Can't fault them for the speed of hot-fixes0.1.3 live
-fixed Settings-Controls UI page issue preventing correct visualization for bound controls icons
- added axis visualization into the Settings-Controls UI page
- Car customization is now enabled in offline mode (thumbnails remain in original colors). This allows users to customize their cars for showroom visualization and single player game modes
- Car customizations are currently reset when quitting the game. Full online mode for all will be enabled very soon.
The team is now focusing on additional fixes and the introduction of online mode and its related features.
Thank you for your participation in the Early Access Program
Assetto Corsa EVO - Version 0.1.3 is now live : actualités Steam
Version 0.1.3 of Assetto Corsa EVO is now live. This includes: - fixed Settings-Controls UI page issue preventing correct visualization for bound controls icons - added axis visualization into the Settings-Controls UI page - Car customization is now enabled in offline mode (thumbnails remain in...store.steampowered.com
But, rest assured these guys at Kunos are hard at work. I wonder what the guys at PD are doing 
So, am I reaching that this is hinting at being able to set up your car from Android/iOS?
I mainly played the PC version right from the start such as the Technology Preview, RC and full release. I do have it on PlayStation but only briefly played it on that. Also got ACC at early access stage, same for EVO.
That is extending the car mod with more parameters, not rewriting the core physics in the game so will face the fundamental issues in the game. As far as I know, they don't have the source code and are not creating a new version of the game. Gave it a brief go and seemed beyond adding like a bottoming feeling, it had the same unrealistic car handling as normal Assetto Corsa, even felt significantly worse in one of the mods I tried.Yep they do, as @Beezer215 described, CSP allows this to be done.
How is it 'so unrealistic', you've said it's wrong a few times now, but you've not been specific about what is actually wrong.
Excellent, what did you have a go with.
Plenty of processing power around to simulate the majority of reality, but out of interest, as a percentage where you would rate each of the sims you've tried in terms of accuracy.
Not accurate at all...
"So, when that occurred, there were some differences between what our simulator was showing and how the car reacted on track. We didn’t go to great details to model that in the simulator because we wanted to avoid it."
...quite a difference between not fully modelling it and needing to upgrade sim tools for it to occur. It's not even a new phenomenon, engineers have been aware of it for decades, it's just not been a factor without ground-effects running.
Formula 1's Porpoising Problem
Porpoising is a phenomenon that caught out many of the F1 teams at the first pre-season test and is something they'll need to get on top of to optimise in this new era.www.racecar-engineering.com
f1i.com
Cannot agree with this ever more if I tried, infact I've devoted my entire-ass life to AC since I played it the first time back in 2018. Despite its current CSP bugs and flaws, alongside an almost entirely flawed toxic community, this driving simulator truly shines and blows my mind clean off whenever I find an excellently realistic and well optimized car in an equally realistic and optimized track, especially with my Thrustmaster T818 DD wheelbase which feels godlike to drive with for me.
I mainly played the PC version right from the start such as the Technology Preview, RC and full release. I do have it on PlayStation but only briefly played it on that. Also got ACC at early access stage, same for EVO.
That is extending the car mod with more parameters, not rewriting the core physics in the game so will face the fundamental issues in the game. As far as I know, they don't have the source code and are not creating a new version of the game. Gave it a brief go and seemed beyond adding like a bottoming feeling, it had the same unrealistic car handling as normal Assetto Corsa, even felt significantly worse in one of the mods I tried.
It is the way the cars behave on the limit. You can fully send it in corners without much consequence. You can literally throw the car in, shift aggressively, hit inside kerb, lift off and floor it while still holding steering into corner and the car will still remain very stable like weight transfer doesn't exist. The braking feels off, it brakes quickly without much effort on or off-track and if you lock-up, you can regain steering really quickly while keeping lock on. Where you expect great mechanical grip like on acceleration, you get unnecessary snaps. Any small thing that makes the car jump almost acts like you hit a landmine when in reality, the car would likely handle it well. Like I said before, it has too little grip when in reality there would be more grip and substantially more grip when there shouldn't be any which takes away the fun of driving on the edge of your seat.
You can see some examples of what I mean in video below. I can post a video with AC Evo if you want too, it feels probably even worse to drive than even AC. It is disappointing that as they try and layer on more realism, it seems to be getting worse with every iteration, so unrealistic and I have seen others think the same on this. Ferrari Virtual Academy was so much more immersive, braking felt better, the way high-speed corners felt a challenge but it has just gone backwards since.
In terms of higher downforce cars, drove them in following order, JP-LM, "F3000", Formula Renault 2.0 and FW33.
These simulators are probably simulating less than 0.1% of reality. Can't imagine there ever being enough to simulate reality at such a fast processing rate. At the end of the day AC is still a great game for the price, something that can run emulated on a entry level smartphone so well optimised and you can pick-up for less than £3, it is phenomenal in a way. I think the actual physical hardware used to play these games nowadays can make any game get close to real steering and pedal weight which will be more useful for real-life training and AC main strength was always like they got like the steering behaviour of cars in the game kind of realistic, performance of the cars too and the laser scanned tracks are decent.
I think they really need to revamp AC EVO a lot fundamentally physics wise to be considered a serious simulator to take on likes of iRacing one day or even as a minimum, bring over more AC users.
Mercedes upgraded factory design tools to address porpoising issue
Mercedes says its efforts to solve the porpoising issue that impacted its 2022 car forced the team to upgrade its design tools at Brackley.
I drove using DualSense. Currently don't have a wheel, will potentially get one when next GT game gets released. Most wheel experience I have on AC was with G27 but have used briefly T-GT and GT DD Pro 5nm and 8nm. I recently drove AC with a high-end DD setup with Simucube ActivePedal Ultimate, it kind of reminded me of the DualSense triggers but a lot stronger.
Not one person here has claimed that AC or ACE is perfect, but equally none of them has jumped to an absurdly extreme position such as yours (and no one in those links has either), such as sims only representing 0.1% of reality!
I was comparing the manner in which it weights up, not claiming the amount of force was the same. If all you took from the video was a strawman attempt at a 'gotcha', you clearly have little interest in actual discussion.
Thanks.
Googling normally, nothing seems to come up but thought I'd give their AI Mode a chance to see if it knows. This is what it came up with (I know AI is not usually accurate with a lot of things but can be useful for this kind of random knowledge stuff):
So let's be clear they are all 0.1% accurate, but you can tell a title that makes no effort to model hybrid systems is more accurate?
I've driven formula cars in reality, but it's nice to be told I'm wrong based on your guesswork.
It is, but that's still not the point I was making at all.
Tell me you don't understand the law of diminishing returns without telling me you don't understand the law of diminishing returns.
LIDAR scanned tracks are not new at all.
Bold claim, name them and back it up.
Oh dear, you don't know that's a marketing piece?
Tell me you don't understand the law of diminishing returns without telling me you don't understand the law of diminishing returns.
The short answer is: No.
