Auto Motor>Street rumour.
I'd actually be more interested in the diesel, weight be damned.
They're photoshop. Nobody's seen the real car yet except for the obvious Audi.
No, it shouldn't imo. Though I would expect some minor add-ons to the current body.Should the car really look any different? I mean it's just a different engine, probably some improved structural things.
Tuned Cummins, what'd I tell ya? only...a LOT quieter! How'd they pull that off? Did they actually put mufflers on the car? they could have made it much louder if they'd wanted to...
This is the R8 I've been waiting for. Everything before it has been a resounding "meh" from me, but a diesel V12? Yes, yes indeed. A "green" sports car that can easily kick enough ass as still manage nearly 30 MPG.
Loves it!
I don't know what to think. I think it looks pretty good, but at the same time, maybe over done in the rear? Have to wait and see the official pictures.
Like Toronado stated, the Enzo isnt bulbous. The Mclaren F1 is alot more bulbous than an Enzo.For some reason, supercar styling is getting bulbous in a hurry. There's nothing lean in the R8's styling, or a Veyron, Konigsegg, Enzo, or Reventon for that matter.
The point wasn't necessarily chronological, Toronado. I included the MC12 because it's an aberration amongst modern supercars. Long, low, and lean in the finest tradition of styling, dating back to the coachbuilders of the 30's.
For some reason, supercar styling is getting bulbous in a hurry. There's nothing lean in the R8's styling, or a Veyron, Konigsegg, Enzo, or Reventon for that matter.
Am I the only one who thinks the R8 looks lean and tidy, if oddly proportioned, while the MC12 is a huge, long, ugly fish?
Am I the only one who thinks the R8 looks lean and tidy, if oddly proportioned, while the MC12 is a huge, long, ugly fish?