What is wrong with the developers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PiRacingChamp
  • 15 comments
  • 993 views
Messages
264
Messages
piracingchamp
I just spent 6+ hours at Suzuka, and only received 345K for 1st place. I could have spent 1/2 hr at indy, and made as much or more. Worst part is, I love the endurance races. But, shouldn't they be worth considerably more? All winnings, across the board, should be proportional.
 
You got more XP than you would have otherwise.

This has been covered already.
 
Doesn't matter, the credits should be more proportional, along with the XP. That's allot of seat time, for not many credits.
 
With 10,000,000 credit and up car prices, yes they should be worth much more.

PD is the only one that doesn't seem to know that.
 
Agreed. XP might get me to the next level, but won't buy anything.
 
Try 70-80,000 for 4 hours on the Nurburgring.
 
and the answer tp this topic's question is......

















nothing
 
Along with others, I was venting. And since this seems to be an opinion shared by many, your smarta$$ response was not warranted, period! And, BTW, you can't spell, or use a spellchecker. Are you an English professor? One smarta$$ response deserves another.
 
There is nothing wrong with the developers.
 
I just spent 6+ hours at Suzuka, and only received 345K for 1st place. I could have spent 1/2 hr at indy, and made as much or more. Worst part is, I love the endurance races. But, shouldn't they be worth considerably more? All winnings, across the board, should be proportional.

I second this. Trying to get into the PD's minds maybe they didn't raise the credits to extend the games life. So that you redo events to buy the pricier cars. It would be nicer to have more events, an issue many have addressed, and thus spend more money on different cars just to finish the game and so everyone is pleased - easy goers and speed runners alike.
So I would say what is wrong with the developers is that they haven't met the expectations of the most demanding players for having a more balanced game. It's easy to say that though when you are an outsider and don't know the problems that arose during development. (most probably the high standard of physics and graphics and bad time management)
 
I don't see a problem with the developers. They released a game in November that we are all still playing in March. They continue to listen to the community and patch the game with the changes we ask for.

Maybe you should stop complaining?
 
I don't see a problem with the developers. They released a game in November that we are all still playing in March. They continue to listen to the community and patch the game with the changes we ask for.

Maybe you should stop complaining?

Here, I'll fix that for you.

"I see a problem with the developers. They released an unfinished game in November that we are all still waiting to be fixed in March. They continue to pretend to listen to the community and patch the game with the changes we didn't ask for."

Maybe you should stop working for PD, your opinion might change a little.
 
Well, isn't that cute? I haven't heard that one before. It'd be nice to work for Polyphony Digital, but I don't speak Japanese.
 
I just spent 6+ hours at Suzuka, and only received 345K for 1st place. I could have spent 1/2 hr at indy, and made as much or more. Worst part is, I love the endurance races. But, shouldn't they be worth considerably more? All winnings, across the board, should be proportional.

It's a subpar reward. But hey, you got yourself a rare car -- in UCD terms: The GT-R Concept LM Race Car. It makes up half or 3/4 of the race, but It can whole again if PD bumped up the reward more, like around 1-3 million Credits or something a lot more or a bit more.
 
Back