America - The Official Thread

  • Thread starter ///M-Spec
  • 41,929 comments
  • 2,083,715 views
Why the Dems keep losing in a nutshell. Any Dem that is still talking about bipartisanship in the year of the lord 2025 needs to be primaried and have their balls crushed. What do we call someone who bipartisan-ly collaborates with fascists? A fascist.

This is what politics in the US usually is. When the voter base moves one way or the other, the other party moves with it. The republicans have caved on a ton of socialist things in the past, including famously the Bush prescription drug program, or restrictions to 2A like the Trump bump stock ban. Republicans have hated it when this has happened, but it has kept them relevant in the past when they wanted to appeal to voters and the voters had moved away from their core position.

If the democrats are going to try that though this time, it won't work. And the reason it won't work is because there isn't really such a thing as a two-party democracy around fascism.
 
Last edited:
Our Defense Secretary, the drunkard Pete Hegseth, has banned photographs of the B29 Bomber which dropped the atomic bomb on Hiroshima in August 1945.

In the photo below, you'll see the pilot, Col. Paul Tibbets Jr. posing in front of the plane, which he named after his mother, Enola Gay Tibbets.

See if you can guess why Hegseth banned photos of this plane.

The explanation is in the spoiler text below.

It's to do with "DEI". He has also banned a photo of Marine Corps Sgt. Maj. A.C. Gay.


View attachment 1434251
1 of the most significant planes in world history is now woke.


You can't make this **** up with Maga dorks.
 


These both surprise me a little. Trump says he won't pause Tariffs, and then pauses them. He gives Elon a chainsaw and then waives him off.

I'm not saying that what's happening is good. What I'm saying is that if Trump were doing what I'm afraid he's doing, and what a lot of people are afraid he's doing, some of these moves seem oddly concerned about public sentiment and support. I'd have thought by now we'd be in full burn-it-down mode, and yet when we come closest to actual burning Trump pulls the torch back just a bit. I'm less encouraged by this than it might sound, but my impression of Trump is that these moves wouldn't happen, and yet they do. It means my impression is not exactly correct.

It's a huge win for department heads to be in charge rather than Elon, and a major step back with the chainsaw. Of course in the Trump presidency neither of these headlines may last a single day, but for today Elon being an advisor rather than department heads being told to implement everything he says is a major improvement and brings some clarity and organization to what's happening in the federal government.

Backing off on the Tariff is still bad for markets and investment (even though not backing off is worse), and the on-again-off-again nature is likely to somewhat permanently damage trade even if they don't ever go through - Trudeau is right aboot that. But I'm surprised at the pullback in the first place. It reminds me that Trump is somehow still sliiightly connected to what's going on.
 
Last edited:
Orchestral Manoeuvres in the Dark has also been banned from being played on all military bases?
"Joan of Arc" and "Maid of Orleans" have also been declared DEI for promoting women in the military.
 
Last edited:


These both surprise me a little. Trump says he won't pause Tariffs, and then pauses them. He gives Elon a chainsaw and then waives him off.

I'm not saying that what's happening is good. What I'm saying is that if Trump were doing what I'm afraid he's doing, and what a lot of people are afraid he's doing, some of these moves seem oddly concerned about public sentiment and support. I'd have thought by now we'd be in full burn-it-down mode, and yet when we come closest to actual burning Trump pulls the torch back just a bit. I'm less encouraged by this than it might sound, but my impression of Trump is that these moves wouldn't happen, and yet they do. It means my impression is not exactly correct.

It's a huge win for department heads to be in charge rather than Elon, and a major step back with the chainsaw. Of course in the Trump presidency neither of these headlines may last a single day, but for today Elon being an advisor rather than department heads being told to implement everything he says is a major improvement and brings some clarity and organization to what's happening in the federal government.

Backing off on the Tariff is still bad for markets and investment (even though not backing off is worse), and the on-again-off-again nature is likely to somewhat permanently damage trade even if they don't ever go through - Trudeau is right aboot that. But I'm surprised at the pullback in the first place. It reminds me that Trump is somehow still sliiightly connected to what's going on.
I'm chalking it up to the fact that he's getting push back in these areas & finally being reminded he doesn't have the power he thinks he does. Musk's DOGE is finally being told, "No" by actual law & Trump is conceding that the heads of the departments are better off making the decisions, though I believe they will still act in Trump's best interest if they are his stooges.

The tariffs have to be a result of Canada & Mexico pushing back, and the stock market reacting negatively. Trump can bolster all he wants, but the stock market is king when it comes to how the world is reacting. You can't bolster, "We will build the greatest economy America has ever seen" if the market is turning red & indicating a recession. MAGA is a cult, but some of them will catch wind of that & something will spark in their head that something's not right with Trump's decisions.
"Joan of Arc" and "Maid of Orleans" have also been declared DEI for promoting women in the military.
Sad Season 2 GIF by Friends
 
Hmm, wonder if Red Tails, Tuskegee Airmen and Six Triple Eight get banned.
They already tried to and walked it back immediately.
In January 2025, United States Air Force lesson plans and training courses which involved videos of the Tuskegee Airmen were suspended in compliance with the Trump administration’s anti-DEI orders.[155] Shortly after its removal, secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth tweeted his support of its reinstatement while responding to a tweet from Republican Senator Katie Britt.[156]
 
Musk's DOGE is finally being told, "No" by actual law & Trump is conceding that the heads of the departments are better off making the decisions, though I believe they will still act in Trump's best interest if they are his stooges.

Even this though is not as bad as I would have assumed. My assumption would have been that Trump would ignore the judge and tell maga crowds to pay the judge a visit at home as a reminder for how they're supposed to decide a case.

Granted, I don't think he's actually decided to comply with the law and judicial rulings. I think this is mostly due to Elon being unpopular and public sentiment turning against gutting the government in a haphazard way. But I'm STILL surprised that Trump actually cares about public sentiment.
 
Even this though is not as bad as I would have assumed. My assumption would have been that Trump would ignore the judge and tell maga crowds to pay the judge a visit at home as a reminder for how they're supposed to decide a case.
That's what Elon's dumb ass is for. Going on Twitter to cry that a judge blocking Trump's Executive Order because it goes against cemented law is actually "Judiciary Tyranny" which has resulted in death threats towards them.

He also retweeted Laura Loomer who posted a judge's daughter's photo & workplace, clearly inspiring a public reaction by bolstering that tweet to a much wider audience.
Granted, I don't think he's actually decided to comply with the law and judicial rulings. I think this is mostly due to Elon being unpopular and public sentiment turning against gutting the government in a haphazard way. But I'm STILL surprised that Trump actually cares about public sentiment.
Of course he still cares. The man's a Grade A narcissist, the one thing he wants more than anything is to have a population that adores & bends to him. He would love to have his own little North Korean empire.
 
Heather Cox Richardson
Republicans are starting to express some concern about Musk and DOGE. As soon as Trump took office, Musk and his DOGE team took over the Office of Personnel Management, and by February 14 they had begun a massive purge of federal workers. As protests of the cuts began, Trump urged Musk on February 22 to be “more aggressive” in cutting the government, prompting Musk to demand that all federal employees explain what they had accomplished in the past week under threat of firing. That request sparked a struggle in the executive branch as cabinet officers told the employees in their departments to ignore Musk. Then, on February 27, U.S. District Judge William Alsup found that the firings were likely illegal and temporarily halted them.

On Tuesday, Senate majority leader John Thune (R-SD) weighed in on the conflict when he told CNN that the power to hire and fire employees properly belongs to Cabinet secretaries.

Yesterday, Musk met with Republican— but no Democratic— members of Congress. Senators reportedly asked Musk—an unelected bureaucrat whose actions are likely illegal—to tell them more about what’s going on. According to Liz Goodwin, Marianna Sotomayor, and Theodoric Meyer of the Washington Post, Musk gave some of the senators his phone number and said he wanted to set up a direct line for them when they have questions, allowing them to get a near-instant response to their concerns.” Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) told reporters that Musk told the senators he would “create a system where members of Congress can call some central group” to get cuts they dislike reversed.

This whole exchange is bonkers. The Constitution gives Congress alone the power to make appropriations and pass the laws that decide how money is spent. Josh Marshall asks: “How on earth are we in this position where members of Congress, the ones who write the budget, appropriate and assign the money, now have to go hat in hand to beg for changes or even information from the guy who actually seems to be running the government?”

Later, Musk met with House Republicans and offered to set up a similar way for the members of the House Oversight DOGE Subcommittee to reach him. When representatives complained about the random cuts that were so upsetting constituents. Musk defended DOGE’s mistakes by saying that he “can’t bat a thousand all the time.”

This morning, U.S. District Judge John McConnell Jr. ruled in favor of a group of state attorneys general from 22 Democratic states and the District of Columbia, saying that Trump does not have the authority to freeze funding appropriated by Congress. McConnell wrote that the spending freeze "fundamentally undermines the distinct constitutional roles of each branch of our government." As Joyce White Vance explained in Civil Discourse, McConnell issued a preliminary injunction that will stay in place until the case, called New York v. Trump, works its way through the courts. The injunction applies only in the states that sued, though, leaving Republican-dominated states out in the cold.

Today, Trump convened his cabinet and, with Musk present, told the secretaries that they, and not Musk, are in charge of their departments. Dasha Burns and Kyle Cheney of Politico reported that Trump told the secretaries that Musk only has the power to make recommendations, not to make staffing or policy decisions.

Trump is also apparently feeling pressure over his tariffs of 25% on goods from Canada and Mexico and an additional 10% on imports from China that went into effect on Tuesday, which economists warned would create inflation and cut economic growth. Today, Trump first said he would exempt car and truck parts from the tariffs, then expanded exemptions to include goods covered by the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement (USMCA) Trump signed in his first term. Administration officials say other tariffs will go into effect at different times in the future.

The stock market has dropped dramatically over the past three days owing to both the tariffs and the uncertainty over their implementation. But Trump denied his abrupt change had anything to do with the stock market.

“I’m not even looking at the market,” Trump said, “because long term, the United States will be very strong with what’s happening.”
 
Last edited:
It looks like Trumpers are scrambling to count their chickens before their eggs have hatched. The yolk may end up on them though.
 
One of the interesting things about Trump's approach is seeing what the actual value of "good will" is in international politics, diplomacy, economics and military status. The ill will towards the US is now a palpable factor. Hard numbers are obviously very important but what effect does simply pissing everyone off have in the long run?
 
One of the interesting things about Trump's approach is seeing what the actual value of "good will" is in international politics, diplomacy, economics and military status. The ill will towards the US is now a palpable factor. Hard numbers are obviously very important but what effect does simply pissing everyone off have in the long run?
It's a little bit like Brexit in some ways. There were always going to be effects that were felt far enough down the road, that it wouldn't necessarily be directly attributable to the act. Like, if a company pulls investment it's obvious, but ... it still has an effect come the next round of investment.
 
Propably similar to us finns. We are polite but strict and determined. We dont get angry - we pity the fool. You dont need to shout and yell like america - thats just superficial. Its more effective to make you see your mistake and regret. That will teach you. We wont slap you in the face right away - but you can be certain we have registered your attitude.

Maybe one should ask russians from ww2 how it feels to be on the bad side of these polite and silent northern nations.

I used to personally know a very finnish gentleman who moved to Canada in the late 60s and drove trucks for some 30+ years there. The callsign on the nose of his Peterbild was "Big Trouble". That gives you an idea..
I have noticed some similarities between the two cultures, the part in bold in particular is something I think many Canadians would resonate with.

The main difference is that Finns have always had an aggressive neighbour to justify having a sizable armed forces of their own. It has proven to be an effective strategy in making that aggressive country think twice about invading again. For the past century Canada's government has been, well, a bit naive in relying on the US for defence.

For now though, what we can do is show the Trump administration that Canadians are fearless and don't give a damn. We will not give up that easily.

@UKMikey there is an excellent Finnish war movie called The Unknown Soldier that you might like. Look for the English subtitles version on Youtube, I won't link it here, because well, it's a war film. :lol:
 

Latest Posts

Back