Castrol or Denso

  • Thread starter Thread starter supra229
  • 22 comments
  • 1,732 views

Which is your favourite?

  • Toyota Castrol Tom's Supra

    Votes: 12 31.6%
  • Toyota Denso Sard Supra

    Votes: 22 57.9%
  • Either

    Votes: 4 10.5%

  • Total voters
    38
Since both Supras have about the same horsepower, for more power, the Denso version is what I pick. Otherwise, for handling, the Castrol Tom's is a better choice.
 
I think the denso is better in looks, HP, and I use the denso 4 almost all of my endurance races because u can put T2 racing slicks on it and still kicks all other JGTC cars without having to change ur tires as much as them.:crazy:
 
i thought this a while ago but look at the specs for both cars, theyre identical, the only difference is the look of the car, no difference in weight or HP...
 
It would seem logical that there would be some differences in the driving characteristics of the two cars since they are from different tuners. But I have played a lot of head to head with them and from my own experience they do seem identical. This goes for horsepower and their handling.

They are both equally good, I mean, you won't regret getting one of the 2.

greetz
 
but it's weird how both of the Supras have the same rims just different colours...and the thing in the middle is blue on one side and red on the other...
 
Originally posted by Apclps
It would seem logical that there would be some differences in the driving characteristics of the two cars since they are from different tuners. But I have played a lot of head to head with them and from my own experience they do seem identical. This goes for horsepower and their handling.

They are both equally good, I mean, you won't regret getting one of the 2.

greetz


Yes,. it would seem logical that they would be different,.. but,. lemme assure you,. they are the same,.. just as the NSX race cars are all the same ;)
 
If you are playing the simulation game as normal without major moneybuilding, I would say that your best bet is the denso. The Denso supra can be won quite early into the game in amateur, wheras the castrol can either be bought at an extortianate price or won later in the game in professional where it is rather useless.

I would go for the Denso becasue it is probably the quickest FR car in the game. But I haven't really driven the castrol supra enough to compare.
 
Originally posted by Red Eye Racer
Yes,. it would seem logical that they would be different,.. but,. lemme assure you,. they are the same,.. just as the NSX race cars are all the same ;)

I don't agree with you on that one ;)

Somehow i'm a bit faster in my raybridge NSX than in the 2 other NSX powerhouses. This could all be mental but i'm convinced that there are differences for the NSX cars... (even tho mine are all fully tuned and have been treated identically, also is a hp difference)

grtz
 
Originally posted by Apclps
I don't agree with you on that one ;)

Somehow i'm a bit faster in my raybridge NSX than in the 2 other NSX powerhouses. This could all be mental but i'm convinced that there are differences for the NSX cars... (even tho mine are all fully tuned and have been treated identically, also is a hp difference)

grtz


This test was performed by the most elite driver the complex string has ever seen:
JBS at GT3times
Arta - 3'35.781
Raybrig - 3'35'852
Mugen - 3'35'882

Proves just how equal these cars are and how consistent I am at driving them at Complex.

I'll upload all 3 replays sometime today.

Only .101 separates the Arta from the Mugen, and the Raybrig's right in between. All cars had the same setup. They truly are the same car with a different paint scheme.

I can probably better the times by 2 seconds atleast. I just wanted to prove a point at my consistency.

here's the link: JBschumachers Personal Log at GT3times
 

Latest Posts

Back