seadog777
Premium
- 3,014

- Iskandar
- seadog777
I thought Racing Hard would last longer than Racing soft.... is that reasonable?
Well I nearly didn't win the A spec Indy 500 because of that assumption!
I managed 29 laps before the car became un-driveable... but with a 24 second lead in the Bentley, I wasn't too fussed. However, I'd forgotten how long it takes to put petrol in....
By the time I'd got back on the track I was down to 12th again... and I'd put another set of hards on.
The other cars didn't seem to be stopping until at least lap 40 which was a real surprise.
So next pit stop, at about lap 58 when again the car was all over the place, I put softs on. What a difference. 1 second a lap quicker, no noticeable difference in speed of wear, but the important thing... I could keep them going for at least 35 laps!
So, what is the point of Racing Hards??
Well I nearly didn't win the A spec Indy 500 because of that assumption!
I managed 29 laps before the car became un-driveable... but with a 24 second lead in the Bentley, I wasn't too fussed. However, I'd forgotten how long it takes to put petrol in....
By the time I'd got back on the track I was down to 12th again... and I'd put another set of hards on.
The other cars didn't seem to be stopping until at least lap 40 which was a real surprise.
So next pit stop, at about lap 58 when again the car was all over the place, I put softs on. What a difference. 1 second a lap quicker, no noticeable difference in speed of wear, but the important thing... I could keep them going for at least 35 laps!
So, what is the point of Racing Hards??