- 1,735

- Orlando FL
- MontalvoMC
- MontalvoMC
I wanted to see how many people think that the description in GT Auto was correct.
It claims that adding aero part will create downforce but this applies to the front of some cars(ex McLaren F1 25 front downforce) and wings added. I do understand the fact that standards would lack frond downforce due to the lack if front aero upgrade but there are standards that have adjustable front aero like the R390 road car and Cien.
Maybe PD could make a generic Front Lip for all standards and Premiums for some adjustable front aero. This will allow our street cars to be more competive. Seeing race cars only dominate because their downforce.
I'm sure that the wing we add to the back of our cars are the same size and weight as some race cars but they only produce 20 "points" of downforce. I don't care if the front aero goes only up to 15 that's is honestly all I née to keep the nose down on my F40 on the bumps at the ring. I'm sorry if this post is out of place I want to know your view on this please discuss your opinions.
It claims that adding aero part will create downforce but this applies to the front of some cars(ex McLaren F1 25 front downforce) and wings added. I do understand the fact that standards would lack frond downforce due to the lack if front aero upgrade but there are standards that have adjustable front aero like the R390 road car and Cien.
Maybe PD could make a generic Front Lip for all standards and Premiums for some adjustable front aero. This will allow our street cars to be more competive. Seeing race cars only dominate because their downforce.
I'm sure that the wing we add to the back of our cars are the same size and weight as some race cars but they only produce 20 "points" of downforce. I don't care if the front aero goes only up to 15 that's is honestly all I née to keep the nose down on my F40 on the bumps at the ring. I'm sorry if this post is out of place I want to know your view on this please discuss your opinions.