“Ford didn’t start mass production”

  • Thread starter Thread starter Pebb
  • 11 comments
  • 1,107 views
Messages
16,737
England
Southampton, UK
Messages
Pebb--
Messages
Pebb
Source: AutoCar

Contrary to what we’ve been told, Henry Ford wasn’t the father of modern mass car production, according to two researchers from Cardiff University.

A new paper by Dr Paul Nieuwenhuis and Dr Pete Wells of the Centre for Automotive Industry Research at Cardiff Business School, suggests that the little-known Edward G Budd of Philadelphia was responsible for the development of the pressed steel car body and mass production.

Ford did develop mass production of key mechanical components and sub assemblies, as well as the moving assembly line. But Ford’s cars were built around a wooden framework clad with steel, aluminium or plywood, then painted. The paint could take days to dry, and attempts to speed this up often ended in fire.

The answer was to remove wood from the bodies, and by 1914 Budd held a number of patents for a pressed steel car body. Dodge Brothers trialled the technology, though the next major step - using the body to replace the chassis and carry all the mechanical components - was jointly developed by Budd with Citroen in 1934.

Nieuwenhuis and Wells argue that the history of the origins of mass car production was largely written in the 1930s, at a time when Budd's innovations were still embryonic. Historical accounts, they say, have drawn heavily on Ford's own perspective and his focus on assembly line labour, while Budd's input has remained hidden from view.

"Edward Budd was a true innovator. Without him, today's highly automated mass production of cars would not be possible,”
said Nieuwenhuis. “Also, the introduction of the all-steel body resulted in cars which were stiffer, safer, stronger, more durable and easier to paint and repair."
 
“Also, the introduction of the all-steel body resulted in cars which were stiffer, safer, stronger, more durable and easier to paint and repair."

Wow. Easier to paint. Without the Daimler and Benz dudes we wouldn't have cars at all, and without Ford it would take years to build a modern car. Of course, if it weren't for Budd we might have to let the car sit for a day or two while the paint dried.
 
Actually, it has been known for a long time that Ford didn't start mass production. Ransom Eli Olds beat Ford by 7 years.
 
..and we all know that in order to attribute a certain invention or breakthrough to a person that that person has to be a nice guy.

well duh! ;)

Hitler wasn't a nice guy and he invented a lot of things, look where that got him.
 
..and we all know that in order to attribute a certain invention or breakthrough to a person that that person has to be a nice guy.

The Beetle was originally the idea of Hitler - and oh! Ford happened to be a source Hitler's inspiration and antisemitic feelings! Interesting fact, no? :p
 
What is interesting to me is that a buisness school's center for autmotive research was assigned to do what amounts to historical research.
If this was about crash test results or sales numbers I would understand but in my opinion this seems like more of a historical study than anything else.
(not saying the buisness school can't do research, just saying the history school might be better at researching tech innovations from nearly 100 years ago)
 

Latest Posts

Back