- 3,130
- HaylRayzor
Am I the only one that prefers evenly divisible track lengths?
I have lots of tracks that are odd length, but if I make a track and it's close to an evenly divisible number (say 3.02 miles) I will try to adjust it to exactly 3 miles. Or if it's 3.24 miles I will try to get it to 3.25 miles.
My thinking is that if you're doing a race in miles an even numbered track length gives a precise answer. A 300 mile race at a 3 mile track is a perfect 100 laps.
I have a 5-mile endurance track that will make a perfect number of laps for any length race. 100 miles, 150 miles, 500 miles...
I'd love to make a 1 2/3 mile oval track. The math works out really beautifully for a 500-mile race at 300 laps.
I have lots of tracks that are odd length, but if I make a track and it's close to an evenly divisible number (say 3.02 miles) I will try to adjust it to exactly 3 miles. Or if it's 3.24 miles I will try to get it to 3.25 miles.
My thinking is that if you're doing a race in miles an even numbered track length gives a precise answer. A 300 mile race at a 3 mile track is a perfect 100 laps.
I have a 5-mile endurance track that will make a perfect number of laps for any length race. 100 miles, 150 miles, 500 miles...
I'd love to make a 1 2/3 mile oval track. The math works out really beautifully for a 500-mile race at 300 laps.