92-93 integra gsr vs others

  • Thread starter Thread starter OoNismoO
  • 42 comments
  • 2,614 views
Ghost C
No.

92-93 Geo Storm GSi, or the Asuna Sunfire for Canadians.

The Integra GS-R might have 20 horsepower on it, but it also weighs around 200 pounds more. The Storm's suspension was also designed by a little company called Lotus, perhaps you've heard of them? The same suspension was used on the Lotus Elan M100 - The best handling front wheel drive car, ever.


the lotus elan m100 was well engineered.

but just cause the same poeple designed the suspension on the geo, doesnt make the geo better. a lot of it has to do with the type of suspension they use. the geo storm gsi usese struts all around, versus, double wishbones at all four corners for the elan, and the gsr. im sure the geo handles good, but i still think the gsr is a better platform for handling, but not better than the elan.
 
Goomba
A website that I sort of trust (www.car-videos.com) for getting rough ideas on quarter mile times, shows a 16. While I can see a very good driver get maybe a 15.7, I doubt it'll go down to a 15 flat. However, I didn't know this car was even a big contender, and it seems like a lot of people make it a nice little autocrosser.


they have the 03 acura cl type s doing a 14.6 sec quarter mile, at 97 mph, is that right?
 
RobcioPL
That must be a very bad driver. Go over the www.sr20forum.com That where you should get your facts straight. I just checked other times and they are redicously slow. 04 6 Speed Maxima 15.03? Um, ive seen automatics run 14.4-14.8
Altima 5 speed runs an 14.7? Auto's run better. i've seen manuals pull 14.1 to 14.4

But look at this thread. I don't see anything in the 15s that is bone stock.

There may be some factory freaks that are running those sort of times, but I seriously doubt if you put an average driver in one of these cars, they would grab as low of numbers as your saying.

From what I've heard, roughly 100 lbs makes a tenth of a second difference in times. While I would bet the Altimas have the same or even higher trap speeds, I doubt their times are beating WRXs. Although, I may be biased a bit. :D

As far as times Nismo, for the Acura, that sounds about right, but I'm not totally sure. I know it gives a pretty fair record on the WRX and UDSM STi, but those are the only cars I really know quarter-mile times for. Most WRXs are grabbing 14.3 to 14.5s.
 
My bro has a stock 02 Maxima 6 Speed, he smoked his friends WRX from the lights. Believe it or not the Maxima is fast. Race from a roll? WRX should be way behind. Not to mention his WRX was lightly modded. Intake, Exhuast, and something else just cant remember.
Now he is around 300awhp! Its a nice little car. It was recently at World of Wheels show in Chicago. He recieved 3rd place. Oh, if you want to know its an 04.
 
M5Power
:lol: This may be the most absurd post I've read! Not only do you advocate a Nissan forum as a legitimate source for quarter-mile times for Nissans, you then claim the 2004 Maxima automatic is doing the quarter in 14.4! The automatic has one less speed than the manual, meaning you're endorsing a 13.9-sec or less quarter mile for the manual - a 3432-pound car that has 265 horsepower. And you outright stated a manual Altima will do it in 14.1! I work for the company and I'm not even this biased. Get your facts straight and come back here.
Absurd? Your absurd. What company do you work for? No stock maxima has hit a 13.9. The fastest maxima N/A is 12.8.
Your telling me a 02-0? Maxima cant pull low 14's?
 
RobcioPL
My bro has a stock 02 Maxima 6 Speed, he smoked his friends WRX from the lights. Believe it or not the Maxima is fast. Race from a roll? WRX should be way behind. Not to mention his WRX was lightly modded. Intake, Exhuast, and something else just cant remember.
Now he is around 300awhp! Its a nice little car. It was recently at World of Wheels show in Chicago. He recieved 3rd place. Oh, if you want to know its an 04.

Then the WRX driver is stupid. A manual WRX vs. a manual 00-03 Maxima should be no question WRX. It actually shouldn't really be a contest. I think neither car was stock.

Absurd? Your absurd. What company do you work for? No stock maxima has hit a 13.9. The fastest maxima N/A is 12.8.
Your telling me a 02-0? Maxima cant pull low 14's?

"Your" the absurd one. I'm telling you than an 00-03 Maxima can't even "pull" mid 14s stock with either transmission. A manual isn't cracking 14.8 and an automatic isn't going to beat 15.3. The Maxima is my favorite used car, but sorry - there's no point lying to boost its already great performance.
 
RobcioPL
My bro has a stock 02 Maxima 6 Speed, he smoked his friends WRX from the lights. Believe it or not the Maxima is fast. Race from a roll? WRX should be way behind. Not to mention his WRX was lightly modded. Intake, Exhuast, and something else just cant remember.
Now he is around 300awhp! Its a nice little car. It was recently at World of Wheels show in Chicago. He recieved 3rd place. Oh, if you want to know its an 04.

If the guy has an intake on his close to stock WRX, its raises a few eyebrows. I've never seen anyone, ever suggest an intake, untill you've switched to a nice big beefy turbo. Intakes typically cause CELs to go and odd timing. Also, the gains from the intake are next to nothing. Some people actually dynoed with less or the same HP/TQ numbers.

How far back did the WRX's exhaust go back? If he has a full turboback, hes probably at 190awhp. With an up-pipe, hes at 200awhp, with a much quicker spooling turbo. If it was just a cat-back, then he probably didn't gain anything.

Also, I just don't see how a 255hp, 3225lb Maxima would win against a WRX from light to light, unless the WRX isn't launching. I would guess the Maxima starts to pull as much as the WRX in 3rd, then 4th belongs to the Maxima, which explain a higher trap speed in the quarter mile. However these sites:

http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/roadtests/0212scc_roadtest/
http://www.car-videos.com/performance/view.asp?id1=283&id2=0
http://www.cardomain.com/member_pages/view_page.pl?page_id=218989&page=5
http://www.epinions.com/content_87174909572

All of 'em are saying quarter mile times of around 15s.

I was also going to bring up "bang-for-your-buck" on modibility, but that may go to the Maxima. I just looked at some of the turbocharged Maximas and they're definatly running some pretty good numbers. WRX engines typically can't hold much more than 300awhp, without a wildly aggressive tune, or the transmission breaking. I'm not sure how much that would cost though? Any ideas? I think if you bought some used parts (mainly the turboback exhaust and up pipe, could be had for $700), along with a new VF34 (typical JDM STi turbo uprgrade) turbo kit ($1200) and some engine management ($700) you'd be up around 300awhp. Not sure if the Maxima could beat that, it definatly seems pretty cheap for that kind of power. Along with ease of install. I knew a guy that installed it in a days time, but with the help of some friends and in his friend's shop. The engine would be just as reliable as ever (unless you went with a real aggressive tune), but the transmission may not last long.

I'm sorry, but I just don't see it happening unless someone wasn't giving it their all, or a good racer. I'm not trying to beat the car down, I like the Maximas, and Nissan in general (My first car was an Altima). I'm also not claiming I could beat a Maxima. Quite frankly, I suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck racing in a straight line. However, I believe if you put a non-factory-freak Nissan Maxima 6-Speed, and a Subaru Impreza WRX 5-Speed, with two drivers of similiar skill, the Suby will come out on top in a quarter mile, with the Maxima gaining on it.
 
Goomba
If the guy has an intake on his close to stock WRX, its raises a few eyebrows. I've never seen anyone, ever suggest an intake, untill you've switched to a nice big beefy turbo. Intakes typically cause CELs to go and odd timing. Also, the gains from the intake are next to nothing. Some people actually dynoed with less or the same HP/TQ numbers.

How far back did the WRX's exhaust go back? If he has a full turboback, hes probably at 190awhp. With an up-pipe, hes at 200awhp, with a much quicker spooling turbo. If it was just a cat-back, then he probably didn't gain anything.

Also, I just don't see how a 255hp, 3225lb Maxima would win against a WRX from light to light, unless the WRX isn't launching. I would guess the Maxima starts to pull as much as the WRX in 3rd, then 4th belongs to the Maxima, which explain a higher trap speed in the quarter mile. However these sites:

http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/roadtests/0212scc_roadtest/
http://www.car-videos.com/performance/view.asp?id1=283&id2=0
http://www.cardomain.com/member_pages/view_page.pl?page_id=218989&page=5
http://www.epinions.com/content_87174909572

All of 'em are saying quarter mile times of around 15s.

I was also going to bring up "bang-for-your-buck" on modibility, but that may go to the Maxima. I just looked at some of the turbocharged Maximas and they're definatly running some pretty good numbers. WRX engines typically can't hold much more than 300awhp, without a wildly aggressive tune, or the transmission breaking. I'm not sure how much that would cost though? Any ideas? I think if you bought some used parts (mainly the turboback exhaust and up pipe, could be had for $700), along with a new VF34 (typical JDM STi turbo uprgrade) turbo kit ($1200) and some engine management ($700) you'd be up around 300awhp. Not sure if the Maxima could beat that, it definatly seems pretty cheap for that kind of power. Along with ease of install. I knew a guy that installed it in a days time, but with the help of some friends and in his friend's shop. The engine would be just as reliable as ever (unless you went with a real aggressive tune), but the transmission may not last long.

I'm sorry, but I just don't see it happening unless someone wasn't giving it their all, or a good racer. I'm not trying to beat the car down, I like the Maximas, and Nissan in general (My first car was an Altima). I'm also not claiming I could beat a Maxima. Quite frankly, I suuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck racing in a straight line. However, I believe if you put a non-factory-freak Nissan Maxima 6-Speed, and a Subaru Impreza WRX 5-Speed, with two drivers of similiar skill, the Suby will come out on top in a quarter mile, with the Maxima gaining on it.
The guy with the suby is has now installed the STI tranny. Yes, the exhaust was a turboback. I love his car, if u want pics i can show you.
 
M5Power
Then the WRX driver is stupid. A manual WRX vs. a manual 00-03 Maxima should be no question WRX. It actually shouldn't really be a contest. I think neither car was stock.



"Your" the absurd one. I'm telling you than an 00-03 Maxima can't even "pull" mid 14s stock with either transmission. A manual isn't cracking 14.8 and an automatic isn't going to beat 15.3. The Maxima is my favorite used car, but sorry - there's no point lying to boost its already great performance.
Damn, how stupid can you be? 00-01 and 02-03 are two different maximas. The 02-03 are sporting the 3.5. Of course the WRX driver didnt dump his clutch. It just ruins the car. Im gonna go find some proof for you so you know what maximas can pull. Get your facts straight.
 
Yes, i did go to a maxima forum. There is a whole section of 1/4 mile times. Whats wrong with going to a forum? There is a time slip and everything. Your just mad cause i proved you wrong. Lets get this thread back on topic.

P.S. If you want to talk, AIM me.
 
OoNismoO
i cant think of a better fwd n/a car than the 92-93 integra gsr for its price, and performance. anyone think theres a better car? feel free to show me.

other cars that ive thought of that could compete

vw corrado vr6
95+ nissan sentra ser
92-96 honda prelude si


get the integra bro..... it comes with a b17..... its a rare engine to find.... a buddy of mine just put b16 pistons and added a turbo..... and now he has like 263 horses.... last time he was on a dyno :sly:
 
Back