Disclaimer: This isn't a blind-support post. This is a post against blind idioticy.
He manage to win 2 WDC not only for his consistency, but because Renault we're technologically advanced during the time.......
I disagree. Admittedly, the Renault was more reliable than the McLaren in 2005, but it wasn't like Ferrari's domination-days. Kimi and Schumacher won many races in their respective seasons, and challenged
hard. The two were equally able to win had the McLaren been as reliable as it was fast, and had Schumacher's car not failed twice in the final leg.
Yes, Renault may have had the best launch-control - but Ferrari had a more powerful car and a tight aero-package in the second half while Renault lost their Tuned Mass Dampers. A real car-based domination would've been 2004, or 2002. Even a drunk pet hamster could win the championship in the Ferraris of those vintages.
Nobody says Schumacher "only won because he had the faster car" - even though it did have a superior car: He had a car that won almost every single race.
But he still beat the living daylights out of Barrichello (no doubt, being a definite #1 helped both him and Alonso) - twice Rubens' points in 2002, and almost 50% more in 2004 - which, incidentally, is almost the same as the margins between Alonso and Fisico, as Alonso scored over twice the points Fisico did in both 2005 and 2006.
He started his first F1 race with Minardi in 2001 alongside Tarso Marques and has outperformed him for most of the season.
He fought hard chasing Fisichella's Renault. Back in 2001. In a Minardi.
*cough*
If anything, then it's definite proof of some rather remarkable driving compared to Fisichella, in what is unarguably the worst car on the grid.
