About close-ratio gear boxes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Lupo
  • 6 comments
  • 2,101 views
Messages
36
Portugal
Lisboa/Portugal
Messages
lupo_55
About close-ratio gear boxes

After analyzing all my personal tunes I came to a conclusion regarding gear box ratios that I decided to share with you.

But first let me say that - for racing purposes - I am a big fan of “close-ratio” gear boxes. On GT5 I tend to use, on almost every car, the already well known process of “maximize FD – minimize top speed – readjust FD to the desired top speed”.

But I noticed that, in many cases, that simple process sets the top speed &#8211; and sometimes even the previous one - with an overdrive ratio (< 1). That may still be OK when the ratio stays greater than say, 0.950, but in some cases it&#8217;ll be set too low (for my taste).

I don&#8217;t like overdrive gears for racing purposes. That was invented mainly to reduce fuel consumption on our regular, daily use, boring cars.
When it exists on race cars (at least on GT5), it&#8217;s only useful on circuits with looooong straights like Le Mans-Mulsanne (or&#8230; Daytona). Besides, this is the reason why LM cars are the ones having, not just one, but in some cases even two, overdrive top gears.

Most of the time, in the vast majority of GT5 circuits, we&#8217;d be better with a gear box that can take advantage of the power band of our car&#8217;s engine: one with close-ratio and with as many gears as possible.

I know what some of you may be thinking at this time: in manual, more gears means more work => more trouble (=> more&#8230; fun&#8230;?!). I agree!
But one thing is our human &#8220;weariness&#8221; and another is the undeniable fact (pls excuse my emphasis) that more speeds on the gear box allow a better utilization of the engine power and torque.

The point here being&#8230;

&#8230;try to determine a gear ratio spread that, on automatic, may allow us to use the break pedal to shift a gear down&#8230;

At least using a wheel &#8211; in my case a DFGT - that is very much feasible. More effectively with some cars (those with 7-speed gear boxes) than others (with 6 or less). Before the turn all I have to do is to briefly kick the break pedal thus shifting down one gear at a time.

So&#8230; the results of my analysis of the average gear settings and spreads (as GT5 sets them) of my (+100) tunes, mostly set to close-ratio are the following:
gb_avg.gif

(here, decimal point is comma !)

Or, graphically...
gb_graph.gif

The calculated settings to eliminate overdrive, by setting top speed to be direct (1:1) and incrementing the next ratio by nearly the same &#8220;drop percentage&#8221; as the initial settings, are:

gb_calc.gif

(values rounded to the 2nd decimal for ease of use)

In some cases the range of values allowed by the game for the individual gears (namely for 1st and even 2nd gears) will not permit you to use the above (general) values. In those cases you may have to compromise a bit and give one or two clicks &#8220;to the right&#8221; on the max speed (increasing it) to get compliable ranges. Of course, when doing that you&#8217;ll be widening the total ratio spread, or in other words getting a... &#8220;not-so-close&#8221; gear box.

A final word to say that a simple way of getting rid off overdrive ratios is &#8211;after having maximized the Final Drive - to simply select a value for max speed that sets the top gear around 1,000 (thus, and again, obtaining a &#8220;not-so-close&#8221; gear box).

Note 1: The cars involved have power (and torque) more than enough to dismiss its consideration in the above reasoning; namely regarding the resultant efficiency of 1st gears (see note 2).
Note 2: 1st gear is very seldom used on GT5 events.
Note 3: This is a generalization founded on an average of many different cars; there are clearly &#8220;atypical&#8221; situations like f.i. the Bentley Speed 8 (and other LM cars!).
Note 4: I omitted the few 3, 4 & 8-speed cars due to its "irrelevancy" in the game..
 
I am trying to decipher the point you are trying to get across and maybe I am missing it.

a statement like a gear ratio < 1.000 is bad because it is an overdrive ratio is wrong

power to the wheels = torque * gear ratio * final drive

let's take a simple example, same car but with two different transmission setups:

i) top gear ratio: 0.500 final drive: 5.000 = overall gear ratio of 2.5

ii) top gear ratio: 1.250 final drive: 2.000 = overall gear ratio of 2.5

they are the same (will accelerate at the same speed, have the same top speed at the same rpm)

there is a bit of an unexplained glitch in gt5 where many cars with scenario ii) will accelerate slightly quicker than i) but for all intents and purposes they are the same.
 
…try to determine a gear ratio spread that, on automatic, may allow us to use the break pedal to shift a gear down…

I think you'll do better to set your (close) transmission for the top speed required at each track, then make individual adjustments to optimise gear changes on key corners.

As long as the shifts stay within the peak power band, I don't see why you need to be concerned about overdrive ratio.
 
I am trying to decipher the point you are trying to get across and maybe I am missing it.

a statement like a gear ratio < 1.000 is bad because it is an overdrive ratio is wrong

power to the wheels = torque * gear ratio * final drive
Yes, that goes without saying. "a statement like a gear ratio < 1.000 is bad because it is an overdrive ratio is wrong". Indeed. That's why I didn't state it was bad. I said I don't like it and it´s seldom used.


Your math about overall gear ratio and your conclusion are also obvious. But, please tell me: do you really toggle your FD at will - with all the freedom you exemplify above ? If so, when you go f.i. to a circuit like Madrid or London (...) how many times do you use the 7th gear if you set it to 0,500 ?
 
Last edited:
I think you'll do better to set your (close) transmission for the top speed required at each track, then make individual adjustments to optimise gear changes on key corners.
Well... let me see... yeap, that's precisely what I do :)(don't we all ?!:crazy:)

I just don't bother much to tune individual gears. I just try to keep all gears useable on a specific track. Maybe I didn't expressed myself clearly enough...
(Pls note that I named the thread "About close-ratio" not "About overdrive")
I'm not paticularly worried about overdrive. The objective is to narrow the overal spread as much as possible. And I can´t see how that can be done with top gear set to 0.500 (to use the above example)
 
Let me see if I can be more clear about the “overdrive issue”...
1)The intent of an overdrive ratio is to use a lower RPM to maintain a desired top speed (thus reducing unnecessary power production, and fuel consumption)
2) When racing, in order to keep the engine in its power band (between peak torque and peak power) we want to minimize the RPM drop when shifting up.
Knowing (I hope) that the RPM drop is calculated by:

newRPM.gif

Two examples below. First, an “wide ratio” and second, the resulting “close-ratio” gear box (in which we want to keep the proportion of RPM drop similar to the original).
Now, suppose that we are (and want to be, as much as possible) f.i. at 7000 RPM (within our power band) when shifting:

newRPM2.gif

As you can see, the shifting on the second box consistently keeps an higher RPM when shifting to an higher gear. Hence, complying with objective #2 above in a better way.
(note I said "better way", not the "only way")

Now may be the time for you to say I’m being to peaky about this (or should I say… too “shifty”?)...
I know I am.
But it's just for the sake of my statements above. I don’t care much about this level of detail. I was just saying.
 
Maybe off topic but Ive found that shorter gears are not always better. Sometimes when downshifting with too short a gear, it slows you down too much and therefore costs you valuable lap time.
Anyone else agree?
 
Back