Automotive Facelifts - For Better or Worse

Just like the Challenger Civic Type R conversion exists, I can see this Cadillac front clip on the Civic Type R.
1710906727331.jpeg

1710906748026.jpeg
 
The facelifted Taycan certainly looks a bit less...unique I suppose? I will say I've gotten rather bored with Porsche's design as of late, especially with the Macan and Cayenne.

Another facelift that I'm unsure of.

2020 - 2024 Cadillac CT5 prefacelift (or 2022 - 2024 for the Blackwing)

Really like the design of the CT5 when it first came out and it still looks handsome to this day.
2024_cadillac_ct5_sedan_v-blackwing_fq_oem_1_1280.jpg

2021-cadillac-ct5-mmp-1-1599080209.jpg


2025+ facelift doesn't look as cohesive (if that's the word).
2025_cadillac_ct5-v-blackwing_front_1280.jpg

2025-cadillac-ct5-front-three-quarters-6500b97f73e1a.jpg
The blue one reminds me of the C7 ZR-1 where the design brief seems to be "put random **** everywhere". Wouldn't be surprised if they came from the same designer.
 
The blue one reminds me of the C7 ZR-1 where the design brief seems to be "put random **** everywhere". Wouldn't be surprised if they came from the same designer.
The C7 ZR-1 really was a mess with that tacked on spoiler and huge front splitter. With all that aero, I would have expected at least some notable diffuser at the rear to offset it all, but it looks like a regular C7 from the back. (Other than the wide fenders)

On another note...I find the pre-facelift current gen Kia Sorento decent looking (at least from the front)
kia_sorento_2023_asset-carousel_3.jpg



Not sure how Kia's new light designs work on the Sorento's facelift though... It's not bad, but just doesn't seem to fit the body as well as the pre-facelift.
2024-Kia-Sorento.jpg
 
Last edited:
I will commend Kia and Hyundai's dedication to throwing out their entire design language every 4 years.
Hyundai and Kia really are the fast fashion of the auto industry. New designs, often radically new, in a shorter period of time than any of their competitors, yet questionable long-term reliability and quicker depreciation. It could be that they are still overcompensating from their reign during the mid 1980s to the late 2000s as the most boring brands with the worst made products and reputations. I can’t wait to see what the next Santa Fe will look like after Hyundai decides they’re done with the retro-boxy theme.

I say this as a Hyundai owner.
 
Last edited:
Never really was a fan of the current Aston Martin V8 Vantage design. But the facelift makes it too similar to the larger DB12 to the point of losing its individuality. Some would say it makes it better, but I'd prefer a different model to have its own look than to copy the larger model. I do feel like this might be a bit of an unpopular opinion....

Pre-Facelift:
blobid2.jpg


Facelift:
AstonMartinVantage_21.jpg


DB12:
blobid0.jpg
 
Well, the grille hasn’t looked like a bowler hat in ages, but now it’s more like a drying Tupperware bowl.
 
If I have to choose, I think the early 996 Porsche 911 looked better, but it's not by much. I honestly grew fond of them, though that might be my nostalgia since this was the new 911 for a lot of my childhood.
1715892517610.png


1715892655747.jpeg
 
Never really was a fan of the current Aston Martin V8 Vantage design. But the facelift makes it too similar to the larger DB12 to the point of losing its individuality.
Yep. When I first saw the new Aston Martin Vantage I immediately thought they copy-pasted the front end and molded the front intakes into slightly different shapes.
 
I thought about putting this in unpopular opinions thread, but I will put it here instead: I think that best looking XJ-S is last facelift. It's amazing how 70s car still looked current in 90s yet retains its individuality. Bumpers and wheels offered are highlight to me. Rear lights are good looking but original ones flowed better with design
 
Coupe or convertible better below the beltline at the end. The coupe greenhouse got awkward--too much glass in the quarters and weird shape to the hatch.

363_p7_l.jpg
15508_p4_l.jpg


Gotta go with the earlier rear fascia as well. Looks like they just put it through a rock tumbler.
 
Last edited:
Love the pre-facelift XJS but I agree the lines across the bottom are far prettier on the refresh.
 
Coupe or convertible better below the beltline at the end. The coupe greenhouse got awkward--too much glass in the quarters and weird shape to the hatch.



Gotta go with the earlier rear fascia as well. Looks like they just put it through a rock tumbler.
I gotta say looking at this, prefacelift coupe looks better. Totally overlooked the glasshouse. Glasshouses are rarely changed in facelifts
 
I gotta say looking at this, prefacelift coupe looks better. Totally overlooked the glasshouse. Glasshouses are rarely changed in facelifts
They hit the front end out of the park, though, and I think that's what first registers. They did so much to the front end (below the brow) but it ends up looking like a subtle refresh.

I think they were trying to keep the general theme of the pre-'91 but soften as much as possible. The things they did well, they did very well, but the things they didn't do well, they did very badly. The metal sail panels are so svelte on their own that they need the filler panel to bulk them up and when they added more glass they fouled the overall shape. The decklid also needs to end abruptly to work with those long sail panels but they rounded it over and it looks bulbous instead of just softened.

If you could take the earlier shell and swap out the entire front end but change only the rear bumper, I think you'd have something very special. I think the later door handles need to be body color as well, otherwise keep the earlier handles and only remove the side trim.
 
If you could take the earlier shell and swap out the entire front end but change only the rear bumper, I think you'd have something very special. I think the later door handles need to be body color as well, otherwise keep the earlier handles and only remove the side trim.
I would also lightly smoke the prefacelift rear lights because it would give it just enough then current appeal while remaining consistent. Such a simple yet effective detail. Many modern cars would benefit from smoked taillights as it would relax designs a bit IMO.
 
I would also lightly smoke the prefacelift rear lights because it would give it just enough then current appeal while remaining consistent. Such a simple yet effective detail. Many modern cars would benefit from smoked taillights as it would relax designs a bit IMO.
Ehhh, that's fine for you but I don't really agree. I'm not a fan of smoked lenses...probably ever.

Also for the future don't feel like you need to preserve my text formatting. If it goes because of quoting select text (as it does), so be it. I do what I do for me and me alone.
 
Back