- 9,401
- Western Sydney
- mustafur
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/118945
The sooner the better, time for F1 to regain some dignity back.
The sooner the better, time for F1 to regain some dignity back.
The current situation is not Pirelli's fault though. They were told by the FIA what to produce, and have done that quite well (whether you agree with the premise or not).http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/118945
The sooner the better, time for F1 to regain some dignity back.
I know it's not fully Pirelli's fault but partly due to the fact they where happy to go ahead with the silly regulations.The current situation is not Pirelli's fault though. They were told by the FIA what to produce, and have done that quite well (whether you agree with the premise or not).
The promising part of that article is the conditions that Michelin would impose on being the supplier, not the sole fact that the tyre supplier would change. I'm sure that Pirelli could do the same thing give the opportunity.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/118945
The sooner the better, time for F1 to regain some dignity back.
tbh, Barcelona is dull as dish water no mater what you do.Can you imagine the last race without DRS and much more durable tyres... I don't think the fans know what they want, if we went back to cars similar to the late 80s everyone would say they were too slow and if went back 10 years everyone would say they are too easy to drive.
They could brake very hard and didn't have to feather the throttle anything like they do now.tbh, Barcelona is dull as dish water no mater what you do.
10 years ago we had V10s, Im not sure your serious there.
But the cars were significantly more physical.They could brake very hard and didn't have to feather the throttle anything like they do now.
The F1 strategy group has decided that drivers are allowed to use just 4 engines per season.
It's certainly promising - promising misery. Michelin used to win the contracts to supply taxi companies with tyres because they made a product that was so durable it was practically bulletproof. Remember when Vettel did 52 laps of Monza on a single set of tyres? Or when Rosberg did it in Sochi last year? It was dull as dishwater. Now imagine what it would be like if everyone could do it in every race.The promising part of that article is the conditions that Michelin would impose on being the supplier, not the sole fact that the tyre supplier would change.
Have folk lost the ability to make new threads? This whole page has nothing to do with the Spanish Grand Prix
BBCFormula 1: Refuelling to return from 2017 season
BBCFormula 1 bosses have agreed to bring back refuelling in 2017
....................BBCBut it is the return of refuelling which will attract the most attention - the practice was last permitted in 2009
It's certainly promising - promising misery. Michelin used to win the contracts to supply taxi companies with tyres because they made a product that was so durable it was practically bulletproof. Remember when Vettel did 52 laps of Monza on a single set of tyres? Or when Rosberg did it in Sochi last year? It was dull as dishwater. Now imagine what it would be like if everyone could do it in every race.
The durability of the tyres is not the issue. There is always going to come a point where tyres wear out. It's this attitude that "the drivers can't push at 100% all the time, and that's bad" which is damaging because it fundamentally fails to understand that cars will always consume fuel and use up tyres. Fuel and tyre management have always been a part of motorsport.
Trundling down a pitlane at 60KPH is spectacle?
I just want a race from lights to flag with nothing at all getting in the way of it. No silly tyres, no unnecessary pitstops just a RACE.
Trundling down a pitlane at 60KPH is spectacle?
I just want a race from lights to flag with nothing at all getting in the way of it. No silly tyres, no unnecessary pitstops just a RACE.
louder sounds
You won't get a race. You'll get a procession. As long as wings exist, you need the gimmicks to make overtaking possible.
That's a pity. If there'e one thing I've learnt from Forumla E, it's that there's quite a lot of interesting noises to be heard when the race cars aren't SHOUTING ALL THE DAMN TIME.
Not in this way, the current tyres have a rapid wear rate that don't allow drivers to push anywhere near the limit as the life of the tyre is just going to go to nothing if they do, where as before it was about how you could look after the tyre when you're at the limit.It's certainly promising - promising misery. Michelin used to win the contracts to supply taxi companies with tyres because they made a product that was so durable it was practically bulletproof. Remember when Vettel did 52 laps of Monza on a single set of tyres? Or when Rosberg did it in Sochi last year? It was dull as dishwater. Now imagine what it would be like if everyone could do it in every race.
The durability of the tyres is not the issue. There is always going to come a point where tyres wear out. It's this attitude that "the drivers can't push at 100% all the time, and that's bad" which is damaging because it fundamentally fails to understand that cars will always consume fuel and use up tyres. Fuel and tyre management have always been a part of motorsport.
That's a pity. If there'e one thing I've learnt from Forumla E, it's that there's quite a lot of interesting noises to be heard when the race cars aren't SHOUTING ALL THE DAMN TIME.
Excellent decision, let's just hope they use better fuel rigs that don't get stuck or spill everywhere.This could go in a number of places but I thought here would be best for now.
http://m.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/118991/f1-revamp-plan-includes-refuelling