2004 Toyota Prius: (One of the) Best Car(s) of 2004?

  • Thread starter Thread starter JohnBM01
  • 69 comments
  • 2,631 views
In the US, I do believe you get a tax break if you own a hybrid/electric car.

I'm not sure exactly what the tax break is, but it's not going to be 8 grand.

There is no way that the ozone layer is going to be completely destroyed within the next 10 years. All new cars have low emissions, anyway.

It would be better to discover a way to replenish the ozone. It shouldn't be that difficult. I bet Al Gore could do it. He created the Internet. He can do anything. Except become president.
 
Originally posted by Klostrophobic
I'm not sure exactly what the tax break is, but it's not going to be 8 grand.
It's $3,000. And some manufacturers roll that into the price of the car....I'm not sure if that's how the Prius is priced.
 
Originally posted by milefile
I have boundless respect for M5. He is a car genius. He knows more about cars than all of you combined. Every single detail he states about cars is factual and correct. Deal with it. The next time I buy a car I will consult with M5 first, and anyone who knows him and doesn't is a complete ****ing idiot. You're all just a bunch of punks who can't stand to see someone who knows more than you about cars. Furthermore, M5 has an understanding of what people want and are willing to pay for, which when it comes to cars is the most important thing. Looking at pictures of attractive cars on a website and actually buying one, or expecting anyone else to buy one, are two totally different things.

But by all means, keep trying to cut him down. Futility is entertaining in an ironic way.

Buncha ****nuts. :lol:


Sorry, milefile. It is entirely possible to disagree with M5Power about cars and not be a complete ****ing idiot. I do it with fair regularity.

HOWEVER,

Originally posted by Takumi Fujiwara
Don't listen to M5. He's a thickheaded moron who seems not to mind paying 50 bucks to fill his tank up three times a week.

Originally posted by Fenrir51
M5 is more of a car jerk.


If and when I do disagree with him, I don't feel the need to insult him. That's plain f'ed up. I've never seen Doug turn a car disagreement into a personal attack. He has more class than that. You people need to grow the hell up.


M
 
I can say if you want something with good mileage and some halfway decent performace. Get the Jetta or Golf in deisle power. There great cars and they start around 17g's I believe.

At least they look good and have some class to em. I'd take a VDub over a Toyota anyday.
 
Originally posted by The359
Now see, that is exactly the attitude M5 takes on. If YOU don't think that a car is worth anything, then everyone else who goes out and buys that car is an idiot and doesn't know what they are doing when it comes to car buying, is that what you're trying to say? YOUR ideal car is not the same as EVERYONE ELSE'S ideal car.


It's an arguable point sometimes, but NOT this time. This time I can prove my statement beyond any reasonable argument. I realise you've never given me a fair shake on this board, so I couldn't care less how you feel on this issue. You don't understand that when I say "x car is bad", I've compared it to every member of its class and come up with that result. I've driven almost every single vehicle on the market and I don't comment on those I haven't. It's simple, actually.

Takumi doesn't agree with me on this issue. I don't care if he gets personal, because he feels that I've gotten personal by insulting his car. I have nothing but respect for Prius owners. It's a horrible value - the worst. But it's not a horrible buy. The reason magazines eat the Prius up is because they're not paying the bill. For those that are paying the bill, it's a brave choice. Of course, Civic Hybrid owners make the same choice and not in the same 'look at me, I'm saving the planet' way, but at least they've all got the same goal.

Them and Nader.

In your opinion. Just like my opinion could be that your the single worst person on this bored in its history ever.

Kids on board... kids not bored.

The following comparison will not change The359's mind, nor will it change Takumi's. The359's purpose at GTP is to argue with me, and Takumi thinks the Prius is a godsend. I don't care. Hopefully, it will help some people will understand where I'm coming from when I call the Prius the worst value. It's not my opinion, it's simple statistics. So here goes:

The 2004 Toyota Corolla LE equipped with optional side airbags, anti-lock brakes, and cruise control starts at $16065. The 2004 Toyota Prius without options starts at $20510. On features, the vehicles share air-conditioning, power steering, a tilt steering wheel, cloth upholstery, power mirrors, an AM/FM/CD player, a digital clock, an outside-temperature indicator, variable-intermittent wipers, a rear defogger, power windows, power locks, remote keyless entry, anti-lock brakes, cruise control, and an emergency trunk release. The Prius's unique features are traction aid, a steering wheel with radio controls, heated mirrors, a rear spoiler, and alloy wheels. The Corolla's unique features are daytime running lights, an interior air filter, a tachometer, a remote fuel door release, a remote trunk release, a height-adjustable driver seat, map lights, and front side airbags. The Corolla, then, has more features for less money, though you're not going to see me claim that a tachometer, a rear spoiler, or daytime running lights matter. But still, it's more for less and in a side-by-side comparison I'm not about to pass that up.

Power next. The Prius has 76bhp from a 1.5L four-cylinder; the Corolla has 130bhp from a 1.8L four-cylinder. Prius fans yell and scream at this statistic since the Prius's electric motor has 67bhp, for a grand total of 143bhp, thirteen more than the Corolla. Cool, I don't care. The Corolla does 0-60 in 9.4 seconds; the Prius does it in 10.5. I'll thirteen your horsepower, the Corolla - regardless of transmission - is faster by about a second. Maybe it has something to do with the Prius's being 388lbs heavier.

Size. The Prius and Corolla have strangely the exact same front and rear head room dimensions, but the Prius is larger in leg room, by 0.6" in the front and 3.2" in the rear. The Prius's cargo area is also 2.5cu ft larger than the Corolla's. If they weren't made by the same company, all this may be a bit embarassing for the Corolla since it's about three inches longer overall. But then again, the Prius is two years newer and has a very different body design.

Cost! Cost is big, right? Prius fans go on and on about how they're saving the Earth and money. No, they aren't.

Gas in New York County - that's where I live, for those of you keeping score - is $1.63 per gallon. Assuming you drive 11,000 miles per year, the Prius, at 57.5mpg, uses 191.3043 gallons per year, while the Corolla, at 36.0mpg, uses 305.5556 gallons per year. That means the cost of gasoline per year for the Prius is an astonishingly low $311.83. I'll concede that to the Prius - it's really damn cheap to run. The Corolla's per-year gasoline cost is a decent $498.06. With an initial cost difference of $4445, it will take the Prius until November 2027 - or, 23 years and 8 months - to become a better dollar value than the Corolla. In fact, that won't happen until you've spent a full $27800 on the vehicle and gasoline. Let's think on that for a second. 23 years, 8 months ago was July 1980; during Jimmy Carter's term (since then, we've had two Reagans, two Bushes, two Clintons, and about six Corollas). It's pre-Takumi, even. And ask yourself: how many 1981 Chevrolet Chevettes do you see driving around these days?

For cost, I'm leaving out depreciation, where the Corolla fares about two percent better than the Prius, though it's an unfair statistic because a) the old Prius was even worse than the new Prius and b) Toyota redesigned the Prius prematurely, tanking resale. I'm also leaving out reliability-based running costs since I think any sensible person would consider the Corolla and Prius about on-par.

But there's another cost issue that can't be overlooked. Toyota has a hybrid battery pack in the Prius that will need replacement within ten to fifteen years of ownership (of course, it's only warrantied for 8yr/100,000mi). The estimated cost of that battery pack is $3000-$5300. With that cost figure, the Prius will not be a better value than the Corolla in our lifetimes. That said, technological advancements are going to bring that price down into the sub-$400 range by the time replacement is necessary, but it's still a major cost issue in a car whose one hold over competition is yearly running costs.

So by all means, buy a Prius. Call me up in 2027 - at least - and we'll talk about how you got 0.6 more inches of front leg room. And I'll slap you in the face (Oh no! A threat of violence!).

PS - if you've read all of this, get a damn life. I haven't even read all of it.

Edit: I'm not bringing up personal crap because it's unrelated (except The359 whose positions in life are defined by taking the opposite of my positions...)
 
There is no statistic for what an individual wants or needs. :rolleyes: You're assuming a person will only need a car to drive X amount of miles, you're assuming gas prices are X amount, you're assuming person wants X amount of things or cares about X amount of power. These are called VARIABLES. That means they are no set number, hence you cannot tell everyone that you have the answer to every variable they have.

Now, since you're telling us to get a life, well, gee, memorizing all those numbers and driving all those cars sure must take up a lot of your time...

And if you're not going to attempt to get personal....then don't get personal. :rolleyes: You went hypocritical not only in the post, but in the exact same sentence. Get a clue, man.

Oh, and by the way, what happened to not taking everything so seriously?

You are not an expert. Face it.
 
Originally posted by The359
There is no statistic for what an individual wants or needs. :rolleyes: You're assuming a person will only need a car to drive X amount of miles, you're assuming gas prices are X amount, you're assuming person wants X amount of things or cares about X amount of power. These are called VARIABLES. That means they are no set number, hence you cannot tell everyone that you have the answer to every variable they have.

Now, since you're telling us to get a life, well, gee, memorizing all those numbers and driving all those cars sure must take up a lot of your time...

And if you're not going to attempt to get personal....then don't get personal. :rolleyes: You went hypocritical not only in the post, but in the exact same sentence. Get a clue, man.

Oh, and by the way, what happened to not taking everything so seriously?

You are not an expert. Face it.
M5 made good points in my opinion. If we are going to sit here and bench test all these cars, what are we gonna do it with besides numbers? And furthermore, if we are going to discuss cars merits in general, the we have to make some generalizations about the drivers/buyers. Perhaps a Chevy S-10 is what someone WANTS, but I dont think anyone would nominate it for one of the best trucks of the year.
 
Originally posted by M5Power
It's a horrible value - the worst

Except to many people it's a better value than the Corolla, as different people value different things in cars. If you are looking for acceleration then the Corolla is a better buy, but if you are looking for fuel mileage the Prius is better. For people who buy a car like the Prius, it's not just about saving money on gas, it's about buying a car that is better for the environment, and obviously they put a pretty high value on that if they are willing to pay the extra for a Prius.

I think some of you guys need to chill out with the in your opinion stuff too. If M5 types something, it is pretty clear that it is his opinion, I don't think he or anyone else really needs to specify whos opinion it is :p
 
Originally posted by Rumple Foreskin
It is atleast $8000 more than its competitors. Yeah it is fuel efficent, but in order for you to make up that $8000 you would have to drive atleast 10 years I bet to save that in fuel.

It is a waste of money.

This of course is the case in the US. Fuel is dirt cheap.
I don't blame M5 for saying the Prius is bad value, but its not a bad car.

Take the Prius in the UK or most european countries where fuels is:banghead: expensive, and the extra cost can be recouped.
 
I think one thing is being missed in this discussion...that besides the obvious measures of fun such as 0-60, hp, etc. there are other ways in which a car can be fun to drive. Driving for maximum fuel economy can be fun, too. Grabbing the highest gear possible (well..not in the Prius) looking for downhill ways to get somwhere, coasting through green lights, etc. From what I have read the Prius has a decent suspension, so these kind of shenanigains can be pulled off in it. Thats fun too, so although the 10.whatever sec 0-60 may seem sluggish, there are ways that the enthusiast can have fun with hybrid cars too.
 
Im gonna have to go with M5 on this one. Not only because he's been helpful ot me in the past, but because a lot of what he said had truth behind it. Also, 36000 CDN is way too much to pay for fuel economy. I'd much rather go out and buy a hyundai accent for 13000, which in my opinion is a better bargain and a better looking vehicle.
 
If bad value equalled a bad car, the worst car on earth would be the Ferrari Enzo. $650,000 for a car that performs less than twice as well as, oh, say, a Corvette, despite costing 13 times as much.

Value isn't everything.
 
I think the Toyota Prius is pretty cool, even though I started this topic for you to comment. Anyhow, I agree with Gran Turismo 2. The Prius MIGHT be the future. If it isn't in terms of style, then definitely in low emissions.

Similarily, when I heard of the Prius and the Echo in the Houston Auto Show back in, maybe 1999. The Echo was told to have a quiet engine and actually EAT pollution. But its styling is ugly, cheap ass, that sort of thing. I liked the Prius better. I kind of think that here in Houston, I think the Prius is underrated as I have seen more Echos than Priuses. I like the car to be honest. The 2nd Gen Prius is even better looking. Good one, Toyota.
 
Originally posted by JohnBM01
The Echo was told to have a quiet engine and actually EAT pollution.
Do you mean that the air comes out the tailpipe cleaner than when it entered the air filter? I find that hard to believe. Please elaborate.
 
http://www.edmunds.com/new/2004/toy...eview.html?tid=edmunds.h..reviews.reviews.1.*

That site is for the 2004 Toyota Prius.

To be honest, I been a car fan since 1998 or 1999, and I am obviously uneducated about the Echo. I thought the Echo/Vitz/Yaris was mostly a low-emissions car that had as much "green" as the Prius. I don't think the Echo was seen as an environment-frinedly car even though it has good MPG ratings.
 
Oh, and by the way, what happened to not taking everything so seriously?

You are not an expert. Face it.

More personal stuff. Blah blah blah. Like I said, the comparison won't change your mind because you're so personal that no matter what I say you won't agree with it. 👍

If M5 types something, it is pretty clear that it is his opinion, I don't think he or anyone else really needs to specify whos opinion it is

Finally. Everybody's saying that I pass off my opinion as fact. If that's true, then that's the way YOU'RE READING IT. Anything I type is my view. It's not your view, it's not the GTP staff's view, and it's NOT fact. It should[/b] be obvious.

I'm done with off-topic in this thread.
 
If you're telling people your opinion, then how can you tell people that they are completely wrong with their opinion?
 
Originally posted by The359
If you're telling people your opinion, then how can you tell people that they are completely wrong with their opinion?
Because that is also his opinion. Like duh.

All of you suck. That's a fact.
 
Originally posted by Rumple Foreskin
All of you suck. That's a fact.

Nope opinion ;) Just Playing... im not going to get involve in this war.

Anyways I feel that the Prius is just not me. I dont consider it the "best" of 2004 or the "worst" of 2004. Does get great milage though. Not everybody cares about how much mile they get to the gallon, such as people who buy SRT10 :lol:
 
For people who buy a car like the Prius, it's not just about saving money on gas, it's about buying a car that is better for the environment, and obviously they put a pretty high value on that if they are willing to pay the extra for a Prius.

Thank you! Finally, someone comes 'round with the obvious argument.

You're right, obviously. Any sensible person wouldn't buy a Prius without some sort of incentive, and the incentive is 20mpg more than the Corolla. The kind of people buying the Prius don't tend to care about the dollar value statistic when, in the end, they're doing more to save the planet even if it means they pay a lot more.

But that's not to say the Corolla isn't cheap to run. The top ten most popular cars and their fuel economy ratings are:
- Ford F150 (17.0mpg)
- Chevrolet Silverado (17.1mpg)
- Ford Explorer (17.5mpg)
- Honda Accord (27.4mpg)
- Toyota Camry (25.9mpg)
- Ford Taurus (23.0mpg)
- Dodge Ram (16.9mpg)
- Honda Civic (36.5mpg)
- Ford Ranger (21.8mpg)
- Ford Focus (27.0mpg)

The average fuel economy there is 23.01mpg. The most recent figure I've heard for the end of oil on Earth is 70 years. So, assuming they're directly proportional, which they aren't, if everyone drove a 36mpg Corolla, we'd have 109.4 years rather than 70. Yes, if everyone drove a Prius we'd get an extra 174.5 years out of the planet, but hey - we'll all be dead by then anyway.

If bad value equalled a bad car, the worst car on earth would be the Ferrari Enzo. $650,000 for a car that performs less than twice as well as, oh, say, a Corvette, despite costing 13 times as much.

Value isn't everything.

But you've used the worst possible example to back up your point. People willing to pay $650,000 for a car don't care about value, period. In fact, there's an exact number at which value no longer is a concern, but I don't care to find it.
 
If I ever bought a Prius (I won't), it'd only be for novelty purposes, and because I'm a dork. While Doug knows that we disagree on some views on cars, there's no denying that the Prius doesn't deliver any compelling reasons to justify its premium price tag, unless you like novelty things or are a dork.
 
90% of the people who buy Priuses don't care about value either. They do it because having a car that is "green" appeals to their morality, or makes a statement , or takes a jab at the oil companies, or whatever.

Hell, look at how many celebrities are driving Priuses now! It's gotten to the point where, if you go to an exclusive restaurant, they park the Priuses out front where the Ferraris and Lambos once were. My mom took her Prius to one such place just the other day, and was told by the valet that the valet already knew how to operate it, as Leo DiCaprio had been in with his just the other day!

Besides, despite all he's said, M5 has not at all offerred any compelling reason why the Prius is a bad car. All he's been able to probe is that it's not the best value in it's class.
 
Originally posted by Takumi Fujiwara

Besides, despite all he's said, M5 has not at all offerred any compelling reason why the Prius is a bad car. All he's been able to probe is that it's not the best value in it's class.

Um...

That... would... be a reason... in fact....

:odd:

But anyway, we've got snow right now, forecasted snow tomorrow, and forecasted snow Friday here. Doesn't snow kick ass?!
 
Originally posted by M5Power
But anyway, we've got snow right now, forecasted snow tomorrow, and forecasted snow Friday here. Doesn't snow kick ass?!
Oh yes it does (I'm in Boston). :rolleyes:

On that note, I bet Priuses suck in the snow. Efficient engine = less heat = no defogging. Or does it have an electric heater? And those nonlinear, regenerative brakes and a torqey electric motor must equal lots of undesired slides.
 
On a barely related note, Honda really needs to make a CRX Si, an Insight with the 200hp RSX engine and six speed transmission, rather than all this hybrid stuff.

edit: I seriously doubt the Prius has any problems running a heater :p
 
It does have an electric heater of some sort. It has to, as the engine is off during a large percentage of the car's use.
 
Originally posted by Takumi Fujiwara
Hell, look at how many celebrities are driving Priuses now! It's gotten to the point where, if you go to an exclusive restaurant, they park the Priuses out front where the Ferraris and Lambos once were. My mom took her Prius to one such place just the other day, and was told by the valet that the valet already knew how to operate it, as Leo DiCaprio had been in with his just the other day!
That's quite possibly the most compelling reason against even remotely considering a Prius that you could possibly offer me.

Boy, just what I need to bolster my sagging self-esteem: to be seen driving the same self-righteous, earthy-crunchy midget Aztek that Demi drives...
 
Just found this on the Prius heater:

"This system includes an electric water pump that circulates warm coolant for the heater, allowing the Prius to blow warm air when the gas engine isn't running."

So it's got a standard heater, but the water pump can run even when the gas engine is off.

(From http://www.elepent.com/review.php?nr=85 )
 
Maybe oneday cars with internal combustion engine w/ 100+ HP 'd be announced illegal. :D
 
Back