Allow flash to be in signatures

Noooo!!!

Are you sure you want the entire forum cluttered with mediocre to poor flash imagery? Think of how slow everything would load, think of people like Sage - what would they say?

Noooo!!!
 
We’d say “Nooooo! Ugly flash that takes 20 minutes to load! Turn it off, TURN IT OFF!” …and so-forth.

Blake
 
All joking aside, No. There will never be images in signatures. It adds far too much clutter and slows the page loads immesurably.
 
This was asked ages ago, and the answer was no. And it wasn't due to page clutter.

Flash contains Actionscript, which can do a number of thinks such as launch a heap of popups (amongst another annoyances) and in malicious situations, even execute some code.
 
So I am going on a hunch here, and I am just going to go ahead and say that the whole community says No to flash in signatures... Is that right?

This just proves kids, that anti-flash/images in signatures education in schools is working.
DARE to say NO.
 
I understand that Flash is not acceptable in signatures. However, how about the option to choose between a 100x100 px avatar or a, say, 200x50 px sig image?
 
skip0110
I understand that Flash is not acceptable in signatures. However, how about the option to choose between a 100x100 px avatar or a, say, 200x50 px sig image?
Click to expand...
How about we have no images at all in sigs, unless they're the default smilies. People come to GTP for info, not to look at mindless sig images.
 
Sorry, there will never be any images or flash files in signatures.
 
AH! Having flash in people's signiatures would really really slow the site down.. and I Know that a few people... (you know who you are) could really use it to annoy the hell out of someone...
 

Latest Posts

Back