CLOSED POLL: 2.0 Advanced Competition 105 (W: GPR)

  • Thread starter Thread starter SlipZtrEm
  • 39 comments
  • 2,182 views

THEME: Some Say...

  • [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/ferrari458/6803178806/lightbox][img]http://farm8.staticflickr.com/

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • [url=http://www.flickr.com/photos/kasparschultz/8225468854/in/photostream/lightbox/][img]http://farm

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • [URL="http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff100/Slayer_AC/The-Top-Gear-Test-Track-FS.png"][IMG]http:/

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    76
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
GPR destroying the poll, just like old times :lol:

lol, thanks. :dopey: Although I don't remember destroying any polls before. I used to enter the photoshop comps but never the PMC 2.0 or PMC comps before.
 
Honored to make my first poll - Thank You zzz_pt!

GREAT SHOTS! I have to say, all the amazing work I've seen in these competitions from fellow members has greatly inspired my photography! Cheers to Gran Turismo and its awesome fans! :cheers:

Good Luck to everyone in the polls!
 
Last edited:
Could i get some feedback?
i wanted to enter this but i missed the deadline

The Top Gear Test Track_1 by ItsFJ, on Flickr

That probably wouldn't make to the poll because we don't see the car... But its a great shot for a possible "top gear" theme. I like the colors/lightning.

@GPR: Thank you mate :)

@theBOGROLL: You're welcome pal! :) Nice shot.
 
i dont usually ask for feedback, but man you got some good feed back. :)👍
s7 lacking definition? Too plain in colors? some great shots in the poll - so i think mine was not quite up to it this time. :sly:

8233392192_5a863cf3f2.jpg
 
i dont usually ask for feedback, but man you got some good feed back. :)👍
s7 lacking definition? Too plain in colors? some great shots in the poll - so i think mine was not quite up to it this time. :sly:

8233392192_5a863cf3f2.jpg

Haitauer, in first place I think you were brave to try with a standard car. 👍

why it didn't make it to the poll was: 1. The lack of definition (not of the car but of the background...the sky looks a GT3 shot :P) 2.being a 2.0 competition I don't see much of editing in you entry. The GT logo is there and I imagine that you add a vignette and maybe some levels/contrast adjustments. I think you can do better. ;)

Ah! the pros: I like the angle, composition and sense of speed. :) A more vivid color on the car maybe would turn the outcome a bit less "cold" (blue). :)
 
Haitauer, in first place I think you were brave to try with a standard car. 👍

why it didn't make it to the poll was: 1. The lack of definition (not of the car but of the background...the sky looks a GT3 shot :P) 2.being a 2.0 competition I don't see much of editing in you entry. The GT logo is there and I imagine that you add a vignette and maybe some levels/contrast adjustments. I think you can do better. ;)

Ah! the pros: I like the angle, composition and sense of speed. :) A more vivid color on the car maybe would turn the outcome a bit less "cold" (blue). :)

good feedback 👍 I did make some compromises in purpose. The Color of the car is the one i think is "the right color" for S7. I also left the sky looking like so and made the picture little "cold" for a change - just because me my self and many many others seem to favour the overly warm pictures. Lect it looking a bit like brushed instead of realism. Also I did limit my use of photoshop as im not quite familiar what is allowed and what not. I would love those "3.0" competitions - kind of all out "outlaw" -group. ;) (well maybe no using multiple pictures / stitching as that would just make it silly)
 
Congratulations, GPR; a deserved win it is. 👍

Thanks GT-R. :)

And thank you very much to all that voted for me, I'm quite suprised I got that many votes, really am. :D 👍 👍
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest Posts

Back