Best Car For A 16 Year Old?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Crispy
  • 140 comments
  • 16,294 views
Looks like I might be getting my father's 1994 Chevrolet Corsica. Its front-wheel drive, has a 3.1L V6 engine that puts out barely any horsepower. Guarantees no racing possible. Its got a nice, low stance and is relatively easy to drive. Hoping I get it, because its a good car to start with.
 
Looks like I might be getting my father's 1994 Chevrolet Corsica. Its front-wheel drive, has a 3.1L V6 engine that puts out barely any horsepower. Guarantees no racing possible. Its got a nice, low stance and is relatively easy to drive. Hoping I get it, because its a good car to start with.

It's better than some Asian import... at least you should have the only one around!👍 Plus there should be lots of stuff to do to it... Corsica would be a good starter car. Just don't go overboard trying to push the limits - mine only has 205 HP and I have to remind myself of that quite often!:dunce:
 
just last year I baught my first car a 91 nissan 240sx with only 147k miles on it and it wasnt abused power everything had it for 7 months before a woman dashed through a stop light and front ended me but the elders are right buy something that your not going to get pissed off if its totaled

and im glad mine didnt have airbags because i would have been billed for cleanup plus repair to that. mine is technicly totaled but thats only because the cost is more than the value at 1700 in repairs and the only damage to that truck was white paint on the front drivers tire i need a bumper cover a radiator suport a fender already have the corner marker and headlight and hood

and im 24 with no record before the incident
 
I left one V6 Corsica behind in an uphill with my sisters Opel/Vauxhall Astra 1.6 wagon... :lol: Yeah, it will definitely keep you from getting speeding tickets ;)
 
Looks like I might be getting my father's 1994 Chevrolet Corsica. Its front-wheel drive, has a 3.1L V6 engine that puts out barely any horsepower. Guarantees no racing possible. Its got a nice, low stance and is relatively easy to drive. Hoping I get it, because its a good car to start with.

Corsica isn't a fast car and it's basically a very small boat. I remember test driving one for a friend of my grandmother (she wound up buying it) and it was incredibly easy to drive but I'm afraid of what happens when you do anything too quickly. The nose also winds up nearly on the ground before ABS will do anything on dry pavement. It's not terribly slow either if you really jump on it but I wouldn't suggest it due to the way the chassis acts.

Edit: Leo, we both know that thing was broken, as most Corsicas are. Unbroken ones are okay in terms of power.
 
wait a minute. the 3.1? if you get ANY car with that one, for God's sake, tune the bleep out of it. they're whimpy.
 
gotta love crappy 80's American cars like the Corsica, Topaz, Duster, etc the only good 80s American car was the Buick Grand National and GNX.
 
gotta love crappy 80's American cars like the Corsica, Topaz, Duster, etc the only good 80s American car was the Buick Grand National and GNX.

LOL that's the same car!
you forgot to add the coupe version of the Corsica, the Beretta (which GM had to fight Beretta SpA over the rights to)

you mean "tempo", Topaz is the Mercury clone and you forgot ford's attempt at bringing the Mondeo over for americans. it flopped, too.
 
Correction, the Corsica was created in 1990. Before that I was looking at a 1984 Chevrolet Celebrity. Now that was an 80s piece of junk. 2.8L V6 putting out like 100 hp (guy had it on a dyno :lol:). But the point of this thread is what's a good car to start with. With that being said, I'd say for a new car get a Chevy Malibu, it looks good and has a modest powerplant. A used car that is reccomended is a Ford Escort 1981-2001 model years. Read it in this year's Lemon-Aid car book.
 
Correction, the Corsica was created in 1990. Before that I was looking at a 1984 Chevrolet Celebrity. Now that was an 80s piece of junk. 2.8L V6 putting out like 100 hp (guy had it on a dyno :lol:). But the point of this thread is what's a good car to start with. With that being said, I'd say for a new car get a Chevy Malibu, it looks good and has a modest powerplant. A used car that is reccomended is a Ford Escort 1981-2001 model years. Read it in this year's Lemon-Aid car book.

Up North you can't go wrong with a Subaru either. Mine is great fun in the snow.
 
90's Subaru Impreza or Honda Civic or similar. There should be no other options for a new driver. I had a 93 Accord when I got my license in 2001. If I had gotten (or my parents had bought me) a Miata or something sporty, I'd be dead. I totaled my Accord within the first year.
 
Correction, the Corsica was created in 1990. Before that I was looking at a 1984 Chevrolet Celebrity. Now that was an 80s piece of junk. 2.8L V6 putting out like 100 hp (guy had it on a dyno :lol:). But the point of this thread is what's a good car to start with. With that being said, I'd say for a new car get a Chevy Malibu, it looks good and has a modest powerplant. A used car that is recommended is a Ford Escort 1981-2001 model years. Read it in this year's Lemon-Aid car book.

I dunno, the 83 I had with the 2.5 squeezed out 31 MPG on me. and with a 16 gallon tank, I had a range of 400 miles/640 km on the CHEAP gas (it actually GOT it's window sticker estimate of 25!)
 
Loving my Corolla, great first car to have. It's not technically mine, but I've been driving it to school, work and around town. Gets just under 50 mpg if I baby it on the 80 km/h highways I'm usually driving on. If I drive it angry I still get 30+. It's not a high performance car by any stretch of the imagination, but around 3k-5k revs it puts out some decent power. There's also that it's a pretty light car (under 2500 pounds), so it's decently peppy, and of course that helps the fuel economy.
 
997 911 GT2 RS would be a good start........ slow, safe, comfortable, good on gas, VERY affordable, the list goes on and on! ;D

Nah, GT3 RS is better. I mean, it has the greatest safety feature of any car ever! A peice of scaffolding in the back! ;)
 
No, the GT2RS has that two tone paintjob which makes it worth it for a teen. Besides, the death in the GT2RS would be much faster and less painful. GT2RS is the way to go on this one.
 
Last edited:
This:

One trait I notice in a lot of drivers--young, middle, and old--is that they have no clue what is going on around them. A sea of brakelights ahead on the road surprises them...they change lanes and jerk back to the right because they didn't see a car along side of them. As my dad taught me: "Stay away from idiots...and everyone is an idiot". Concise advice, but it's a good mantra. Knowing where people are, how fast they're going, what they're likely to do, and keeping space around you goes a long way towards avoiding accidents. What is that "idiot" ahead of me going to do? Probably the most stupid thing he can...that's what I'll assume...Now, if he does that stupid thing, what will I do? Do I have an escape route? This is the kind of skill that can't be learned in a day, month, or year. It takes a lot of time on the road in real situations.

That's kind of like what my dad taught me, and this is while driving to always think that everyone is trying to kill you. Because of the appalling number of incredibly bad drivers in the D.C. area where I live, I've added that they're either trying to kill you or be killed by you.

Which brings me to my next point, chiming in on the new drivers = bad drivers debate. I think (and have been told by adults) that I'm a great driver...FOR MY AGE. I think that's the element we've been missing here. The stereotype of all teenagers going out, speeding, driving recklessly and crashing their cars immediately is simply not true, BUT if you're a teenage driver who drives wrecklessly, obeys all the traffic laws, and stays alert and aware of your surroundings, you're a good TEENAGE driver, but not a good driver, and as so many have wisely said, that comes with experience.

I spent most of my childhood staring out the window of the car. Lo and behold, when I finally got my license, I actually knew how to get to places, whereas some of my friends would get lost and panicked. There's no substitute for being behind the wheel, but as you say, observing other cars when you're a passenger begins to develop the skill I mentioned above.

It's the same situation with me. I learned a lot riding in the car with my mom or dad driving me places around town, like how to get places around where I live and how to anticipate when someone is going to pull into your lane in front of you. I would sit in the front seat and just watch all the cars around ours, and I learned to instinctively know when a driver was going to pull in in front of us, and that's helped me out a LOT when driving.

As for the perfect car, nearly everyone (if they/their parents were at least sort of smart when buying one) will vouch for their own, and I'll do the same. I have a 2002 Subaru Forester that my parents bought me (they bought my older brother a Forester as well), and it's everything I'll ever want or need in a car. Not that quick since it's a 4-cylinder in a small SUV/tall wagon, but it can still easily break the speed limits so it teaches you restraint and self control at the wheel, and a HUGE amount of space in the back for the up to three large musical instruments I have to carry around on a regular basis. The fuel economy isn't great because of its weight, but it's not too bad, and it's fun to drive. I think that you really shouldn't worry about a car being fun to drive for a new driver, because (at least for me anyway) ANY car is fun to drive. The only exciting thing about the way my car drives is that it has a pretty good turning radius, but I just love driving the thing because I love driving. If you have a teenager that hates driving, they shouldn't have a car.

The main reason my parents bought this car, though, is that it's safe, which is the most critical aspect of your kid's first car, so that they can survive in a crash. Most of the cars people have listed - Geo Metro, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Tercel, etc., ...mainly compact and subcompact cars, simply aren't safe enough to survive a hard crash with an SUV, and that's why my parents decided mine and my brother's HAD to be an SUV with side airbags, because let's face it, nowadays with the amount of extraordinarily clueless drivers out there, being hit by a big car or SUV is almost more likely than a teenager crashing his/her first car unaided.
 
That's kind of like what my dad taught me, and this is while driving to always think that everyone is trying to kill you. Because of the appalling number of incredibly bad drivers in the D.C. area where I live, I've added that they're either trying to kill you or be killed by you.

Which brings me to my next point, chiming in on the new drivers = bad drivers debate. I think (and have been told by adults) that I'm a great driver...FOR MY AGE. I think that's the element we've been missing here. The stereotype of all teenagers going out, speeding, driving recklessly and crashing their cars immediately is simply not true, BUT if you're a teenage driver who drives wrecklessly, obeys all the traffic laws, and stays alert and aware of your surroundings, you're a good TEENAGE driver, but not a good driver, and as so many have wisely said, that comes with experience.

The other thing I think a lot of teenagers forget, is that your brain is still growing and developing when you're 16 or 17. It's not necessarily anything to do with intelligence, but things like judging speed and distance, spatial awareness, coordination, concentration, multi tasking while driving, they're all harder to do for teenagers. Not just because we're so new at it, but also because our brains aren't fully grown yet. I consider myself to be a good teenage driver, but I'm not going to pretend I'm a great overall driver. That will come in time.
 
Back