2016 North American International Auto Show | Jan 11-24

  • Thread starter Thread starter CodeRedR51
  • 99 comments
  • 7,688 views
MYKF1Qnh.jpg

a9MLSAYh.jpg

YdiBaKHh.jpg

XBNO6Jfh.jpg


I like it, more so from the front.
Also, I could see it as a Holden.
 
Barring that Accord-esque side window-thingy that's seemingly in everything non-crossover nowdays, I love it.
 
Put a Camaro V8 in it and then I'll like it. :P
 
Make it a new GNX GM, kthnx.
 
MYKF1Qnh.jpg

a9MLSAYh.jpg

YdiBaKHh.jpg

XBNO6Jfh.jpg


I like it, more so from the front.
Also, I could see it as a Holden.

Fat tesla or not, I find it sharp looking. The digital extras are OK, but am I seeing things or is that a glass roof?
 
The one render showing the rear does it make the Avista look fat. But in the flesh, the car is much better looking in proportions.

buick-avista-concept-live-rear-three-quarter-1.jpg


buick-avista-concept-live-rear-1.jpg


buick-avista-concept-live-rear-three-quarter-3.jpg
 
Add Port holes and just call it Riviera
 
Hmm...actually it is a bit better in a real photo isn't it? Not too bad. Still Tesla like though.
 
Add Port holes and just call it Riviera

Don't ruin it.

It looks fantastic. This is like Buick's RX-Vision; a thoroughly modern, gorgeous two-door. Suddenly, folks that aren't retired would be interested in a Buick car.
 
The one render showing the rear does it make the Avista look fat. But in the flesh, the car is much better looking in proportions.

buick-avista-concept-live-rear-three-quarter-1.jpg

I don't know why, but from this angle it gives a very Crossfire-y shape.

Much, Much better looking than the Crossfire's behind, though. Make it happen, Buick.
 
Don't ruin it.

It looks fantastic. This is like Buick's RX-Vision; a thoroughly modern, gorgeous two-door. Suddenly, folks that aren't retired would be interested in a Buick car.
Just replace the Side Vents with Portholes
 
Just replace the Side Vents with Portholes

Why, though? That's the same slave-to-history move that saw things like this happen:

upload_2016-1-10_23-40-0.png
 
Why, though? That's the same slave-to-history move that saw things like this happen:

View attachment 500335
I didnt say go Retro, i mean have some kind of Heritage signature design cues on the car.

It looks like a Jaguar F-Type
FT_014_035_UK_GALLERY-device_desktop-1366x769_tcm91-39495_desktop_1366x769.jpg
 
Last edited:
Pacifica name has been revived, and the plug-in hybrid gets 80MPGe

pacifica-hybrid-lead.jpg

003-chrysler-pacifica-1.jpg

005-chrysler-pacifica-1.jpg




Looks good lowered too

37Oh81J.jpg
 
Last edited:
Gotta say, that's actually not half bad.

Edit: This bit from the Autoblog article is truth.

There's something about two incredibly functional sliding doors that give people this idea that they've given up, and given in to family life. But if the van you see here had two fixed rear doors, and maybe an extra inch of ride height, it'd be gobbled up like mad as part of the growing crossover craze.
 
Last edited:
I just noticed how seamless the door track integration is.
 
I just noticed how seamless the door track integration is.
Chrysler Copyright since forever. Most Generations have had it that way.
 
That Fusion Interior is Horrible, but thats good. makes people turn to the MKZ.
 
The Buick has so many Opel design cues on it, I wouldn't be surprised to see it trotted out at Geneva as a Monza concept.
 
Back