Walamas

  • Thread starter Thread starter supra229
  • 99 comments
  • 3,129 views
They run superfast, and come in different colours...That's about it. Actually, mayorbill11 started it off.
 
Uh - is it just me, or do those things appear to run backwards.

They're hilarious, by the way - if a little creepy....
 
Originally posted by vat_man
Uh - is it just me, or do those things appear to run backwards.

They're hilarious, by the way - if a little creepy....

Yeah they do and they apparently also run forwards.
 
I like the pink one. It reminds me of those marshmallow Peeps you can get at Easter. Here's one now having a cigarette.

peep990329.jpg
 
There's people using these stupid things as avatars all over the place. There's people at a Corvette forum, that I visit, that have been using them for a few weeks now.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
Like Josh, Josh's avatar sucks.


This coming from the person who has an ugly, yet cool named, tree as his avatar.
 
Originally posted by Josh
This coming from the person who has an ugly, yet cool named, tree as his avatar.

As opposed to Britney Spears covering the sides of her face with black gloves? I mean - what's that supposed to convey!?
 
Originally posted by M5Power
As opposed to Britney Spears covering the sides of her face with black gloves? I mean - what's that supposed to convey!?

It looks like you have a picture of a Joshua Tree that you cut from a newspaper, scanned, and saved it, and re-saved it over and over, switching file formats just to lessen the already ****ty picture quality even more. What is that supposed to convey - other than your homoerotic fantasies for U2?
 
Originally posted by Josh
It looks like you have a picture of a Joshua Tree that you cut from a newspaper, scanned, and saved it, and re-saved it over and over, switching file formats just to lessen the already ****ty picture quality even more. What is that supposed to convey - other than your homoerotic fantasies for U2?
His erotic fantasies over the tree itself. Duh?
 
Originally posted by Josh
It looks like you have a picture of a Joshua Tree that you cut from a newspaper, scanned, and saved it, and re-saved it over and over, switching file formats just to lessen the already ****ty picture quality even more.


I'm in the process of developing a new, high-quality tree for use beginning in late November. But one of the reasons it's so good is that it's so qualityless - the picture's sixteen years old, and it's rare to find colour copies of it. Everybody agrees - my avatar 0wnz0rz j00 and Timmotheus. And Sage. And GilesGuthrie.

What is that supposed to convey - other than your homoerotic fantasies for U2?

It shows an image of the coolest place on Earth!
 
Originally posted by M5Power
and it's rare to find colour copies of it.

Yeah, it was pretty hard, it took all of 3 minutes.:odd:

Note: Original quality was much better, but I had to save it to post it.
 

Attachments

  • jtree.jpg
    jtree.jpg
    40.5 KB · Views: 180
Idiot, that isn't the tree. Stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid.

Anybody can find any tree - the major point of this one is the symbolism.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
Idiot, that isn't the tree. Stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid, stupid.

Anybody can find any tree - the major point of this one is the symbolism.

"This is the famous Joshua Tree, for which the park and a U2 album are named."

Oh, my apologies.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
:odd:

I don't think it's saying it's the famous Joshua Tree. Just the famous Joshua Tree in general. The park, and album, were named after the famous Joshua Tree, but the picture on the album was of a different Joshua Tree. Know what I mean?:odd:

Or something.
 

Latest Posts

Back