- 41,187
Ram.Thing is, Chrysler still does a bad job no matter what it is.
Ram.Thing is, Chrysler still does a bad job no matter what it is.
Well... compared to other Dodge models, it is a luxury vehicle. If you're buying an $80,000 car, you want an $80,000 interior. The ACR is your balls-out sports car.
I have to disagree. The only other truck on the market that has as nice of a feeling interior as the Dodge is the F-150.The new Ram may have a nice looking interior (I guess) the feel isn't 100% good yet. More like 85%.
If they are not, i mean come on, its 2011 and still using bulbs?
LED headlights, taillights, whatever have no real purpose other than looking pretty.
A single bulb vs 20-50 LEDs that each cost around half of that one bulb... Hmm.
Nah, nah, I'll keep traditional bulbs thanks.
They're still more expensive to replace than bulbs, more expensive to manufacture, etc.
And the last thing Chrysler needs right now is pointless spending on every vehicle they make that doesn't involve quality control on the interior.
That... makes no sense. Since when is the Wrangler a bad vehicle? It has been one of the few Chrysler products that has sold fairly well, and is actually a pretty good vehicle, especially off road.The 2009 Wrangler is suppose to be the worst car of 2009.
I'd rather have a Wrangler than the utterly awful Toyota equivalent.The 2009 Wrangler is suppose to be the worst car of 2009.
Hello There, IR TEH SRT-8
![]()
Jalopnik has the story here
- Will be a 2012 model
- Will use the new 6.4L HEMI V8
- Somewhere between 505-525 BHP
- Still uses AWD
Nice? It seems like these things would be passe by now...
That scares me...Hello There, IR TEH SRT-8
![]()
Jalopnik has the story here
- Will be a 2012 model
- Will use the new 6.4L HEMI V8
- Somewhere between 505-525 BHP
- Still uses AWD
Nice? It seems like these things would be passe by now...
I'm still baffled why Chrysler thinks that the only way to get more power from an engine is just to make it bigger. The SRT-8 now has a 6.1L putting out something like 420-430hp. Why on earth did they feel they needed to increase the displacement to get more power out of it? People in the aftermarket have tuned their 6.1L up quite a bit and I'm guessing they are getting more than 500hp out of them. It's this lack of ingenuity and engineering that make me dislike American vehicles.
I may be wrong, but I suspect there's a bit of an 'if it's not big, it aint good enough' attitude with a fair proportion of American buyers. The kind of people that see the Mini as a chick's car, probably. And so keeping the existing 6.1 (or god forbid, downsizing it) wouldn't be seen as a big enough 'improvement', presumably, even regardless of power output. I dunno, that's just a guess.
Chrysler nearly has as much power out of the 5.7 as they do out of the 6.1, so I doubt its lack of ability. 100 horsepower from only a .3 bump in displacement isn't anything to scoff at, and 525 horespower from a 6.4L engine is hardly bad anyways.I'm still baffled why Chrysler thinks that the only way to get more power from an engine is just to make it bigger. The SRT-8 now has a 6.1L putting out something like 420-430hp.
I know you don't like American cars, but if you are going to claim that they lack ingenuity and engineering prowess, try to at least pick a valid reason. Thanks.It's this lack of ingenuity and engineering that make me dislike American vehicles.
Also I'm not exactly thrilled this is what my tax dollars are producing. I was kind of hoping Chrysler would drop their SRT line after the government backed a truck load of money up to them. Chrysler needs to make cars people can buy, not cars people think are cool.
Also I'm not exactly thrilled this is what my tax dollars are producing. I was kind of hoping Chrysler would drop their SRT line after the government backed a truck load of money up to them. Chrysler needs to make cars people can buy, not cars people think are cool.