1700BHP Corvette C5!

  • Thread starter Thread starter ViperUK
  • 42 comments
  • 1,986 views
i like a car for what they are, not for where they were made, thats racism
 
hiya! :D :O :lol:

AznDrifter...in my opinion and others I get from around where I live, your kind of ATTITUDE is the reason why this "Domestic vs Imports" kind of endless argument happen. Its how most people who are being accused as "ricers" is always doing. I dont mean its just Imports, but also Domestics too. But its just so common how its always being targeted toward people driving the Japanese cars such as hondas because of the stereotype that is being displayed toward audiences that watches you.
 
okay americans like all cars whether they say/show it or not. All those rich white bastards with their vettes would prolly take a 1000hp supra anytime.

I'm gonna bring the topic alive again.

I was bored one day and started think about a 540cu. in. bb in a nova with blower and dual 1250cfm carbs and some other stuff after checking if everything was working properly and it was all compatible i realized i built, on paper, a top fuel dragster making over 3100hp!!!!
 
Just a slight update: I sent the owner an email a while ago, but no reply. I asked all important questions like turbo lag, impressions he has got from driving on the street, what the car is like to drive, cars he has killed, and I asked if he has a dynoslip/timeslip.

I was also told by someone close to the company that the car was featured in a magazine, can't remember the name though. Damn! :grumpy:
 
F-Body
They keep selling them because idiots in this country don't like to be American and buy American. THe NSX and on a lesser note the S2000 are in a diff. class than most Honda's. If you want a performance car you don't buy a front wheel drive car, period. Look at the two best and fastest car racing, Formula 1 and Nascar. Both rear wheel drive. SO when I see someone saying that any front wheel drive car is a fast race car, I say they are a peppy economy car.
Click to expand...
Look, moron, I understand that NASCAR is by far the best racing series on the planer, especially since Brian France of late has proven that he can listen to the fans (green-white-checkers! Yes! :)) but stock cars, nvm the makes since they're essentially identical, are ancient, four-speed cars that have less technology than a pre-EFI Chevy Silverado. Where do u get these ideas, you're clueless, people said I'm the typical american stereotypo? I may slip up a bit, but you should find the nearest bathroom, walk up to the sink, look in the mirror and take a good long stare at an idiot. Maybe then you'll learn to think before you post. I checked all of your posts and they're as rediculous as L1ama, CX and CB's posts. at least when I say/do something stupid I admit it, apologize and move on. Hell even though I'd take a B4C (V6 appearance with SS power) Camaro over an M5 anyday (gearman cars cost too much to own, I heard if you use the wrong oil and blow your motor it isn't warranted, my neighbor has a '98 or so MB diesel wagon and he's put over $5000 into the motor :lol:) I understand the basic fact that muscle cars and sports cars are cars on two different levels of performance. Do you just stare at the HP ratings and say, 'hey, this car's better!'? Learn more about cars, I know quite a bit but trip up sometimes to the real gurus hear, but you're clueless.

Oh, and if you want the fastest, that would be IRL, with speeds averaging well over 210 at the 1.5 mile ovals.
 
Back