Bugatti Veyron 16.4 13 extreme analysis

[BrainStormAQ]

I tested this car on the following:

• Special Stage Route X (Fictional) (for top speed mainly and Avg speed_USA) + PP_USA
• Suzuka Circuit (full Circuit) (for Avg speed_Japan) + PP_Japan
• 24 Heures du Mans Racing Circuit (full circuit) (for Avg speed_France) + PP_France
• Nürburgring (24 Layout) (for Avg speed_Germany) + PP_Germany

To check the videos see the links:


For ultimate settings:








The results are the following:
Special Stage Route X: 2 laps
Top Speed: 457 Km/Hour
Time (sec): 509.283 sec
Avg Speed: 428.1266015 Km/Hour
Performance point PP: 809.38

Suzuka Circuit (full Circuit): 3 laps
Time (sec): 371.618 sec
Avg Speed: 168.7636229 Km/Hour
Performance point PP: 809.38

24 Heures du Mans Racing Circuit (full circuit): 2 laps
Time (sec): 433.785 sec
Avg Speed: 226.215291 Km/Hour
Performance point PP: 811.19

Nürburgring (24 Layout): 2 laps
Time (sec): 988.935 sec
Avg Speed: 184.7660362 Km/Hour
Performance point PP: 811.32
Avg PP: 810.3175

Evaluation Points: 2391.138042
To check how it is calculated please visit this post for more details:
Evaluation Performance Tuning Project for all GT7 cars

Evaluation Performance Tuning Project for all GT7 cars

Hello everyone I was thinking over the years of a mathematical equation that gives accurate results to help deciding which car is the best to choose based on specific classes, so here is my suggestion so far: Each car will be tuned to the finest limits accoarding to specific tracks in a way to...

www.gtplanet.net

 

[eran0004]

Avg Speed: 428.1266015 Km/Hour

Evaluation Points: 2391.138042

There are too many decimal points in the speed and evaluation points. It makes it harder to read and it adds no value, since we don’t have that much precision in the way these things are measured. For example, you have around 4 digits of precision for the distance covered, and 6 digits of precision for the time, so we only know the average speed with a certainty of up to 4 digits. The rest of the digits are basically just noise, because we don’t know if they are correct.

So, average speed: 428.1 km/h
Evaluation points: 2391

Easier to read, and provides all the information needed

 

[BrainStormAQ]

There are too many decimal points in the speed and evaluation points. It makes it harder to read and it adds no value, since we don’t have that much precision in the way these things are measured. For example, you have around 4 digits of precision for the distance covered, and 6 digits of precision for the time, so we only know the average speed with a certainty of up to 4 digits. The rest of the digits are basically just noise, because we don’t know if they are correct.

So, average speed: 428.1 km/h
Evaluation points: 2391

Easier to read, and provides all the information needed

I really thank you for your post appreciate that and regarding decimal points everything is calculated based on formula so I just copied pasted the results without interfere. Another thing I noticed is that there are really not so much differences regarding specific races and cars so if I have time I will re test the similarities again to make sure not getting identical results at all in the mean time hope you enjoy the videos and you can check the main equation for more clarification and you are always welcome to give me feedback so that I can improve it

 

[OMY38]

hello, thank you very much for the work you have done for a novice like me, it helps me enormously, thank you again