After seeing what they are required to do to cars turned in for this rebate, I've got to say this is one of the most irresponsible things they could be doing. That Blazer was in good shape, and its only a 2001...Someone could have bought that and gotten plenty of use of it.
What the hell.
http://www.8thcivic.com/forums/inside-out/169275-death-clunker.html
1st of all leave it to idiot Civic forums to enjoy posting such things about American cars--show me a Honda or Toyota product in as good of a condition as that Blazer was (which was good) being "destroyed" on this forum and they loving it.
THIS IS A COMPLETE AND UTTERLY RETARDED IDEA. And here is why...
1. Perfectly servicable or drivable vehicles are being destroyed when there are literally tens of thousands of needy families where the parents are in desperate need of reliable transportation. They need to get to work to feed their families!
2. People that don't have a clue trade in their 1970 Porsches or 1982 Camaros just to get a few grand off of a new car--that car is a classic and is worth some money to someone. Someone could of taken that "clunker" and fully restored it to factory spec which would of be just as clean and fuel efficiant as a new one.
3. These morons never heard of recycling? How about they RECYCLE the materials? If they fuse cast iron heads to aluminum pistons/rods/block and etc that just prevents an easy recycling. Isn't the idea of recycling a good one? Or maybe someone needs to sell the parts to others that need them for their car. That Blazer had perfectly good lights, bodywork, wheels, glass, and etc just by looking on the video.
I have tears in my eyes. What is wrong with these people?
They don't have brains in their thick skulls.
I feel slightly offended watching that. I have a '95 Blazer and its fine, its not a "clunker". I don't agree with this Cash For Clunkers thing at all, well atleast the destroying portion of it.
You know what, everytime I start up my '97 minivan or my '90 Camaro V8 I will ENJOY flipping off these morons for this retarded idea. Yes, I take stupidity personally when it is THIS convoluted. I'll enjoy starting up my Camaro's V8 that gets a craptastic MPG rating and probably pollutes the planet more than a 2010 Camaro. I'll consider it my protest of this stupid idea.
Wait, they destroy the cars being traded in? As in, they have to do it? Are you serious? What idiot thought that was a good idea? You probably could have gotten nearly 4500 for it on the open market and then someone would have had a car.
This is what I thought. Someone trades in their reasonably good shape automobile (such as this Blazer) and then the dealership donates this to a needy family that NEEDS a vehicle to get to work. MAYBE THIS IS HOW YOU HELP THE AMERICAN PEOPLE! Give a vehicle to someone who needs it to get to work to feed his or her family? This cash for clunkers is a really bad idea because people are trashing vehicles that are NOT clunkers. A 2001 vehicle--that is TWENTY FIRST CENTURY produced is NOT a clunker.
What did you think they did with the cars?
*see above
Donate the good or decent ones to charity.
Mine has run on 3 cylinders before when I was trying to see how long I could drive it before it exploded.
My Camaro ran 15 miles on 7 cylinders @ 45mph.
I'd rather keep my job.
EDIT: I guess if I was REALLY against the idea, I'd be willing to lose my job over it, but I'm not going to lie, I'm going to enjoy doing it.
I dunno, something about being handed the keys to an old Jeep Cherokee and being told "here, break it." makes me all happy inside. Maybe it's because I've actually worked on a lot of them, and lets just say I'm surprised there isn't some insanely high suicidal rate for people who have to work on domestic vehicles.
You are sick. Even though I don't really care about Chrysler or GM products I would never wish a good condition or possible collectable/classic car being destroyed.