who think the top gear test track should be coneless and have full runway access

  • Thread starter Thread starter FuSiioN_HaVoC
  • 39 comments
  • 4,589 views

Keep the cones or get rid of them, full runway access or the limited access


  • Total voters
    115
  • Poll closed .
It's not cheating if you have Penalties on.
 
I always thought that invisible walls were a game-breaker. Since when does hitting nothing damage your car?!
 
The whole Top Gear concept/track in the game is pathetic anyway.
When we first heard about the addition of the Top Gear Test Track in GT5, the speculation about how "awesome" it would be was so far off the mark it wasn't funny. I have never been a fan of the figure-8 track but it could have had the potential to be a great addition to GT5. Instead, like a lot of other things with GT5, it has become bland and boring.
 
Ignoring all the posts above. I think it's fine how it should be. If the first option was given, then there would no longer be a "good" lobby on that track. No fun in it at all.
 
I remember hitting a cone having the front pop up, it slamming down, and trying to control it.. VERY FUN. :dopey:
 
EliteDreamer
Ignoring all the posts above. I think it's fine how it should be. If the first option was given, then there would no longer be a "good" lobby on that track. No fun in it at all.

I don't think I've ever found a good lobby on the Top Gear track, just crowds of ignorant kids in Veyrons and X2010s trying to out-noob each other...at least having the full open runway and stuff would make it a FUN free roam track where you can just drive, rather than an abused racing circuit with invisible walls to wreck your car when you get rammed by a drag racing Viper
 
count me in for full access, and again I'm aghast at those against it...such selfishness "I like the game as it is so I don't want an option that will make others like it a bit more" <-- lose the attitude people it's a disgrace to the GT5 community.
 
Back