuel economy increase. And that's by switching to a car that gets twice the fuel economy of my car.
I rarely go to work with my car. The main reason is I can't afford the gas, but I actually prefer to take the bus because I get more angry with the traffic jam when I'm driving than when I'm the passenger.
 

Latest Posts

Back