Toyota Supra RZ TRACK Tune

Discussion in 'GT6 Tuning' started by HTR Tuning, Jan 1, 2014.

  1. HTR Tuning

    HTR Tuning

    Messages:
    219
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    HTR Tuning Banner.png
    This is the a Track tune for the legendary Supra.

    Stats:
    Performance Points: 614 PP
    Max. Power: 937 BHP
    Weight: 1,208 kg
    Front/Rear weight distribution: 58:42
    Displacement: 2,997cc
    Max. Torque: 113kgfm
    Drivetrain:FR/T
    Length:4,520mm
    Width:1,810mm
    Height:1,275mm
    Power-to-weight ratio: 1.28kg/BHP

    You will need to purchase all top items,plus oil change,wing is not recommended but can be applied via GT AUTO (This tune was done with the standard wing).

    Settings: (F/R)

    Suspension:

    Ride Height: 80mm/80mm
    Spring rate: 9.67/10.19
    Dampers (compression): 4/5
    Dampers (extension): 5/6
    Anti-roll bars: 5/4
    Camber Angle (-): 0.7/0.5
    Toe angle: -0.07/0.07

    Brakes: 5/5*

    Transmission: 217mph **

    Drivetrain:
    Initial Torque: NA/25
    Acceleration Sensitivity: NA/30
    Braking Sensitivity: NA/25

    Tuners comment: Car is good at handling and acceleration, be careful when turning,*The barkes can be adjusted to your choice,**the transmission varies for different tracks so adjust that for different tracks. Tested at Brands Hatch, time:1:29.18. If you have any queries please leave them below, Hope you enjoy :)
    __97_supra_rz___gt5_by_sippelonmynipple-d382d60.jpg
     
    Last edited: Jan 31, 2014
    2JZ Life and viciousslayer like this.
  2. Obi Wan

    Obi Wan

    Messages:
    31
    Can't wait to try this out when I get a chance! My attempted supra set up is awful.
     
    Willie Flores likes this.
  3. Streeto

    Streeto

    Messages:
    3,129
    Location:
    Japan
    Surely that much camber on the rear ruins your traction, not to mention the spring rates being oversteer biased.

    Although I haven't driven it myself, that's what I would expect from those figures.

    Even on racing soft that seems like it would be a handful, especially with that crazy power.

    I haven't tried it though so...

    Edit: Just noticed you left the weight distribution on 58/42, so I guess the spring rates make sense, but everything else I said still stands...
     
    BadgerVadge likes this.
  4. randyrockstiff

    randyrockstiff

    Messages:
    366
    Location:
    Scotland
    just tried this with racing softs at the burg, back end just slides away bro. even when feathering the throttle
     
  5. ImToLegitToQuit

    ImToLegitToQuit

    Messages:
    672
    Location:
    United States
    lol that's because it's over 900 HP. I would recommend labeling this as a maxed out tune rather than a track tune. at over 600pp it would be going up against purpose built cars that it just could not keep up with. there is part of the community out there that look for tunes that have all parts added. this fits more inline with that.
     
    BadgerVadge likes this.
  6. 332i

    332i (Banned)

    Messages:
    855
    Location:
    Morocco
    Not to mention that it is from eight or nine updates ago.
     
    XS likes this.
  7. YellowDiamond

    YellowDiamond

    Messages:
    1
    Would have been nice to know the Mid-Range turbo is better for the RZ, Thanks