What would happen if a nuclear bomb goes off in space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter G.T
  • 13 comments
  • 5,653 views

G.T

Messages
11,462
United Kingdom
U.K
Messages
Paganisterr
Messages
Ak Paganister
I know they do in Battlestar Glactica, but I'm wondering if it's actually possible.

This is if you just launched the actual bomb into space - no air around it (not being in a spacecraft, etc). Would it actually explode, or will it not be as dramatic as down here on Earth?
 
An oxygen atmosphere is not a requirement for a nuclear explosion. It would explode, the material from the bomb would expand extremely rapidly (the very definition of explosion) and anything nearby (satellites, orbiting stations, whatnot) would be plastered by the shock wave. In addition, EMP effect would knock out unhardened electronics over a VERY large area.

And Battlestar Galactica is SUCH a good reference for space physics.
 
There wouldn't be any fire I suppose as there is no oxygen in space, only Hydrogen and Helium (He and H) if I got it, correct me if I'm wrong. But I'm pretty sure it wouldn't be as dramatic as on earth...
 
To follow up with a probably stupid question.

If space has hydrogen in it. Why doesn't space explode with fire like hydrogen?
 
Because what counts for 'atmosphere' in microgravity (space) is something like 1 hydrogen atom per several thousand cubic yards of volume, so it cannot support combustion.
 
http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/conghand/nuclear.htm

If a nuclear weapon is exploded in a vacuum-i. e., in space-the complexion of weapon effects changes drastically:

First, in the absence of an atmosphere, blast disappears completely.

Second, thermal radiation, as usually defined, also disappears. There is no longer any air for the blast wave to heat and much higher frequency radiation is emitted from the weapon itself.
 
To follow up with a probably stupid question.

If space has hydrogen in it. Why doesn't space explode with fire like hydrogen?

Hydrogen + Fire -> Hydrogen + Oxygen -> BANG!

Combustion of hydrogen requires oxygen and forms water vapour.
 
Because what counts for 'atmosphere' in microgravity (space) is something like 1 hydrogen atom per several thousand cubic yards of volume, so it cannot support combustion.

This may be a stupid question...

Why is the sun exempt then? As effectively, that is a nuclear reaction isn't it?
 
(Duke/Famine, correct me if I'm wrong)

The sun is a nuclear reaction. Burning stuff isn't.

All the stuff required for a nuclear reaction is found in the nuclei.
Fusion: two (or more) nuclei ram into each other and fuse.
Fission: a neutron hits a heavy nuclei (typically 238U) which spilts,and releases another neutron. Neutrons are found in the nuclei themselves - this self-sustainment is what allows stars to "burn" in space.

Basically, combustion requires external input (the input of oxygen), which is why it doesn't (can't) happen in space.
 
But, if a Nuclear weapon is just reproducing what the sun does only on a smaller scale (correct me if I'm wrong) then surely a Nuke released in space would still explode and create some kind of fireball? As the sun is one massive fireball isn't it? (Obviously with the nuclear reaction causing it).

I may be way off course here though.
 
Explosives contain their own oxidizers, so even a conventional bomb would explode in space. A nuclear bomb, either fission or fusion, would also explode. And there WOULD be a shock wave. All that stuff that used to be in the bomb casing is matter, not vacuum, and carries the full force of the explosion in a wavefront.

A nuclear reaction is not something burning, even though there's really a lot of heat produced. Since it's not something being burned, oxygen plays no part in it.

The sun's fusion reaction is supported by its own weight, gravity slamming hydrogen atoms together with enough force to make helium atoms and all sorts of fun radiations, including heat.

You couldn't light a rag in a bottle of gasoline on the moon's surface and expect anything to happen. You could surprise your friends with a grenade, though, or wipe them out with a thermonuclear device. Those would work just fine.

There is no lack of blast, and there is no lack of heat. Saying that without air you can't have a blast wave is not exactly correct.

A supernova is a very effective thermonuclear explosion. Quite large, very bright, cleans out anything in its path, and expands for centuries.

Tell us again, please, how lack of oxygen dilutes the effects?
 
(Duke/Famine, correct me if I'm wrong)

The sun is a nuclear reaction. Burning stuff isn't.

[...]

Basically, combustion requires external input (the input of oxygen), which is why it doesn't (can't) happen in space.

Burning things (fire) is a combustion reaction. Combustion doesn't happen in space because space lacks the reactants to yield a combustion reaction.

But, if a Nuclear weapon is just reproducing what the sun does only on a smaller scale (correct me if I'm wrong) then surely a Nuke released in space would still explode and create some kind of fireball? As the sun is one massive fireball isn't it? (Obviously with the nuclear reaction causing it).

No, the sun is a giant fusion reaction. The sun is more of a massive energyball instead of a fireball. Most reactions don't yield fire, yet still give off plenty of energy (like heat and light in the case of the sun).
 
Sureshot, you just need to stop thinking of the Sun as a gigantic fireball. Although it looks like one, it's actually not.
 
Oh right.

*walks off in embarrasment.

It really does look like one, especially when on programmes like the sky at night they show it 'spouting fire'.
 
Back