- 1,508
- StReeTz166
Would you looky thereThanks for the tip 👍 I've just noticed a error I made on the 1st pic, the place where I removed the watermark looks a bit out of place![]()
Would you looky thereThanks for the tip 👍 I've just noticed a error I made on the 1st pic, the place where I removed the watermark looks a bit out of place![]()
I think the Saubers are very good (Wish I had one) keep it up. Wasnt to keen on you're Ford GT shots (Please dont kill me violently with a chainsaw) thats just my opinion though dont take it to harshly cant wait for your next bunch.
The hardest thing with the 787B (along with just about any photo's with moving objects in them, example: Tsuk cones) is that the planes only appear once in the photo, take it once, they don't come back.That 787B must've been hard (Red Arrow). Doesn't the jet appear only once when you begin a race at Sarthe? I Like the airborne and tilted cars, but I really don't find the plain regular snapshots very appealing.Everyone seems to like it, but I don't see what's good about them. I can accept drifting photos and funky stuff, but this. I really don't understand what's so "nice" about them. Someone Mind clarifying me on that.
P.S. with the multiple cars photos, Were some of those AIs? If so, How did you take shots from non-photo drives?
P.S. Most of your photos are Way too Bright.
Go onto one of the 24h le mans races, make sure you set up the photo before you take it, if you come out of the taken photo you can't get them back unless you start the replay again.i like the third shot out of all of them. now, how on earth do u guys get the damn planes to come out ? is it a code thing or what? can someone tell me please?
It's all GT4, no real stuff in there. I didn't use lens flair, but it sure does look like itlooking good sierra. did u like crop those trees from somewherelse? they look real. and did u use lens flare on the first pic ? anyways. i like the photos. but i wish you used a bit more contrast. but either way i like them. good job dude!