So I was thinking about how red states have leaned heavily civil bounty statutes, whereby law provides for a private cause of action (cause to sue) to weaponize courts against disfavored expression or assisting in out-of-state travel for legal abortion services, and considering how blue states could take a similar approach. Well, I had an idea and all it takes is an adventurous legislature and an executive to sign it. With those red state statutes, the law provides for further burden to be placed upon the courts by adjudication of civil claims (actually I think the desire is for the threat of lawsuits to deter particular expression or action), but my idea requires only inaction by the state subsequent to its being signed into law.
So...citing the propensity of worthless Trumpers (but I repeat myself) to perpetrate violent acts, a legislature could codify a legitimate self-defense claim and non-prosecution requirement when one party uses force, including lethal force, against another wearing a MAGA hat. They're unruly animals and that rat what's become the most public face of the deportation effort established in its memoir the precedent that unruly animals are to be shot dead in a gravel pit. Now I don't know if the removal of prosecution is sufficient for a party to take such action, amd it really needn't be because the real aims are deterrence and, even more than that, worthless Trumpers (but I repeat myself) figuratively losing their minds. Of course if any are to literally lose their minds, as by penetration of the skull by a projectile, then that's fine.
Obviously the law would be challenged, but any stay or injunction would be by an activist judge and the order should be ignored.
