It would be unfair if, let's say, if only Irons stated his vote.
It's not that Irons is the only one stating his vote. It's just that his vote ended up being the most important, because when he "voted" (again) I'm sure the poll wasn't at 8/8 yet, and even if that was the case, Tankuroded was free to vote yours or the Elise also.
But then again, this adds questions. If Irons and Tankuroded had an opportunity to second vote, shouldn't the other voters had a chance to vote again in a tie break?
Not exactly, since they are not voting again, but rather making their vote count, since their first one was worth nothing. The pictures they voted for were illegal, and in the remote case one of those pictures had gotten the most votes, it wouldn't be the winner.
Also, if let's say mine got 9 votes and the Elise 8 votes, but Irons and Tankuroded said they wanted to vote for the Elise, who should win in this case?
If they said it before the 9/8 results? The Elise. Afterwards? The Elise, too. BUT, if they were restricted to vote for one of the two, then the correct thing to do would be to go into a tie breaker poll, because their votes are made decisive, and everyone's votes should be equal.
EDIT: In my opinion.
Seems like SVX will make a tie breaker. Perfectly good, I suppose. If someone reads this, however, is worth noting that if the results are different than the one proposed here (Elise winning), the original "winner" may be pissed, but in reality, it's a fair matter in that the winner will continue to be chosed by the people. However, when people who voted for one car vote for the other one, things may get nasty.