- 2,465

- Retired to a padded cell
- GTP_Padded_Cell
Just incase you haven't seen it yet, the spring rate(s) values have been changed on most, if not all road cars.
Some cars have had the fr and rr rates even out, whereas before it was 0.1 to 0.2 different (usually higher on the lighter end of the car) and the range of the spring has been increased to.
Examples:
Alfa Mito '09
Was fr 1.4-3.3 & rr 1.6 - 3.5 - 'range' of 1.9
Now fr 1.5-3.5 & rr 1.5 - 3.5 - 'range' of 2.0
8c Competizione '08
Was fr 1.6 - 3.5 & rr 1.8 - 3.7 - 'range' of 1.9
Now fr 1.75 - 3.75 & rr 1.75 - 5.75 'range' of 2.0
BMW M3 '89
Was fr 1.2 - 3.1 & rr 1.35 - 3.25 - 'range' of 1.9
Now fr 1.25 - 3.25 & rr 1.25 & 3.25 - 'range' of 2.0
Ford Mustang GT '15
Was fr 1.3 - 3.2 & rr 1.45 - 3.35 - 'range' of 1.9
Now fr 1.5 - 3.5 & rr 1.5 - 3.50 - 'range' of 2.0
I checked about 25/30 cars on my list, it was the same for everyone. Some cars had the 'tuned' spring rates completely changed, others were about 'right'.
Aero changes to racecars (there's been changes to roadcars too)
Some cars have had the fr and rr rates even out, whereas before it was 0.1 to 0.2 different (usually higher on the lighter end of the car) and the range of the spring has been increased to.
Examples:
Alfa Mito '09
Was fr 1.4-3.3 & rr 1.6 - 3.5 - 'range' of 1.9
Now fr 1.5-3.5 & rr 1.5 - 3.5 - 'range' of 2.0
8c Competizione '08
Was fr 1.6 - 3.5 & rr 1.8 - 3.7 - 'range' of 1.9
Now fr 1.75 - 3.75 & rr 1.75 - 5.75 'range' of 2.0
BMW M3 '89
Was fr 1.2 - 3.1 & rr 1.35 - 3.25 - 'range' of 1.9
Now fr 1.25 - 3.25 & rr 1.25 & 3.25 - 'range' of 2.0
Ford Mustang GT '15
Was fr 1.3 - 3.2 & rr 1.45 - 3.35 - 'range' of 1.9
Now fr 1.5 - 3.5 & rr 1.5 - 3.50 - 'range' of 2.0
I checked about 25/30 cars on my list, it was the same for everyone. Some cars had the 'tuned' spring rates completely changed, others were about 'right'.
Aero changes to racecars (there's been changes to roadcars too)