Pagani F drops her top

  • Thread starter Thread starter McLaren
  • 30 comments
  • 1,743 views

Which is better?

  • Zonda F Coupe

    Votes: 27 56.3%
  • Zonda F Roadster

    Votes: 21 43.8%

  • Total voters
    48

McLaren

Premium
Messages
46,274
United States
Texas
http://paganiautomobili.it/

Verona, 25 Saturdays February 2006, 15,00 HOURS
Geneva, 28 Tuesdays February 2006, HOURS 9.00

16625.jpg

16621.jpg

16617.jpg



*Poll added for fun. :)
 
The weave :drool:

Coupe, with no paint, just the CF showing...
 
Not everything is about performance.

I have a coupe BMW 325i E30 and a roadster Honda CRX VTI Del Sol. BMW has raw power and it's very performance orientated but the Honda looks so fine and with the top down in the summer it's such a great drive.:)

I'd take the roadster Pagani Zonda F. Oh and it looks so beautiful. CF showing and great color coding. This car has so much character. The coupe was my favorite car but not the roadster just took that spot.
 
I'll take one of each.

Who do I have to kill, and how many times?!

Seriously though...Who? Cause i'll do it...
 
I'd take the coupe, no question there. If I wanted the wind to blow through my hair, I'd just roll the windows down.
 
On the Pagani main site there's a Zonda F coupe with the same 'paint' job :drool:.
 
It's official. That car is teh sex. I really have a weak spot for convertible supercars. They look so utterly awsome without a roof.
 
I never thought Pagani's cars were something special (visually), but this Roadster looks beautiful! And this colour scheme is killer. 👍
 
Which one performs better? I'd take the convertible because they look pretty much the same, aero-wise. That is the baddest convertible I've ever seen.
 
I'd take the coupe, I'd have no use for a convertible here.

On an aside note, the coupe will perform better, it's better aerodynamically, and more structurally rigid. No matter how close they've come with the roadster, it won't quite match the coupe.
 
I'd take either. LMPs don't need a roof, why do I? (errh... seriously?). Pagani's design gives the convertible almost as much structural rigidity as the coupe, with very little difference in weight.

I prefer the cocooned feel of a coupe, but a convertible would be radical. Plus, you don't hit your helmet on the roof everytime you turn your head.... that's if they allow you at the track without the roof.
 
GTRacer4
The weave :drool:

Coupe, with no paint, just the CF showing...
You must admit the weave method they used with the Zonda F is top notch work. But I like the coupe version more.
 
I'll take the convertible fanks! I'd want that engine to assault my ear drums and leave them wanting more!
 
Roo
If you have to ask, you can't afford it :)

I'd rather have the F as a coupe, but the convertible version of the C12S.

Damn. Im gonna buy one in 10 years as long as its not limited production.
 
the roadster, extremly marginaly though, because the F is my favorite supercar ever. ill take 8, and i agree with srv2low4me, i would kill anyone (except, maybe, family) for one
 
i'll take the convertible, if you look were i posted about the CLK DTM AMG you'll find out why!

Also i love that cr because of the carbon fibre, i wonder pagani take checks?

lol
 
Unusually for me I'd have the roadster. All the better to hear the engine. Not that the coupe is quiet.

If you like carbon fibre here's a Dauer EB110 in bare carbon at Goodwood FOS last year





Close ups



 
Back