Here's my feedback, sorry for the delay. I hope it is helpful and not too negative, I tried to be constructive. If you want more feedback than what's here, please PM me with your entry, and I'll give you as much as I can.

This is a good shot, no doubt, but I felt that the angle wasn't very realistic. I don't think that it fits the theme very well, other than that it's very good. 👍

This is not, as a whole, a bad shot, but I don't like the composition very much. The car is touching the edge of the frame, which is not very good looking, and the shot is straight on. If the car had been further up and to one side, and there had been a different angle, it would have made it into the poll. As it is, the composition is a bit boring. However, the lighting is very good, as is the toning.

While realistic, this shot was not included for two reasons. First, I thought the exhaust was a bit ungainly and not very realistic. Second, the car seemed a bit out of focus at the back. Everythign else was great!

This one was close, but it didn't get in for a couple reasons. First, the car itself was a bit dark, and hard to see. Second, and this really comes down to personal taste, I didn't like the modifications, nor did I find them especially realistic.

I'm not a fan of this shot. It's fairly realistic, yes, but the composition draws the eye up and away from the car, which is very hard to see in the first place. It would have been better without any car, just a photo of the buildings.

As above, it's fairly realistic, but the composition isn't very exciting. If the shot had been zoomed in more with a bit of angle on it, it probably would have made it in the poll.

This shot was very close to being in the poll, however I cut it in part because of the pixelation caused by the smoke. That detracted from the image as a whole, but I thought the rest was very good. You did a great job of making the headlamps look very realistic.

This photo wasn't included in part due to car choice. The NASCARs have very rounded, featureless bodies, covered in stickers, so it's hard to find a good angle. In this shot, the car looked boring, and the overall composition and toning were a bit lacking as well.

This photo suffered from what I thought to be an overly simple composition. It would have been better if more of the drifting action was shown, as well. The lighting was certainly realistic, but the fact that the car was almost perfectly centred made it look a bit boring.

Here, the shot was let down by the fairly drab colours and that thing at the left. I don't know what it is, but including it didn't work for me.

Again, composition. The car was dead centre, and there was naught else very interesting in the photo. The slight fisheye effect distorted the car's pretty lines, as well. I would put the camera higher up and far away next time you're taking a shot like this.

If there was a 26th spot in the poll, this shot would occupy it. It's very, very good, and very realistic, but the wheels and colour aren't quite as realistic as they could be.

This shot was simply too dark for me to consider it. I wanted to see more of the car, not just the headlamp. Perhaps next time the car could be halfway in the light?

Unfortunately, your shot was a victim of PD. The roughly modelled people and furniture undermined the realistic look of the car, so the shot as a whole is clearly from GT5. Also, I would have liked to see more of the car, without anything in the way.

As with a few others, this shot was simply too dark. The overall feel is very artistic, but not my cup of tea. I'm drawn to look at the black nothingness where the number plate would be, making it feel even darker.

This is one of the last shots that I eliminated. In part, I felt that the angle wasn't entirely realistic, but more importantly the brightest bits of the photo felt a bit glowy, so the sharpness is compromised.

It's too dark! I can hardly tell what kind of car it is. It's not very realistic as far as I can see, because most of the photo is total blackness.

Now, i realise that you felt a little offended by the fact that I didn't include your photo in the poll. While not a bad shot, I didn't think it was a good as some of the others, nor did I think it was especially realistic. The composition was excellent, however the overexposed sky, neon paint, and near incompatibility of the green car with the brown landscape conspired to create a lack of uniformity in the toning of the shot. There was almost no mood, which made the shot seem one-dimensional and amateurish, despite the excellent composition and sense of speed. I apologise for any offence I have caused you, and want to encourage you to keep trying with the competitions. When I first started entering, about a year ago, my shots were terrible. Really, really awful, but I kept at it, and this was my first time judging. Eventually, you'll win a competition

👍

This shot was one that I was close to putting in the poll, however it seemed a bit drab and overexposed. The toning was grey, the sky very bright, and the composition a tad boring.

Here, you nailed the realism, but unfortunately the composition isn't quite as good. It's a bit boring, and the angle is slightly unnatural. Also, the car is a bit dark; I would have preferred it to be lighter.

This was a really well lit shot that was let down by the fact that there was a fence in the way. While I didn't like that, everything else was spot on.

This shot was a bit dull, too dark, and not realistic enough for me. It's not bad, but I think that the composition could have been made more interesting. Also, the warm filter darkens the photo, and allows the light to dominate. I don't think that the filter was necessary.

This shot wasn't included partly for the modifications, and partly for the lack of an interesting composition. The hood pins are ungainly, and the car shouldn't be so centred. I would recommend that you play with more interesting angles.

I think that the exclusion of this shot was my personal taste. I didn't like the angle or composition much, thought the toning, colours, and lighting were very good.

This shot needs quite a few improvements, in my opinion. First, the person should not have been in shot. He's very pixelated and simple, and undermines any realism the shot may have had. Second, I would like to see a better sense of speed, You can do this by using panning mode 3 and a low shutter speed. Finally, the bit at the top of the photo is very distracting for me, the shot would look nicer with that cut out.