Not if he earns it by rushing for the winning TD as well as collecting first downs with his feet and not throwing any INTs.
And NE could easily be where they are with another QB--I find it puzzling why some of you just can't accept it.
uh, REAL QB's don't rush! That is why you have RBs. Yes, NE could be at a similar place with only a few NFL QBs, few QBs are nearly as composed, efficient, or smart as Brady. Name 3 QBs with similar or better numbers in the last five years.
Brady is not the best QB ever, but he has put up Joe Montana type numbers, and he had fabulous O-lines too, and that scary defense. Did you complain about Joe Montana when he won SuperBowls with totally stacked teams, or how about Troy in Dallas, and he had a hell of a RB?? And these were before the dreaded Salary Cap era, when you could actually keep a team together.
Brady is a QB with 7 yrs NFL Experience, with three SB Rings and 2 SB MVP's. Yeah, I see your point about him not being all that good (sarcastic).
2002- The winning drive came as the seconds ticked off and no time outs left. It looked like all the momentum had shifted the Rams way when they came from 14 points behind and tied the game at 17 in the fourth quarter. But Tom Brady, that cool, collected quarterback who seems to have been born for this moment (he was named the game's MVP) made play after play until his team found themselves at the Ram 31 with :07 on the clock. Just as cooly, Vinatieri made history.
2004- Under the bright lights of the worlds biggest sporting event, the offenses lit up the scoreboard in the second half. Tom Brady threw for 354 yards on 32-of-48 passing while Deion Branch had 10 catches for 143 yards and a score. ... it was Brady -- the Super Bowl MVP once again -- and his team that came away with their second world championship in three seasons
2005- Deion Branch -- the game MVP -- had a monster game with 11 catches for 133 yards while Tom Brady was 23 of 33 for 236 yards and two touchdowns.