What movies have you seen lately? Now with reviews!Movies 

  • Thread starter Thread starter scentedsoap
  • 8,275 comments
  • 562,332 views
I liked Brokeback Mountain. A lot. Not exactly in that way (though Heathbaby is pretty cute), but I thought it was a good story, well played and paced. I mean, we're talking about most of a person's adult life here.

With the hurricane remnants wiping out my weekend, we curled up with the big TV and some free on-demand horror from the cable company:

THEY - 7/10. Not exactly predictable, but not a single bit of broken ground, either. Competently-done genre horror that goes for atmosphere and glimpsed monstrosities rather than simple outright shock (this is a compliment). The main character is a psychology grad student overcoming some personal traumas, but other than that relatively stock characters do the time-honored horror movie dance of isolating themselves somewhere so they can be attacked by dream creatures from their childhoods. This movie had an opportunity to do something interesting with the nature of real insanity versus unbelievable reality, which it completely left lying on the table at the end. As it sits, it's neither a scary-but-real study of delusion nor a balls-out supernatural fright fest. Nonetheless, worth watching if you are looking for a decent horror flick to pass the time.

Silent Hill - 8/10. I've never played the games, and now I wish I had before seeing this movie. As a movie adaptation of a video game, it not only didn't suck (which is high praise enough), it managed to be an intriguing and suspenseful horror movie on its own merits. Unlike THEY, which should have kept its monsters inside the protagonist's head, Silent Hill is unapologetic supernatural horror fantasy. Nearly everything about it is well-executed with a few exceptions in the characterizations (Sean Bean's character is mostly pointless except to provide hands to dig up some info that might have been difficult to bring out otherwise, and to demonstrate the phase/world/whatever-shift between our world and the evil inside Silent Hill). It's a complement to the movie that I can imagine myself crapping my pants while playing the videogame in a dark room. While the fundamental question of "how the hell is all this happening" isn't really answered, you at least get most of the who and why behind it at the end, and there are lots of interesting little details that crop up throughout. I'd watch it again, definitely, but I may even want to go get the games and play them first.

Donnie Darko - 6/10... or 9/10? I'm still not sure. I didn't get to watch this straight through with no interruptions and so I may need to watch it again. This was not the Director's Cut, which some say is worse and some say is better. There is a book in this movie that is critical to any shred of understanding, and either I didn't pay enough attention, or they didn't cover it enough. Nonetheless, this is an intriguing study (again) of the nature of insanity and what it might really be. Donnie is a troubled teen suffering from borderline schizophrenia who is placed in a position to save the world from being trapped in a glitch in time. Other forces are acting behind the scenes as he slides away from what he knew as reality. It's not capital-H horror per se, but it is suspenseful and thought-provoking and entertaining. It's also a well-made cross-genre character study and full of respectful nods to all kinds of other movie genres. In the end it dwells in horror and suspense but is ultimately much more than just that.
 
Silent Hill - 8/10. I've never played the games, and now I wish I had before seeing this movie. As a movie adaptation of a video game, it not only didn't suck (which is high praise enough), it managed to be an intriguing and suspenseful horror movie on its own merits. Unlike THEY, which should have kept its monsters inside the protagonist's head, Silent Hill is unapologetic supernatural horror fantasy. Nearly everything about it is well-executed with a few exceptions in the characterizations (Sean Bean's character is mostly pointless except to provide hands to dig up some info that might have been difficult to bring out otherwise, and to demonstrate the phase/world/whatever-shift between our world and the evil inside Silent Hill). It's a complement to the movie that I can imagine myself crapping my pants while playing the videogame in a dark room. While the fundamental question of "how the hell is all this happening" isn't really answered, you at least get most of the who and why behind it at the end, and there are lots of interesting little details that crop up throughout. I'd watch it again, definitely, but I may even want to go get the games and play them first.
I have yet to see this film but from the opinions I've read about it (including yours) I think I'll like it.

And yeah, you should definitely get the games, specially Silent Hill and Silent Hill 3. They're awesome.
 


City Lights (1931) -- I've always been wary of Chaplin... from the few bits I'd seen, his humour seemed to be very forced and causal... but this movie had me laughing out loud so many times! It's hilarious! And the ending is sure to bring a tear out. Amazingly enough, in the era when most movies were already with sound, City Lights was/is silent, and it still managed to be more popular than most sound movies of the time. To the point that the ending of the movie is said to be the best ending of all time. The movie is also #74 in IMDb's Top 250. 10/10



Once Upon a Time in China Trilogy (1991-1993) -- This is an amazing trilogy. Though the continuity of them sets them at a point where save for a few details you could watch them in any order, it's basically different legends mashed together with a common character. Jet Li is amazing in the fight scenes and as the typical Chinese man who is wary of foreigners but still respects them... and the movie is also about respect and honour, be it for your family, friends, disciples and even enemies. The movie, like so many other king-fu movies is ruined by the dubbing, even in the original language. There's also the point of the female object, where a woman's only job is to get in trouble and not be able to even throw a slap in the right direction. But with all that, it's a trilogy worth watching. 7.5/10
 
Munich - (8/10) I really enjoyed the first two hours of this movie. But then it began to slow down. And by the end it was suddenly a bit preachy, especially with the CGI shot of the World Trade Center. But the writing, acting, and everything else was incredible. I haven't read the book Vengeance, which this is based on so I cannot say if the slowness and preachiness are all just Spielberg following the source material or not. As for the preachiness; we got it already. Becoming like your enemy does not solve anything. Definitely worth a watch.
 
Kung Fu Panda

About what I was expecting - not the best animated movie I've ever seen.

In fact, I thought the story line was a bit lacking. Dragged on too long for a kids movie like that, and it was only about 90mins I think! :crazy:

And I don't like Jack Black.

goldstargf0.gif
goldstargf0.gif
goldstargf0.gif
goldstargf0.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
 
Hot Fuzz - 10/10. What a funny movie. I honestly wasn't expecting it to be that good at all.

Really? It gave me the opposite effect. I thought it was going to be great but it ended up being not that great at all...

I'm really excited and anticipating to watch Righteous Kill and Lakeview Terrace.
 
Really? It gave me the opposite effect. I thought it was going to be great but it ended up being not that great at all...

Yeah, Shawn of the Dead is high on my list, but Hot Fuzz was just amusing, not hilarious.
 
Probably depends on which one you watch first. I saw Hot Fuzz first and liked it better than Shaun of the Dead.
 
I've seen a lot of old stuff lately and here is some of them:

amadeusio2.jpg


Amadeus (1984) Director's Cut -- This is a must see classic. Personaly I think this movie is almost perfect, the actors fits like gloves in their characters. Very well filmed, well told and of course the music is amazing. (Winner of 8 Academy Awards) 9/10

savingprivateryanver2sp4.jpg


Saving Private Ryan (1998) -- This is the best 2nd world war movie I've ever seen, if not the best of any war movies I've seen. I think Tom Hanks can get into pretty much any character you can get into and he does it well also in this one. It's one of those movies you watch with your eyes wide open during the whole thing and you don't want to miss a thing. (Winner of 5 Academy Awards) 8.5/10

pulpfictionhistorkyzpodlt8.jpg


Pulp Fiction (1994) -- This I think is my favorite movie. The script is perfectly written and it's both the coolest and funniest movie at the same time! (Winner of Academy Award) 10/10
 
Pulp Fiction (1994) -- This I think is my favorite movie. The script is perfectly written and it's both the coolest and funniest movie at the same time! (Winner of Academy Award) 10/10

I think you were a bit far too entertained if you think it's the coolest & funniest movie at the same time. :p It's definitely an interesting movie, but I can't recall how many of my friends who simply get lost in the plot, or lack of.

But, if you liked Pulp Fiction, you might like Sin City. It's not funny, but a very interesting comic series that follows a nearly identical outline of events. Tarantino was a guest director for it, along side his equivalent, Rodriguez & Frank Miller.
 
Reventón;3153277
But, if you liked Pulp Fiction, you might like Sin City. It's not funny, but a very interesting comic series that follows a nearly identical outline of events. Tarantino was a guest director for it, along side his equivalent, Rodriguez & Frank Miller.
Yeah I know, have it on DVD.
 
Last edited:
Reventón;3153308
Oh. Well then, you know how awesome it is. :D
Yup! Elijah Wood's role is funny, going from Frodo to that people eating psyco! :lol:

Also like Reservoir Dogs, Kill Bill (both volumes) and Death Proof ;). Haven't seen Jackie Brown yet :ouch:.
 
Last edited:
Yup! Elijah Wood's role is funny, going from Frodo to that people eating psyco! :lol:

Also like Reservoir Dogs, Kill Bill (both volumes) and Death Proof ;). Haven't seen Jackie Brown yet :ouch:.
I have the tenth anniversary special edition of Reservoir Dogs. Haven't watched it, surprisingly. :dunce: But, I haven't seen Jackie Brown either.
 
I think Jackie Brown was a very uncompromising Tarantino film... it has its twists and turns, but nothing a 12 yearl old couldn't figure out, tbh. The guy who Robert De Niro plays is probably the best character in the movie, though.

As for me:



Flags of Our Fathers (2006) -- Good, but not stellar. Based on the true (and relatively unknown) story of six regular soldiers who raised the flag atop the isle of Iwo Jima and whose picture of the effort became synonymous with an impending victory of the war, the movie follows the lives of the survivors and their tour across the US trying to get funding for the war effort. There's a few racial issues set forth and lots of political negatives, and basically the movie is about those points. It's classified as a war flick, and the combat parts are fairly brutal, but mostly it's a political movie. 7/10



Brève traversée (a.k.a. Brief Crossing) (2001) -- French movie about a 16 year old boy and a 30-something woman who meet on a boat and start exchanging ideas on life... which end them having sex together and little else. The movie is directed and written by Catherine Breillat, who always makes dramas about the female sexuality and how great women are at anything, whereas men are nothing but erect pieces of meat who fall for women because they can't think for themselves. The movie goes on to tell many exmaples of this and how at 16 men still are immature enough to be able to listen to a woman... blah blah blah. Feminist crap like this reminds me when I was seven years old and my mum would say all kinds of things about my dad. 2/10



Hancock (2008) -- Almost everyone's seen it... those who haven't just need to know it's a pretty light movie about a superheroe who needs a bit of image cleansing. I hear a lot of people bashing it, but hey what do you expect? It's a Hollywood blockbuster with Wil Smith in. The movie itself isn't bad, as long as you don't take it all too seriously... as I said, a light movie. 6/10
 
I must be too old, but I just refuse to think that Quentin Tarantino is God's Gift To Modern Filmmaking.

He's incredibly self-indulgent as a filmmaker, and while he sometimes gets interesting stuff going, ultimately his films lack any real point other than to show how cool his films are. To have being cool as your only reason for being, you have to be really cool, and Tarantino is not really that cool.
 
I agree as well. I've always thought Tarantino to be overrated... I've said so in this very thread many times. Then again, who really reads my posts?

When I call Jackie Brown an uncompromising Taratino movie I mean that it doesn't have as many plot holes as the usual or as many dead bodies left in the wake of the plot... which certainly doesn't mean I like it... Reservoir Dogs was great, but everything after has been one big meh after another. You want to see really good directing? Go see Hitchcock, Billy Wilder, David Fincher, David Lynch (if you can follow the plot), the Coen brothers, Scorcese, Terrence Malick, Hayao Miyazaki, David Cronenberg, Luc Besson (to a point), Takashi Miike, Frank Capra, Howard hawkes, Stanley Kubrick, Akira Kurosawa, Ingmar Bergman, or Luis Buñuel.

Most of them will guarantee a good movie to watch.
 
Last edited:
... Reservoir Dogs was great, but everything after has been one big meh after another.

You should watch City on Fire from 1987 starring Chow Yun-Fat. You will notice how unoriginal Reservoir Dogs is after watching it. I think Tarantino became popular because his early flilms had some hilarious dialogue at a time when many, or most movies, had gotten away from dialogue in favour of action.
 
I must be too old, but I just refuse to think that Quentin Tarantino is God's Gift To Modern Filmmaking.

He's incredibly self-indulgent as a filmmaker, and while he sometimes gets interesting stuff going, ultimately his films lack any real point other than to show how cool his films are. To have being cool as your only reason for being, you have to be really cool, and Tarantino is not really that cool.
Tarantino has one skill that appeals to me. Entertaining dialog. He relies on language a bit too much, but he can make a room full of guys just talking (Reservoir Dogs) interesting.

I agree though that his actual storytelling has a lot to be desired as he has plot devices just for the sake of it and eventually in the end his goal is to make sure it is "cool."

Other good dialog movies:
The Big Kahuna
Suicide Kings
The Usual Suspects

If nothing else these show that it can be done without the effort to be cool, and you can actually use it to tell your story, or tell a lie in one of those cases.


Anyway, last night I watched the most recent version of The Island of Dr. Moreau - (5/10) I just finished reading the HG Wells story not long ago and thought I would see how it plays out on film as Wells didn't do a great job of describing the man-beasts. Don't bother. This was horrible. It changed the book for the sake of complication. In the book you distrust Moreau, not because of the experiments, but for his treatment of the creatures. The movie makes you distrust him because his experiments require human DNA, something the book did not use. The book was purely animals and the only moral implication was animal cruelty, and the religious aspects of the time, which is why he fled society. Wells himself said that Moreau was something he wishes he hadn't written, seeing it as one of his poorer works. Hollywood made it even worse.
 
[OT]
Though I haven't heard it yet, I read that the RffTx version of that movie is hilarious
[/OT]
 
Tropic Thunder

This was the only movie we could see, so that kind of explains it really.

If I had a choice I wouldn't have chosen to see it.

It was good to see Tom Cruise in there - something away from his usual fare. He was the highlight for me, and he's not a main character.

Stiller, who I don't mind that much, was average. I don't like Jack Black, and he was crap (I think he's unnecessarily OTT). Steve Coogan should have been good, but I found him lacking and he came across as a bumbling idiot.

There are a couple of lines that are very funny, but they're not enough to make up for it...

My advice: give it a miss.

goldstargf0.gif
goldstargf0.gif
goldstargf0.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
 
Stargate Continuum

I watched it last night on Bluray and enjoyed the movie. Just getting to see all of the SG-1 team together again was nice! 👍 It seems every time I watch SG-1 I remember exactly why I liked the series so much. This movie was a nice adventure and felt like a bit of a throwback to earlier SG-1 adventures. I thought the movie could have had some more action in it, but there was not too much else to detract from the movie.
 


Le Couperet (a.k.a. Arcàdia) (2005) -- Belgian-French-Spanish film by acclaimed director Costa-Gavras (État de Siège and a bunch of foreign films you've probably never heard of)... the plot in this one is quite good: this guy loses his job to outsourcing. Two years later and still jobless, he hits on a solution: to genuinely eliminate his competition... so he goes on popping everyone with a similar resume to his. The ending is quite real-world and the coolness of the character's reasoning is very slick. Sort of crime comedy, or dark humour movie. 8/10



Dog Day Afternoon (1975) -- Probably one of the best-written crime dramas in history. Based on the true story about a bank robbery that turns into a hostage situation and in turn, into a media circus. Al Pacino does what could be one of his best performances ever, which he lost in the Oscars to Jack Nicholson's from One Flew.... The movie's #160 in IMDb's Top 250... for me it's 9/10
 
I agree as well. I've always thought Tarantino to be overrated... I've said so in this very thread many times. Then again, who really reads my posts?

I fully agree (oh, and I read your posts...)

I think in many ways he's fallen into routine, and like some other directors (M. Night I'm looking at you) has become quite predictable. Reservoir Dogs was a well paced/structured film. Most of his films after that (besides his brilliantly funny ending to "Four Rooms", has been predictable action/comedy fair.

You want to see really good directing? Go see Hitchcock, Billy Wilder, David Fincher, David Lynch (if you can follow the plot), the Coen brothers, Scorcese, Terrence Malick, Hayao Miyazaki, David Cronenberg, Luc Besson (to a point), Takashi Miike, Frank Capra, Howard hawkes, Stanley Kubrick, Akira Kurosawa, Ingmar Bergman, or Luis Buñuel.

Most of them will guarantee a good movie to watch.

You just named off most of my favorite directors. David Lynch being one of my favorite just due to his creativity and willingness to step so far outside the box. I would add a few directors to that list. Darren Aronofsky, and Christopher Nolan (to a lesser degree), off the top of my head. Aronofsky's work on Requiem for a Dream (while not always easy to watch), was visionary. Not to mention the brilliant film "Pi" which I'm sure needs no introduction (at least to some of you).

I must say "Le Couperet" looks very interesting. I will check it out ASAP. Thank you for the recommendation.



;)
 
dang, how could I forget Aronofsky... Pi was on my Top Ten for a very long time. Requiem was in the Top 1
 
dang, how could I forget Aronofsky... Pi was on my Top Ten for a very long time. Requiem was in the Top 1

His last film (The Fountain) wasn't quite to the same level as his previous work, in my opinion. Yet, it still managed to be better than many other films out there. My problem was with the casting. I'm not a huge fan of Rachel Weisz, and Hugh Jackman's resume isn't exactly stellar. They seemed strange choices for an Aronofsky film. The film itself is very beautiful. Wonderfully shot with very little CG used. If you've seen the film, you know what a feet it is to achieve such special effects without the use of CG. Of course, the editing was spectacular, as it is with all his films. The story was good, although not as poignant as "Requiem for a Dream" or "Pi".



;)
 
I have The Fountain in line... I'll let you know when I watch it.

I'm currently watching Bird, though I'm having to do some installments on it and watch 30 minutes every now and then. I love jazz and the story is really good, but I lack the time to focus all of my mind on it right now.
 
Last edited:
Stiller, who I don't mind that much, was average. I don't like Jack Black, and he was crap (I think he's unnecessarily OTT). Steve Coogan should have been good, but I found him lacking and he came across as a bumbling idiot.

There are a couple of lines that are very funny, but they're not enough to make up for it...

How was Jack Black's acting crap? His character was an addict, so his acting in the movie wasn't supposed to be subtle, civil, or reasonable.

In all honesty, your reasons are lacking. You complain about Black & Coogan, and then give it a 3 star? You completely threw away your thoughts on 97% rest of the movie.
 
Reventón;3156280
How was Jack Black's acting crap? His character was an addict, so his acting in the movie wasn't supposed to be subtle, civil, or reasonable.

In all honesty, your reasons are lacking. You complain about Black & Coogan, and then give it a 3 star? You completely threw away your thoughts on 97% rest of the movie.
Like I said. I thought Black was unnecessarily over-the-top. Sure, it was a comedy, but I think he could have done a better job at pulling off an addict.

As for the rest of the movie, I guess it just wasn't to my liking. For instance, the retard that Stiller plays (I can't remember the name), I just thought it was stupid. An excuse to 'laugh at the retard!'. I didn't think it was offensive or morally wrong or anything like that, I just thought it was stupid. I mean, 7 year old kids in the playground will pretend to be retards to get laughs...

I prefer Stiller's work in Meet The Parents and There's Something About Mary. They're on another level to this movie, which is lowest common denominator, slapstick, basic level comedy. Perhaps I like it a little more advanced than that?...


Anyway:


Stranded: I Have Come from a Plane That Crashed on the Mountains

This is probably the best foreign film I've ever seen. But, I haven't seen many foreign films.

This was screened as part of our local film festival - the best festival we've had in many years, if not ever.

This movie is about the "Alive" plane crash, and is told by survivors. It has scenes of them revisiting the crash site in the summer of 2006, as well as re-enactments of the events during and after the crash.

It was great to get a better understanding of what went on after the crash, and how they handled the situations. And what they thought about before finally turning to the human flesh, and their thoughts surrounding this.

I had no idea they were stranded for so long. I always thought it was somewhere around 20-30 days. Three times that long! Wow. And the cold...

And then finally the supe human effort it took for the 'expedition' party to walk out of the mountains to get help.

An amazing story, and I recommend it.

goldstargf0.gif
goldstargf0.gif
goldstargf0.gif
goldstargf0.gif
goldstargf0.gif
goldstargf0.gif
goldstargf0.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
greystarlt2.gif
 
Back