-> For those who are wondering about the '11 Durango interior pics, here it is:
![]()
![]()
Errr....Right, R/T is Dodge's performance designation. I personally think its almost laughable that they'd bother putting it on this presumably body-on-frame truck. What's next, a Tahoe SS? A Shelby Expedition GT500? There's a reason Dodge's competition quit on the "sports" SUVs idea, as Joey already outlined.
That's all speculation on the part of the website. This could be a sticker and tire package for the regular Durango. And it might not even be that much. It could even simply be the name of the trim level that gets the V8 engine, like it is on the Charger.It appears it will be more then just a tow rig, Dodge designed this to be sporty and its a market that no longer exists.
You lost me when you started comparing the Dodge Durango to the Toyota Rav4, which up until a few years ago was based on the Corolla platform. Seriously.But the Durango's competition, stuff like the Explorer, Expedition, Traverse, Arcadia, Pilot, RAV4, stuff like that, don't have performance versions because nobody wants performance versions. Maybe they're exploring a niche of HEMI-powered hardass soccer dads or something.
It looks nice and aggressive, why did they put the R/T designation ? It's kinda like BMW putting the M badge on X5 & X6.
*Highlander. Sorry, I can't be bothered keeping my boring Toyotas straight.That's all speculation on the part of the website. This could be a sticker and tire package for the regular Durango. And it might not even be that much. It could even simply be the name of the trim level that gets the V8 engine, like it is on the Charger.
You lost me when you started comparing the Dodge Durango to the Toyota Rav4, which up until a few years ago was based on the Corolla platform. Seriously.
We don't know what this will have in it for tuning, and based on specs we know it looks like it will be targeted at the Toyota Sequioa 5.7, Nissan Armada and Chevrolet Tahoe. Perhaps a dying market segment, sure, but not one that is actually dead..
*Highlander. Sorry, I can't be bothered keeping my boring Toyotas straight.
Why on earth are they sending a unibody crossover like this to compete with actual trucks? Don't forget the Expedition, btw. All body-on-frame trucks that actually have balls for towing and hauling and whatnot.
I don't disagree with that, but giving an SUV a bigger engine and a tuned suspension setup with bigger brakes, all with a much bigger price tag isn't really what the market is after. Make the thing look sporty for sure though.
The explorer (also its competition) is also unibody.
Are you forgetting about towing capability?
Forgive me if I don't quite understand what you're saying but things like a bigger engine, brakes, and suspension aren't necessarily included for the sporty aspect of trucks and subs since they can also benefit the utilitarian side of things.
I'm not denying it makes the car sportier. Yes it'll be more sporty than lesser trim levels, but it's not strictly a performance trim anymore.
Again you are giving too much credit to the sportiness of the R/T trim. There are people that want a more sporty ride/handling mated to a powerful engine, and most are willing to pay for it. It's hardly lost efforts considering the R/T will not be the volume seller of the Durango line and it'll probably have the highest profit margin of all the trims.
Again, we don't know what constitutes "sporty" in this context, and there are several other manufacturers with similar vehicles on paper in their lineups.Right. My point is that the Durango R/T is going to be the performance version of the basic, standard Durango. It's being built for a market other manufactures alreay left, there is no need for it. Have a upgraded model for sure but tying to make is sporty is just lost efforts.
Yes, because R/T = sporty in the consumer's eye.
It looks nice and aggressive, why did they put the R/T designation ? It's kinda like BMW putting the M badge on X5 & X6.
And speaking of a chevy Tahoe SS, GM actually made one. I don't know if it was just a concept though.
![]()
No it isn't. The Silverado was restyled in 2003, but the Tahoe/Suburban were not.Also, that is the generation of the gm full-size before they released the silverado ss.